From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Waiman Long" <longman@redhat.com>
Cc: mkoutny@suse.com, tj@kernel.org, linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org,
hannes@cmpxchg.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 13/23] sched/core: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask
Date: Wed, 22 Apr 2026 03:09:01 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260422030902.4F95FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260421030351.281436-14-longman@redhat.com>
Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s):
- [High] The commit message incorrectly claims that `housekeeping_cpumask()` will warn if used in an invalid context, masking potential RCU safety violations elsewhere in the kernel. Specifically, `housekeeping_dereference_check(type)` returns `true` for `HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE`, causing `rcu_dereference_all_check()` to bypass the `rcu_read_lock_held()` validation. This false assumption of a safety net led the author to miss unprotected accesses, such as the `housekeeping_show` sysfs handler in `drivers/base/cpu.c` which does not hold `rcu_read_lock()`. Because `housekeeping_update()` replaces and frees the old mask via `kfree()` after `synchronize_rcu()`, concurrent execution of `housekeeping_show()` results in a Use-After-Free. While the lockdep omission is patched later in the series by commit "sched/isolation: Extend housekeeping_dereference_check() to cover changes in nohz_full or manged_irqs cpumasks", the underlying Use-After-Free vulnerability in `drivers/base/cpu.c` remains unfixed throughout the entire series.
--
commit 7a774b36f9d9b430bf7171534b53f6145556f483
Author: Waiman Long <longman@redhat.com>
sched/core: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask
This commit adds RCU protection to the HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask in
get_nohz_timer_target(), as the mask can now be changed at runtime. It
also notes that housekeeping_cpumask() will warn if used in an invalid
context.
> As HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE is going to be changeable at run time, use
> RCU to protect access to the cpumask when needed. Some access of the
> HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask is done inside the tick code that has
> interrupt disabled which is a rcu_read_lock() critical section. Anyway,
> housekeeping_cpumask() will warn if they are used in invalid context.
Is this description accurate? Looking at housekeeping_dereference_check(),
it returns true for HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE, which causes
rcu_dereference_all_check() to bypass the rcu_read_lock_held() validation.
This means lockdep will not warn about missing RCU read locks for this
specific mask.
Because the mask can now be replaced and freed dynamically after
synchronize_rcu(), does this introduce a use-after-free in other readers
that don't hold the RCU read lock?
For example, housekeeping_show() in drivers/base/cpu.c reads this mask to
print it to sysfs:
drivers/base/cpu.c:housekeeping_show() {
...
return sysfs_emit(buf, "%*pbl\n",
cpumask_pr_args(housekeeping_cpumask(type)));
}
Since housekeeping_show() doesn't hold rcu_read_lock(), could a concurrent
update of the cpumask cause cpumask_pr_args() to access freed memory?
While the lockdep omission is patched later in this series by the commit
"sched/isolation: Extend housekeeping_dereference_check() to cover changes
in nohz_full or manged_irqs cpumasks", the underlying use-after-free
regression in drivers/base/cpu.c appears to remain unfixed throughout the
series.
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260421030351.281436-1-longman@redhat.com?part=13
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-04-22 3:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 66+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-21 3:03 [PATCH-next 00/23] cgroup/cpuset: Enable runtime update of nohz_full and managed_irq CPUs Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 01/23] sched/isolation: Add HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE_BOOT & HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ_BOOT Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 02/23] sched/isolation: Enhance housekeeping_update() to support updating more than one HK cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-22 6:39 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 03/23] tick/nohz: Make nohz_full parameter optional Waiman Long
2026-04-21 8:32 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:14 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-24 15:57 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-04-22 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 04/23] tick/nohz: Allow runtime changes in full dynticks CPUs Waiman Long
2026-04-21 8:50 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:24 ` Waiman Long
2026-05-13 13:04 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-04-22 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 05/23] tick: Pass timer tick job to an online HK CPU in tick_cpu_dying() Waiman Long
2026-04-21 8:55 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:22 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 06/23] rcu/nocbs: Allow runtime changes in RCU NOCBS cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 2:05 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 07/23] watchdog: Sync up with runtime change of isolated CPUs Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 2:14 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 08/23] arm64: topology: Use RCU to protect access to HK_TYPE_TICK cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-22 9:34 ` Chen Ridong
2026-05-13 16:19 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 09/23] workqueue: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_TIMER cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 10/23] cpu: " Waiman Long
2026-04-21 8:57 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:25 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 11/23] hrtimer: " Waiman Long
2026-04-21 8:59 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 12/23] net: Use boot time housekeeping cpumask settings for now Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 13/23] sched/core: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_KERNEL_NOISE cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-04-23 14:37 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 14/23] hwmon/coretemp: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_MISC cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 15/23] Drivers: hv: Use RCU to protect access of HK_TYPE_MANAGED_IRQ cpumask Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 17:14 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 16/23] genirq/cpuhotplug: " Waiman Long
2026-04-21 9:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 14:29 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 17/23] sched/isolation: Extend housekeeping_dereference_check() to cover changes in nohz_full or manged_irqs cpumasks Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-23 17:30 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 18/23] cpu/hotplug: Add a new cpuhp_offline_cb() API Waiman Long
2026-04-21 16:17 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-21 17:29 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 18:43 ` Thomas Gleixner
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 19/23] cgroup/cpuset: Improve check for calling housekeeping_update() Waiman Long
2026-04-23 1:10 ` Chen Ridong
2026-04-24 18:32 ` Waiman Long
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 20/23] cgroup/cpuset: Enable runtime update of HK_TYPE_{KERNEL_NOISE,MANAGED_IRQ} cpumasks Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 21/23] cgroup/cpuset: Limit the side effect of using CPU hotplug on isolated partition Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 22/23] cgroup/cpuset: Prevent offline_disabled CPUs from being used in " Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-04-21 3:03 ` [PATCH 23/23] cgroup/cpuset: Documentation and kselftest updates Waiman Long
2026-04-22 3:09 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260422030902.4F95FC2BCB0@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
--cc=linux-hwmon@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=longman@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.