From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: David Vernet <void@manifault.com>,
Andrea Righi <arighi@nvidia.com>,
Changwoo Min <changwoo@igalia.com>
Cc: sched-ext@lists.linux.dev, emil@etsalapatis.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>,
Zhao Mengmeng <zhaomzhao@126.com>, Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 02/17] sched_ext: Rename ops_cpu_valid() to scx_cpu_valid() and expose it
Date: Thu, 23 Apr 2026 15:32:05 -1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260424013220.2923402-3-tj@kernel.org> (raw)
Rename the static ext.c helper and declare it in ext_internal.h so
ext_idle.c and the upcoming cid code can call it directly instead of
relying on build_policy.c textual inclusion.
Pure rename and visibility change.
Signed-off-by: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
Reviewed-by: Cheng-Yang Chou <yphbchou0911@gmail.com>
---
kernel/sched/ext.c | 22 +++++++++++-----------
kernel/sched/ext_idle.c | 6 +++---
kernel/sched/ext_internal.h | 2 ++
3 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext.c b/kernel/sched/ext.c
index 0ba12449f0c6..1d6613dc4d3b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext.c
@@ -1055,7 +1055,7 @@ static inline bool __cpu_valid(s32 cpu)
}
/**
- * ops_cpu_valid - Verify a cpu number, to be used on ops input args
+ * scx_cpu_valid - Verify a cpu number, to be used on ops input args
* @sch: scx_sched to abort on error
* @cpu: cpu number which came from a BPF ops
* @where: extra information reported on error
@@ -1064,7 +1064,7 @@ static inline bool __cpu_valid(s32 cpu)
* Verify that it is in range and one of the possible cpus. If invalid, trigger
* an ops error.
*/
-static bool ops_cpu_valid(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, const char *where)
+bool scx_cpu_valid(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, const char *where)
{
if (__cpu_valid(cpu)) {
return true;
@@ -1677,7 +1677,7 @@ static struct scx_dispatch_q *find_dsq_for_dispatch(struct scx_sched *sch,
if ((dsq_id & SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON) == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON) {
s32 cpu = dsq_id & SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_CPU_MASK;
- if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, "in SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON dispatch verdict"))
+ if (!scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, "in SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON dispatch verdict"))
return find_global_dsq(sch, tcpu);
return &cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq;
@@ -3260,7 +3260,7 @@ static int select_task_rq_scx(struct task_struct *p, int prev_cpu, int wake_flag
this_rq()->scx.in_select_cpu = false;
p->scx.selected_cpu = cpu;
*ddsp_taskp = NULL;
- if (ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, "from ops.select_cpu()"))
+ if (scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, "from ops.select_cpu()"))
return cpu;
else
return prev_cpu;
@@ -8679,7 +8679,7 @@ static void scx_kick_cpu(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, u64 flags)
struct rq *this_rq;
unsigned long irq_flags;
- if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (!scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return;
local_irq_save(irq_flags);
@@ -8775,7 +8775,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_dsq_nr_queued(u64 dsq_id)
} else if ((dsq_id & SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON) == SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_ON) {
s32 cpu = dsq_id & SCX_DSQ_LOCAL_CPU_MASK;
- if (ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL)) {
+ if (scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL)) {
ret = READ_ONCE(cpu_rq(cpu)->scx.local_dsq.nr);
goto out;
}
@@ -9164,7 +9164,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cap(s32 cpu, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
guard(rcu)();
sch = scx_prog_sched(aux);
- if (likely(sch) && ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (likely(sch) && scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return arch_scale_cpu_capacity(cpu);
else
return SCX_CPUPERF_ONE;
@@ -9192,7 +9192,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc u32 scx_bpf_cpuperf_cur(s32 cpu, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
guard(rcu)();
sch = scx_prog_sched(aux);
- if (likely(sch) && ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (likely(sch) && scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return arch_scale_freq_capacity(cpu);
else
return SCX_CPUPERF_ONE;
@@ -9228,7 +9228,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc void scx_bpf_cpuperf_set(s32 cpu, u32 perf, const struct bpf_prog_au
return;
}
- if (ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL)) {
+ if (scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL)) {
struct rq *rq = cpu_rq(cpu), *locked_rq = scx_locked_rq();
struct rq_flags rf;
@@ -9341,7 +9341,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct rq *scx_bpf_cpu_rq(s32 cpu, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
if (unlikely(!sch))
return NULL;
- if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (!scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return NULL;
if (!sch->warned_deprecated_rq) {
@@ -9398,7 +9398,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc struct task_struct *scx_bpf_cpu_curr(s32 cpu, const struct bpf_prog_
if (unlikely(!sch))
return NULL;
- if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (!scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return NULL;
return rcu_dereference(cpu_rq(cpu)->curr);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
index c43d62d90e40..11d11ea6ca6b 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_idle.c
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@ static s32 select_cpu_from_kfunc(struct scx_sched *sch, struct task_struct *p,
bool we_locked = false;
s32 cpu;
- if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, prev_cpu, NULL))
+ if (!scx_cpu_valid(sch, prev_cpu, NULL))
return -EINVAL;
if (!check_builtin_idle_enabled(sch))
@@ -975,7 +975,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc s32 scx_bpf_cpu_node(s32 cpu, const struct bpf_prog_aux *aux)
guard(rcu)();
sch = scx_prog_sched(aux);
- if (unlikely(!sch) || !ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (unlikely(!sch) || !scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return NUMA_NO_NODE;
return cpu_to_node(cpu);
}
@@ -1257,7 +1257,7 @@ __bpf_kfunc bool scx_bpf_test_and_clear_cpu_idle(s32 cpu, const struct bpf_prog_
if (!check_builtin_idle_enabled(sch))
return false;
- if (!ops_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
+ if (!scx_cpu_valid(sch, cpu, NULL))
return false;
return scx_idle_test_and_clear_cpu(cpu);
diff --git a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
index c35098668fb1..5e3b79963d41 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
+++ b/kernel/sched/ext_internal.h
@@ -1350,6 +1350,8 @@ DECLARE_PER_CPU(struct rq *, scx_locked_rq_state);
int scx_kfunc_context_filter(const struct bpf_prog *prog, u32 kfunc_id);
+bool scx_cpu_valid(struct scx_sched *sch, s32 cpu, const char *where);
+
/*
* Return the rq currently locked from an scx callback, or NULL if no rq is
* locked.
--
2.53.0
next reply other threads:[~2026-04-24 1:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-24 1:32 Tejun Heo [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-04-24 17:27 [PATCHSET v2 REPOST sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-24 17:27 ` [PATCH 02/17] sched_ext: Rename ops_cpu_valid() to scx_cpu_valid() and expose it Tejun Heo
2026-04-28 20:35 [PATCHSET v3 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-28 20:35 ` [PATCH 02/17] sched_ext: Rename ops_cpu_valid() to scx_cpu_valid() and expose it Tejun Heo
2026-04-29 18:21 [PATCHSET v4 sched_ext/for-7.2] sched_ext: Topological CPU IDs and cid-form struct_ops Tejun Heo
2026-04-29 18:21 ` [PATCH 02/17] sched_ext: Rename ops_cpu_valid() to scx_cpu_valid() and expose it Tejun Heo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260424013220.2923402-3-tj@kernel.org \
--to=tj@kernel.org \
--cc=arighi@nvidia.com \
--cc=changwoo@igalia.com \
--cc=emil@etsalapatis.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sched-ext@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=void@manifault.com \
--cc=yphbchou0911@gmail.com \
--cc=zhaomzhao@126.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.