From: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
To: Paulo Alcantara <pc@manguebit.org>
Cc: <oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev>, <lkp@intel.com>,
Steve French <stfrench@microsoft.com>,
ChenXiaoSong <chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn>,
"David Howells" <dhowells@redhat.com>,
<linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org>, <samba-technical@lists.samba.org>,
<oliver.sang@intel.com>
Subject: [linux-next:master] [smb] 40e75e42f4: filebench.sum_operations/s 9.5% improvement
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 21:31:45 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202604211611.9b649c8a-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
Hello,
kernel test robot noticed a 9.5% improvement of filebench.sum_operations/s on:
commit: 40e75e42f49ca54b4ff41f3edb94f5ef0299140c ("smb: client: fix open handle lookup in cifs_open()")
https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/next/linux-next.git master
testcase: filebench
config: x86_64-rhel-9.4
compiler: gcc-14
test machine: 512 threads 4 sockets Intel(R) Xeon(R) 6768P CPU @ 2.4GHz (Granite Rapids) with 128G memory
parameters:
disk: 1SSD
fs: ext4
fs2: cifs
test: webproxy.f
cpufreq_governor: performance
Details are as below:
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------->
The kernel config and materials to reproduce are available at:
https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260421/202604211611.9b649c8a-lkp@intel.com
=========================================================================================
compiler/cpufreq_governor/disk/fs2/fs/kconfig/rootfs/tbox_group/test/testcase:
gcc-14/performance/1SSD/cifs/ext4/x86_64-rhel-9.4/debian-13-x86_64-20250902.cgz/lkp-gnr-4sp2/webproxy.f/filebench
commit:
d4c7210d2f ("smb: client: fix iface port assignment in parse_server_interfaces")
40e75e42f4 ("smb: client: fix open handle lookup in cifs_open()")
d4c7210d2f3ea481 40e75e42f49ca54b4ff41f3edb9
---------------- ---------------------------
%stddev %change %stddev
\ | \
11.25 +8.0% 12.15 filebench.sum_bytes_mb/s
185317 +9.5% 202907 filebench.sum_operations
3088 +9.5% 3381 filebench.sum_operations/s
812.33 +9.5% 889.50 filebench.sum_reads/s
32.28 -8.7% 29.48 filebench.sum_time_ms/op
162.33 +9.5% 177.83 filebench.sum_writes/s
450654 +4.1% 468946 filebench.time.file_system_outputs
65856 ± 2% -5.4% 62305 filebench.time.minor_page_faults
100.50 -37.8% 62.50 ± 2% filebench.time.percent_of_cpu_this_job_got
181.94 -38.1% 112.56 filebench.time.system_time
281234 +8.9% 306129 filebench.time.voluntary_context_switches
12871 +5.7% 13600 vmstat.system.cs
0.31 -0.1 0.22 mpstat.cpu.all.sys%
39.00 ± 18% -97.4% 1.00 mpstat.max_utilization.seconds
0.16 ± 13% -0.0 0.11 ± 18% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.task_tick_idle
0.51 ± 29% +0.5 1.05 ± 58% perf-profile.children.cycles-pp.hrtimer_try_to_cancel
0.16 ± 13% -0.0 0.11 ± 17% perf-profile.self.cycles-pp.task_tick_idle
18.00 -18.5% 14.67 ± 3% turbostat.Avg_MHz
0.47 -0.1 0.38 turbostat.Busy%
0.44 ± 3% +7.9% 0.48 turbostat.CPU%c1
0.39 +16.8% 0.45 turbostat.IPC
2624523 -4.0% 2519538 turbostat.IRQ
77.69 ± 3% -7.1% 72.19 perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.average.ms
74994 ± 2% +8.4% 81279 perf-sched.total_wait_and_delay.count.ms
77.37 ± 3% -7.0% 71.96 perf-sched.total_wait_time.average.ms
77.69 ± 3% -7.1% 72.19 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
74994 ± 2% +8.4% 81279 perf-sched.wait_and_delay.count.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
77.37 ± 3% -7.0% 71.96 perf-sched.wait_time.avg.ms.[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown].[unknown]
7.73e+08 -7.5% 7.152e+08 perf-stat.i.branch-instructions
12690 +5.9% 13433 perf-stat.i.context-switches
9.481e+09 -18.8% 7.696e+09 perf-stat.i.cpu-cycles
3.583e+09 -5.4% 3.389e+09 perf-stat.i.instructions
0.32 +8.1% 0.34 perf-stat.i.ipc
1.48 +0.1 1.61 perf-stat.overall.branch-miss-rate%
2.65 -14.2% 2.27 perf-stat.overall.cpi
3007 ± 6% -19.1% 2433 ± 3% perf-stat.overall.cycles-between-cache-misses
0.38 +16.5% 0.44 perf-stat.overall.ipc
7.704e+08 -7.6% 7.117e+08 perf-stat.ps.branch-instructions
12637 +5.8% 13364 perf-stat.ps.context-switches
9.449e+09 -18.9% 7.659e+09 perf-stat.ps.cpu-cycles
3.57e+09 -5.6% 3.372e+09 perf-stat.ps.instructions
6.534e+11 -5.5% 6.173e+11 perf-stat.total.instructions
Disclaimer:
Results have been estimated based on internal Intel analysis and are provided
for informational purposes only. Any difference in system hardware or software
design or configuration may affect actual performance.
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 13:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202604211611.9b649c8a-lkp@intel.com \
--to=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=chenxiaosong@kylinos.cn \
--cc=dhowells@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-cifs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pc@manguebit.org \
--cc=samba-technical@lists.samba.org \
--cc=stfrench@microsoft.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.