All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: cros-kernel-buildreports@googlegroups.com
Cc: oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev
Subject: [android-common:android16-6.12 3/3] error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 02:40:28 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <202604220230.Gf1mPyNn-lkp@intel.com> (raw)

tree:   https://android.googlesource.com/kernel/common android16-6.12
head:   0c92b4b15aea72b4ccb8cdd20702b9ca21ca05aa
commit: e3e946868864503f88b95a0d8ffe6d61b7df82d6 [3/3] ANDROID: update KABI macros for gendwarfksyms
config: x86_64-randconfig-002-20260421 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260422/202604220230.Gf1mPyNn-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 20.1.8 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 87f0227cb60147a26a1eeb4fb06e3b505e9c7261)
rustc: rustc 1.88.0 (6b00bc388 2025-06-23)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260422/202604220230.Gf1mPyNn-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)

If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202604220230.Gf1mPyNn-lkp@intel.com/

All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):

>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:50:1
   |
   50 | assert_eq!(*x, 24);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_assert`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:50:1
   |
   50 | assert_eq!(*x, 24);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:152:1
   |
   152 | assert_eq!(*value, [1; 32]);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1153:97
   |
   1153 | } let test_return_value = _doctest_main__kbuild_src_consumer_rust_kernel_alloc_kvec_rs_798_0(); assert!(test_return_value.is_ok()); }
   |                                                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `kernel::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_assert`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1153:97
   |
   1153 | } let test_return_value = _doctest_main__kbuild_src_consumer_rust_kernel_alloc_kvec_rs_798_0(); assert!(test_return_value.is_ok()); }
   |                                                                                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `kernel::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1205:1
   |
   1205 | assert_eq!(iter.size_hint().0, size - 1);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_assert`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1205:1
   |
   1205 | assert_eq!(iter.size_hint().0, size - 1);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1208:1
   |
   1208 | assert_eq!(iter.size_hint().0, size - 2);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_assert`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1208:1
   |
   1208 | assert_eq!(iter.size_hint().0, size - 2);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_loc`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1211:1
   |
   1211 | assert_eq!(iter.size_hint().0, size - 3);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
--
>> error[E0063]: missing field `__kabi_reserved1` in initializer of `kunit_assert`
   --> rust/doctests_kernel_generated.rs:1211:1
   |
   1211 | assert_eq!(iter.size_hint().0, size - 3);
   | ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ missing `__kabi_reserved1`
   |
   = note: this error originates in the macro `$crate::kunit_assert` which comes from the expansion of the macro `assert_eq` (in Nightly builds, run with -Z macro-backtrace for more info)
..

Kconfig warnings: (for reference only)
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_PCM_IEC958
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_SOC_CONFIGS [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_COMPRESS_ACCEL
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_CONFIGS [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_JACK
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_CONFIGS [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_VMASTER
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_CONFIGS [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for CAN_RX_OFFLOAD
   Depends on [n]: NETDEVICES [=y] && CAN_DEV [=n] && CAN_NETLINK [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_MCP251XFD_CONFIGS [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_JACK_INPUT_DEV
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n] && SND_JACK [=y]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_CONFIGS [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_INTEL_NHLT
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_CONFIGS [=y] && ACPI [=y]
   WARNING: unmet direct dependencies detected for SND_PCM_ELD
   Depends on [n]: SOUND [=y] && SND [=n]
   Selected by [y]:
   - GKI_HIDDEN_SND_CONFIGS [=y]

-- 
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki

                 reply	other threads:[~2026-04-21 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=202604220230.Gf1mPyNn-lkp@intel.com \
    --to=lkp@intel.com \
    --cc=cros-kernel-buildreports@googlegroups.com \
    --cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.