All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Thomas Richter" <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] perf test: probe_vfs_getname add do_getname() probing fallback
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2026 00:57:45 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260425005746.36BCEC19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260416125515.3481495-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com>

Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s):
- [Medium] Out-of-bounds kernel memory read in `do_getname` perf probe due to unterminated string.
- [Medium] Missing user-space pointer fallback logic reduces test robustness.
--

commit 44caa018a80d8e3283b4eda7b6e0f0690afbe123
Author: Thomas Richter <tmricht@linux.ibm.com>

perf test: probe_vfs_getname add do_getname() probing fallback

This commit extends the vfs_getname perf test logic to fall back to probing
do_getname() if getname_flags() does not match. This reflects updated kernel
code where the getname_flags() implementation was changed.

> diff --git a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh
> --- a/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh
> +++ b/tools/perf/tests/shell/lib/probe_vfs_getname.sh
[ ... ]
> @@ -28,12 +30,24 @@ add_probe_vfs_getname() {
>  			line=$(perf probe -L getname_flags 2>&1 | grep -E "$result_aname_re" | sed -r "s/$result_aname_re/\1/")
>  		fi
>  
> +		if [ -z "$line" ] ; then
> +			do_getname=1
> +			result_iname_re="[[:space:]]+([[:digit:]]+)[[:space:]]+initname\(result\);"
> +			line=$(perf probe -L do_getname 2>&1 | grep -E "$result_iname_re" | sed -r "s/$result_iname_re/\1/")
> +		fi
> +
>  		if [ -z "$line" ] ; then
>  			echo "Could not find probeable line"
>  			return 2
>  		fi
>  
> -		perf probe -q       "vfs_getname=getname_flags:${line} pathname=result->name:string" || \
> +		if [ "$do_getname" -eq 1 ]
> +		then
> +			param="vfs_getname=do_getname:${line} pathname=result->iname:string"

Does this probe cause an out-of-bounds kernel memory read when the path exceeds
EMBEDDED_NAME_MAX?

If a user provides a long file path, strncpy_from_user() completely fills the
fixed-size result->iname array without appending a NUL terminator, while the
actual NUL-terminated path is dynamically allocated and pointed to by
result->name.

Because the probe explicitly instructs the kernel to read result->iname as a
NUL-terminated string, could the kprobe fetcher read past the end of the iname
array into adjacent slab memory? Should this use result->name:string instead?

> +			perf probe -q "$param" || perf probe $add_probe_verbose "$param" || return 1

Is the user-space pointer fallback missing here?

The original probe logic for getname_flags robustly handles compiler
optimizations by falling back to probing the user-space function argument
directly (pathname=filename:ustring) if reading the kernel result struct fails.

This new block for do_getname instead retries the exact same probe string, just
adding a verbose flag. Since filename remains the first argument to
do_getname(), would it be safer to include the filename:ustring fallback to
prevent the test from failing on certain toolchains?

> +			return 0
> +		fi
> +		perf probe -q "vfs_getname=getname_flags:${line} pathname=result->name:string" || \
>  		perf probe $add_probe_verbose "vfs_getname=getname_flags:${line} pathname=filename:ustring" || return 1
>  	fi
>  }

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260416125515.3481495-1-tmricht@linux.ibm.com?part=1

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-04-25  0:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-16 12:55 [PATCH] perf test: probe_vfs_getname add do_getname() probing fallback Thomas Richter
2026-04-21 11:09 ` [PATCH Ping] " Thomas Richter
2026-04-25  0:57 ` sashiko-bot [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260425005746.36BCEC19425@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=tmricht@linux.ibm.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.