From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@intel.com>
Cc: oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev, lkp@intel.com,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
K Prateek Nayak <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>,
Shubhang Kaushik <shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com>,
aubrey.li@linux.intel.com, yu.c.chen@intel.com
Subject: Re: [linus:master] [sched/fair] 4823725d9d: INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 17:29:18 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505152918.GY3126523@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <202605052050.8156b7e0-lkp@intel.com>
On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 09:19:49PM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
>
> Hello,
>
>
> for this change "sched/fair: Increase weight bits for avg_vruntime", we reported
> "[peterz-queue:sched/hrtick] [sched/fair] fb047eb995: Oops:general_protection_fault,probably_for_non-canonical_address#:#[##]KASAN_PTI"
> in [1]
>
> but we cannot reproduce the issue in [1] now with same tests and the same
> x86_64-randconfig as the kbuild input config for 4823725d9d.
>
> however, with another i386-randconfig in boot tests, we found some random
> issues for this change which are clean on parent.
Much of that branch has since made its way upstream -- with various bugs
fixed. Can any of this be reproduced on tip/sched/urgent ?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 15:29 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 13:19 [linus:master] [sched/fair] 4823725d9d: INFO:task_blocked_for_more_than#seconds kernel test robot
2026-05-05 15:29 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-06 7:06 ` Oliver Sang
2026-05-06 7:48 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-06 8:09 ` Oliver Sang
2026-05-06 8:23 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-09 8:37 ` Oliver Sang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505152918.GY3126523@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=aubrey.li@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=oe-lkp@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=oliver.sang@intel.com \
--cc=shubhang@os.amperecomputing.com \
--cc=yu.c.chen@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.