From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>
To: Vastargazing <vebohr@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>,
Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@kernel.org>,
Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@arm.com>,
Lorenzo Pieralisi <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4/5] perf: arm: pmu: fix reference leak on failed device registration
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 09:50:26 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505-bold-kind-herring-2c7eef@sudeepholla> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <243cb3737b41fae32a09117c17809a210395e69f.1777889235.git.vebohr@gmail.com>
On Mon, May 04, 2026 at 01:08:46PM +0300, Vastargazing wrote:
> When platform_device_register() fails in arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(),
> the embedded struct device has already been initialized by
> device_initialize() inside platform_device_register(). The error path
> unregisters the GSI interrupt but returns without dropping the device
> reference:
>
> arm_acpi_register_pmu_device()
> -> platform_device_register(pdev)
> -> device_initialize(&pdev->dev) /* kref = 1 */
> -> platform_device_add(pdev) /* fails */
> <- acpi_unregister_gsi() called, but kref still 1
>
> Per platform_device_register() kernel-doc:
>
> NOTE: _Never_ directly free @pdev after calling this function, even if
> it returned an error! Always use platform_device_put() to give up the
> reference initialised in this function instead.
>
> Fix this by calling platform_device_put() in the error branch before
> unregistering the GSI.
>
> Fixes: d24a0c7099b3 ("arm_pmu: acpi: spe: Add initial MADT/SPE probing")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Assisted-by: GitHub Copilot (Claude Sonnet 4.5)
> Signed-off-by: Vastargazing <vebohr@gmail.com>
> ---
> drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> index e80f76d95e68..c2defbc32ad9 100644
> --- a/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> +++ b/drivers/perf/arm_pmu_acpi.c
> @@ -119,8 +119,10 @@ arm_acpi_register_pmu_device(struct platform_device *pdev, u8 len,
>
> pdev->resource[0].start = irq;
> ret = platform_device_register(pdev);
> - if (ret)
> + if (ret) {
> + platform_device_put(pdev);
Both spe_dev and trbe_dev using this are statically allocated, what am I
missing here ? What will platform_device_put() do ?
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 8:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <cover.1777889235.git.vebohr@gmail.com>
2026-05-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 1/5] misc: eeprom: digsy_mtc: fix reference leak on failed device registration Vastargazing
2026-05-04 10:08 ` Vastargazing
2026-05-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 2/5] platform/chrome: cros_ec_lpc: " Vastargazing
2026-05-04 10:08 ` Vastargazing
2026-05-05 2:40 ` Tzung-Bi Shih
2026-05-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: maps: physmap: " Vastargazing
2026-05-04 10:08 ` Vastargazing
2026-05-04 13:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-05-04 13:58 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-05-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 4/5] perf: arm: pmu: " Vastargazing
2026-05-04 10:08 ` Vastargazing
2026-05-04 11:47 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-05 8:50 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2026-05-04 10:08 ` [PATCH 5/5] mfd: sm501: " Vastargazing
2026-05-04 10:08 ` Vastargazing
2026-05-04 12:48 ` [PATCH v2] " Valery Borovsky
2026-05-04 13:52 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-05-05 15:00 ` Lee Jones
2026-05-05 15:12 ` Miquel Raynal
2026-05-06 15:40 ` [PATCH v3] " Valery Borovsky
2026-05-14 14:54 ` Lee Jones
2026-05-14 16:26 ` Valery Borovsky
2026-05-05 10:36 ` [PATCH 1/5] perf/arm_pmu_acpi: fix reference leak in arm_pmu_acpi_probe error path Valery Borovsky
2026-05-05 10:36 ` Valery Borovsky
2026-05-06 15:43 ` [PATCH 3/5] mtd: maps: physmap-core: fix reference leak on failed device registration Valery Borovsky
2026-05-06 15:43 ` Valery Borovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505-bold-kind-herring-2c7eef@sudeepholla \
--to=sudeep.holla@kernel.org \
--cc=jeremy.linton@arm.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=vebohr@gmail.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.