From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org,
Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>, Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>,
NeilBrown <neil@brown.name>, Boqun Feng <boqun@kernel.org>,
Joel Fernandes <joelagnelf@nvidia.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 20/25] d_walk(): shrink rcu_read_lock() scope
Date: Tue, 5 May 2026 23:50:28 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260505225028.GI3518998@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <afpj3FBrvHer0E6Y@pavilion.home>
On Tue, May 05, 2026 at 11:40:44PM +0200, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> > FWIW, back in 2015 spin_lock() did *not* provide an RCU read-side critical
> > area, according to https://lwn.net/Articles/652156/; would be nice to have
> > the history mentioned in D/RCU/whatisRCU.rst - at least to the level of
> > "once upon a time one *did* need an explicit rcu_read_lock() in addition
> > to spin_lock() - spin_lock() or preempt_disable() alone was not enough;
> > that has changed in <...>".
> >
> > I'm not familiar enough with that code for that kind of archaeology ;-/
> > Could somebody help with that? Paul?
>
> That's quite outdated. Now preempt disabled, IRQs disabled, and spinlocks
> are all implicit RCU read sides. On non RT spinlocks disable preemption and
> on RT they call rcu_read_lock() internally.
Out of curiosity, how much headache do bitlocks cause on RT? I mean, they
are unconditionally disabling preemption, RT or no RT...
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-05 22:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 76+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-05 5:53 [RFC PATCH 00/25] assorted dcache cleanups and fixes Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 01/25] VFS: use wait_var_event for waiting in d_alloc_parallel() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 02/25] alloc_path_pseudo(): make sure we don't end up with NORCU dentries for directories Al Viro
2026-05-05 8:21 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-05 17:48 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 03/25] fix a race between d_find_any_alias() and final dput() of NORCU dentries Al Viro
2026-05-05 17:06 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 20:29 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 04/25] find_acceptable_alias(): skip NORCU aliases with zero refcount Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 05/25] select_collect(): ignore dentries on shrink lists if they have positive refcounts Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 06/25] make to_shrink_list() return whether it has moved dentry to list Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 07/25] kill d_dispose_if_unused() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 08/25] d_prune_aliases(): make sure to skip NORCU aliases Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 09/25] shrink_dentry_list(): start with removing from shrink list Al Viro
2026-05-07 20:39 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 10/25] fold lock_for_kill() into shrink_kill() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 11/25] fold lock_for_kill() and __dentry_kill() into common helper Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:53 ` [RFC PATCH 12/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 1 Al Viro
2026-05-05 8:55 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-05 14:22 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 21:58 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-05 16:47 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 22:42 ` Al Viro
2026-05-07 7:35 ` Al Viro
2026-05-07 15:32 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 13/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 2 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 14/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 3 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 15/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 4 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 16/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 5 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 17/25] reducing rcu_read_lock() scopes in dput and friends, step 6 Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 18/25] adjust calling conventions of lock_for_kill(), fold __dentry_kill() into dentry_kill() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 19/25] document dentry_kill() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 20/25] d_walk(): shrink rcu_read_lock() scope Al Viro
2026-05-05 17:01 ` Linus Torvalds
2026-05-05 20:05 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 21:40 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2026-05-05 22:50 ` Al Viro [this message]
2026-05-06 3:49 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-07 22:39 ` NeilBrown
2026-05-07 23:21 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-08 14:47 ` Al Viro
2026-05-08 22:03 ` Paul E. McKenney
2026-05-08 23:03 ` Al Viro
2026-05-08 3:01 ` Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 21/25] shrinking rcu_read_lock() scope in d_alloc_parallel() Al Viro
2026-05-07 21:52 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-05-08 3:12 ` Al Viro
2026-05-08 9:28 ` Jori Koolstra
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 22/25] shrink_dentry_tree(): unify the calls of shrink_dentry_list() Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 23/25] wind ->s_roots via ->d_sib instead of ->d_hash Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 24/25] nfs: get rid of fake root dentries Al Viro
2026-05-05 5:54 ` [RFC PATCH 25/25] make cursors NORCU Al Viro
2026-05-05 17:09 ` [RFC PATCH 00/25] assorted dcache cleanups and fixes Linus Torvalds
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 00/22] " Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 01/22] VFS: use wait_var_event for waiting in d_alloc_parallel() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 02/22] alloc_path_pseudo(): make sure we don't end up with NORCU dentries for directories Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 03/22] fix a race between d_find_any_alias() and final dput() of NORCU dentries Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 04/22] find_acceptable_alias(): skip NORCU aliases with zero refcount Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 05/22] select_collect(): ignore dentries on shrink lists if they have positive refcounts Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 06/22] make to_shrink_list() return whether it has moved dentry to list Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 07/22] kill d_dispose_if_unused() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 08/22] d_prune_aliases(): make sure to skip NORCU aliases Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 09/22] shrink_dentry_list(): start with removing from shrink list Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 10/22] fold lock_for_kill() into shrink_kill() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:08 ` [PATCH v2 11/22] fold lock_for_kill() and __dentry_kill() into common helper Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 12/22] simplify safety for lock_for_kill() slowpath Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 13/22] Shift rcu_read_{,un}lock() inside fast_dput() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 14/22] Document rcu_read_lock() use in select_collect2() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 15/22] adjust calling conventions of lock_for_kill(), fold __dentry_kill() into dentry_kill() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 16/22] document dentry_kill() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 17/22] d_walk(): shrink rcu_read_lock() scope Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 18/22] shrinking rcu_read_lock() scope in d_alloc_parallel() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 19/22] shrink_dentry_tree(): unify the calls of shrink_dentry_list() Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 20/22] wind ->s_roots via ->d_sib instead of ->d_hash Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 21/22] nfs: get rid of fake root dentries Al Viro
2026-06-05 5:09 ` [PATCH v2 22/22] make cursors NORCU Al Viro
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260505225028.GI3518998@ZenIV \
--to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
--cc=boqun@kernel.org \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jack@suse.cz \
--cc=joelagnelf@nvidia.com \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neil@brown.name \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.