From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Vikas Gupta <vikas.gupta@broadcom.com>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
andrew+netdev@lunn.ch, horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com,
bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com, rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com,
ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com, dharmender.garg@broadcom.com,
rahul-rg.gupta@broadcom.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net v2 1/2] bnge: fix initial HWRM sequence
Date: Fri, 17 Apr 2026 07:42:54 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260417074254.42f01fa7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAHLZf_voEPTrfkuO6pJcchaQaOqJin8m7j-+hwMrjJcGFmJv0A@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, 17 Apr 2026 11:46:08 +0530 Vikas Gupta wrote:
> > > -err_func_unrgtr:
> > > - bnge_fw_unregister_dev(bd);
> > > +err_free_ctx_mem:
> > > + bnge_free_ctx_mem(bd);
> > > return rc;
> > > }
> >
> > This error path appears to have the same regression. If
> > bnge_hwrm_func_drv_rgtr() fails after bnge_func_qcaps() has already
> > configured the backing store, freeing the context memory directly without
> > unregistering might allow the hardware to access freed memory.
>
> Even if bnge_hwrm_func_drv_rgtr() fails, it is still safe to free the context
> memory at the host because the driver unloads from this point.
Looking closer, indeed, the way bnge_hwrm_func_drv_unrgtr() is written
the AI suggestion is pointless. Hopefully you're right cause debugging
FW corrupting host memory after reboot on bnxt is not fun.
> AI reviews appear to ignore logic related to handling context memory
> in the patch.
> I see no valid comments on the patch.
Why is bnge_func_qcaps() allocating context mem? It may be the case
that context mem has to be allocated but bnge_func_qcaps() doesn't
sound like a function that'd perform such key part of init.
Why not just move the alloc earlier in bnge_fw_register_dev() ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-17 14:42 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-15 15:16 [PATCH net v2 0/2] bnge fixes Vikas Gupta
2026-04-15 15:16 ` [PATCH net v2 1/2] bnge: fix initial HWRM sequence Vikas Gupta
2026-04-17 2:22 ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-04-17 6:16 ` Vikas Gupta
2026-04-17 14:42 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-04-17 15:47 ` Vikas Gupta
2026-04-15 15:16 ` [PATCH net v2 2/2] bnge: remove unsupported backing store type Vikas Gupta
2026-04-16 3:54 ` Przemek Kitszel
2026-04-16 5:22 ` Vikas Gupta
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260417074254.42f01fa7@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=ajit.khaparde@broadcom.com \
--cc=andrew+netdev@lunn.ch \
--cc=bhargava.marreddy@broadcom.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dharmender.garg@broadcom.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=rahul-rg.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=rajashekar.hudumula@broadcom.com \
--cc=vikas.gupta@broadcom.com \
--cc=vsrama-krishna.nemani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.