All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Philipp Hahn" <p.hahn@avm.de>
Cc: linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] watchdog: Fix wrong SPDX license identifier
Date: Mon, 04 May 2026 11:17:34 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260504111735.3D387C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <5557c8ab4a62750c95631f6f78be7d2b11e091fc.1777892508.git.phahn-oss@avm.de>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Medium] The commit claims to fix a checkpatch warning by replacing `GPL-2.0` with `GPL-2.0-only`, but the kernel's checkpatch does not warn about `GPL-2.0` in this context, making the change unnecessary churn based on a false premise.
--

commit b8d17764218e572db22388434473471ed009998c
Author: Philipp Hahn <phahn-oss@avm.de>

watchdog: Fix wrong SPDX license identifier

This commit updates the SPDX license identifier in the watchdog
documentation from GPL-2.0 to GPL-2.0-only.

> The identifier GPL-2.0 has been deprecated in favor of GPL-2.0-only.
> Change it to silence checkpatch.

Is this description accurate regarding checkpatch?

Looking at scripts/checkpatch.pl, it only enforces GPL-2.0-only for files
under Documentation/devicetree/bindings/ and include/dt-bindings/.

Additionally, LICENSES/preferred/GPL-2.0 explicitly defines GPL-2.0 as a
valid identifier in the Linux kernel.

Since checkpatch does not emit warnings for GPL-2.0 in generic subsystem
documentation like Documentation/watchdog/index.rst, does this change
introduce unnecessary churn?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/cover.1777892508.git.phahn-oss@avm.de?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-04 11:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-04 11:02 [PATCH 0/6] Cleanup Linux Watchdog documentation Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH 1/6] watchdog: Fix wrong SPDX license identifier Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 11:17   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-04 13:44     ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-04 13:52       ` AW: " Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 14:07         ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH 2/6] watchdog: Change suffix .txt to .rst in references Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH 3/6] watchdog: Move `struct` before name Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH 4/6] watchdog: Replace intermixed tab/space indent Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH 5/6] watchdog: Separate kind of documentation Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 11:02 ` [PATCH 6/6] watchdog: Prefix WDT with ICS for clarity Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 14:00   ` Guenter Roeck
2026-05-04 13:49 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Cleanup Linux Watchdog documentation Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 13:49   ` [PATCH v2 1/5] watchdog: Change suffix .txt to .rst in references Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 13:50   ` [PATCH v2 2/5] watchdog: Move `struct` before name Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 13:50   ` [PATCH v2 3/5] watchdog: Replace intermixed tab/space indent Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 13:50   ` [PATCH v2 4/5] watchdog: Separate kind of documentation Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 13:50   ` [PATCH v2 5/5] watchdog: Prefix WDT with ICS for clarity Philipp Hahn
2026-05-04 17:11     ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-04 14:11   ` [PATCH v2 0/5] Cleanup Linux Watchdog documentation Guenter Roeck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260504111735.3D387C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-watchdog@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=p.hahn@avm.de \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.