From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ian Rogers" <irogers@google.com>
Cc: linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 9/9] perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 10:53:00 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260504105301.29676C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260504081227.2203848-10-irogers@google.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] This problem wasn't introduced by this patch, but the open() call in debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf() lacks the O_NONBLOCK flag, exposing a local Denial of Service (DoS) vulnerability.
--
commit a6e339ae66465b909762a437f958cdaed424b666
Author: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
perf debuginfo: Fix libdw API contract violations
This commit adds return value checks for dwfl_report_end and
dwfl_module_relocation_info to prevent potential segmentation faults. It also
fixes a file descriptor leak in the error path of
debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf() when offline initialization fails.
> diff --git a/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c b/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> index 0e35c13abd04..84a78b30ceac 100644
> --- a/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> +++ b/tools/perf/util/debuginfo.c
> @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static int debuginfo__init_offline_dwarf(struct debuginfo *dbg,
> {
> GElf_Addr dummy;
> int fd;
> + bool fd_consumed = false;
>
> fd = open(path, O_RDONLY);
While this wasn't introduced by this patch, could this open() call cause a
regression by hanging on a FIFO?
If the path originates from user-controlled sources, opening it without
O_NONBLOCK can cause the perf record session to hang indefinitely. Using
O_RDONLY | O_NONBLOCK would prevent this.
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260504081227.2203848-1-irogers@google.com?part=9
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-04 10:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 46+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-03 0:35 [PATCH v3 0/6] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 1/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw segmentation fault in cu_walk_functions_at Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 0:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 2/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 3/6] perf libdw: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:18 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 4/6] perf probe-finder: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:34 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 5/6] perf annotate-data: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 1:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 0:35 ` [PATCH v3 6/6] perf debuginfo: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 2:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 0/6] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 1/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw segmentation fault in cu_walk_functions_at Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:33 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 2/6] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 17:40 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 23:36 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 3/6] perf libdw: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 18:09 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-03 23:44 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 4/6] perf probe-finder: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:49 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 5/6] perf annotate-data: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:53 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-03 17:10 ` [PATCH v4 6/6] perf debuginfo: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-03 23:54 ` Namhyung Kim
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] [PATCH v5 0/9] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 1/9] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw segmentation fault in cu_walk_functions_at Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 2/9] perf dwarf-aux: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 3/9] perf srcline: Introduce inline_node__clear_frames() Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 4/9] perf libdw: Fix callchain parent update in ORDER_CALLER mode Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 5/9] perf libdw: Support DWARF line 0 in inline list Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 6/9] perf libdw: Fix libdw API contract violations and memory leaks Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 7/9] perf probe-finder: Fix libdw API contract violations Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 8/9] perf annotate-data: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 8:12 ` [PATCH v5 9/9] perf debuginfo: " Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 10:53 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-04 15:26 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-04 17:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-04 23:50 ` [PATCH v5 0/9] [PATCH v5 0/9] perf DWARF: Fix libdw API contract violations and crashes Namhyung Kim
2026-05-05 16:29 ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-07 8:20 ` Masami Hiramatsu
2026-05-06 0:54 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-07 6:11 ` Namhyung Kim
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260504105301.29676C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=irogers@google.com \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.