From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Jerome Marchand" <jmarchan@redhat.com>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Page out as late a possible in file_reader
Date: Mon, 20 Apr 2026 23:13:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260420231328.68FC7C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260420134637.2513867-1-jmarchan@redhat.com>
Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [Low] The newly promoted global variable `addr` is declared without the `static` keyword, polluting the global namespace.
--
commit e2c581de007abac2e6985b4f49f6c9786c3263b0
Author: Jerome Marchand <jmarchan@redhat.com>
selftests/bpf: Page out as late a possible in file_reader
The file_reader/on_open_expect_fault fails consistently on my system.
This commit moves the call to madvise(MADV_PAGEOUT) to just before
attaching the program to minimize the risk of having those pages pulled
back in.
> diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/file_reader.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/file_reader.c
> index 5cde32b35da44..48aae7ea0e4bb 100644
> --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/file_reader.c
> +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/file_reader.c
> @@ -10,6 +10,7 @@
>
> const char *user_ptr = "hello world";
> char file_contents[256000];
> +void *addr;
This isn't a bug, but BPF selftests link all prog_tests/*.c files together
into a single test_progs executable.
Since modern compilers use -fno-common by default, could this un-prefixed
global variable cause a multiple definition linker error if another test
introduces a global variable with the same name?
Should addr be declared as static to safely restrict its linkage to
file_reader.c?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260420134637.2513867-1-jmarchan@redhat.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-20 23:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-20 13:46 [PATCH] selftests/bpf: Page out as late a possible in file_reader Jerome Marchand
2026-04-20 16:52 ` Mykyta Yatsenko
2026-04-21 5:59 ` Jerome Marchand
2026-04-20 23:13 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-21 10:52 ` Jiri Olsa
2026-04-22 21:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260420231328.68FC7C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=jmarchan@redhat.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.