All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
Date: Sat, 18 Apr 2026 04:57:15 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260418045715.EAF7EC2BCB5@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260418014439.6353-2-sj@kernel.org>

Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [Medium] Command-line override for the 'enabled' parameter is broken: passing 'enabled=N' after 'enabled=Y' fails to disable the module.
--

commit 6f46639cc34c6ddcbecc0aba915988dff8f651de
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>

mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values

This commit updates DAMON_RECLAIM to dynamically query the running status
of kdamond instead of relying on cached parameter values. This ensures
that when kdamond stops unexpectedly, the enabled and kdamond_pid parameters
reflect the correct state.

> diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> index 86da147786583..46660c8d4d422 100644
> --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c

[ ... ]

> @@ -332,10 +316,16 @@ module_param_cb(addr_unit, &addr_unit_param_ops, &addr_unit, 0600);
>  MODULE_PARM_DESC(addr_unit,
>  	"Scale factor for DAMON_RECLAIM to ops address conversion (default: 1)");
>  
> +static bool damon_reclaim_enabled(void)
> +{
> +	if (!ctx)
> +		return false;
> +	return damon_is_running(ctx);
> +}
> +
>  static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,
>  		const struct kernel_param *kp)
>  {
> -	bool is_enabled = enabled;
>  	bool enable;
>  	int err;
>  
> @@ -343,7 +333,7 @@ static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,
>  	if (err)
>  		return err;
>  
> -	if (is_enabled == enable)
> +	if (damon_reclaim_enabled() == enable)
>  		return 0;

Does changing this check break kernel command-line overrides during boot?

During early boot when command-line parameters are parsed, ctx is not yet
allocated, so damon_reclaim_enabled() unconditionally returns false.

If a system has damon_reclaim.enabled=Y in the boot parameters and an
administrator appends damon_reclaim.enabled=N to override it, the first
evaluation correctly sets the internal enabled flag to true.

However, when the second parameter (N) is processed, enable is false.
Since damon_reclaim_enabled() also returns false, the condition matches
and the function returns 0 immediately. The internal enabled variable is
never updated to false, causing the module to start unexpectedly when
damon_reclaim_init() runs.

Should this keep checking the internal enabled variable during early boot?

>  
>  	/* Called before init function.  The function will handle this. */
> @@ -359,15 +349,46 @@ static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260418014439.6353-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-04-18  4:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-18  1:44 [RFC PATCH v2 0/3] mm/damon/modules: detect and use fresh status SeongJae Park
2026-04-18  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 1/3] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values SeongJae Park
2026-04-18  4:57   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-18 15:14     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-18  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 2/3] mm/damon/lru_sort: " SeongJae Park
2026-04-18  5:30   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-18 15:36     ` SeongJae Park
2026-04-18  1:44 ` [RFC PATCH v2 3/3] mm/damon/stat: detect and use fresh enabled value SeongJae Park
2026-04-18  5:54   ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-18 15:40     ` SeongJae Park

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260418045715.EAF7EC2BCB5@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=sj@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.