All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>
To: Stefano Garzarella <sgarzare@redhat.com>
Cc: "Eric Dumazet" <edumazet@google.com>,
	"Arseniy Krasnov" <avkrasnov@salutedevices.com>,
	"Bobby Eshleman" <bobbyeshleman@meta.com>,
	"Stefan Hajnoczi" <stefanha@redhat.com>,
	"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
	"Jakub Kicinski" <kuba@kernel.org>,
	"Paolo Abeni" <pabeni@redhat.com>,
	"Simon Horman" <horms@kernel.org>,
	netdev@vger.kernel.org, eric.dumazet@gmail.com,
	"Arseniy Krasnov" <AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru>,
	"Jason Wang" <jasowang@redhat.com>,
	"Xuan Zhuo" <xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com>,
	"Eugenio Pérez" <eperezma@redhat.com>,
	kvm@vger.kernel.org, virtualization@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 05:58:06 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508055343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <af2sXvVCBT05XF0D@sgarzare-redhat>

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 11:41:21AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 06:48:47PM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 02:59:13PM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 07:45:10AM -0400, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > > > On Thu, May 07, 2026 at 11:09:47AM +0200, Stefano Garzarella wrote:
> 
> [...]
> 
> > > > > For now, we're already doing something:
> > > > > merging the skuffs if they don't have EOM set.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > Right that's good. You could go further and merge with EOM too
> > > > if you stick the info about message boundaries somewhere else.
> > > 
> > > This adds a lot of complexity IMO, but we can try.
> > > 
> > > Do you have something in mind?
> > 
> > BER is clearly overkill but here's a POC that claude made for me,
> > just to give u an idea. It's clearly has a ton of issues,
> > for example I dislike how GFP_ATOMIC is handled.
> 
> Okay, I somewhat understand, but clearly this isn't net material

I doubt we have many other options given reverting the regression was
ruled out.


> so for now
> I think the best thing to do is to merge the fixup I sent (or something
> similar):
> https://lore.kernel.org/netdev/20260508092330.69690-1-sgarzare@redhat.com/

I reviewed that one, problem is it's a spec violation/change that we'll
have to support forever. 

> This is a major change that should be merged with more caution.
> Could this have too much of an impact on performance?
> 
> Thanks,
> Stefano

It's really a POC, real patch is left as an excersise for the reader :).
The correct approach IMHO is to only start using this
when we wasted a lot of memory on small packets.

For example, if sum(truesize) >= buf size.

then we'll not see a perf impact unless it's already pathological.


> > Yet it seems to work fine in light testing.
> > 
> > -->
> > 
> > 
> > vsock/virtio: use DWARF ULEB128 to record EOM boundaries, enable cross-EOM skb coalescing
> > 
> > virtio_transport_recv_enqueue() currently refuses to coalesce an
> > incoming skb with the previous one when the previous skb carries
> > VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM.  This forces one skb per seqpacket message.
> > For workloads with many small or zero-byte messages the per-skb
> > overhead (~960 bytes) dominates, causing unbounded memory growth.
> > 
> > Decouple message boundary tracking from the skb structure: store
> > boundary offsets in a compact side buffer using DWARF ULEB128
> > encoding with the EOR flag folded into the low bit, then allow
> > the data of multiple complete messages to be coalesced into a single
> > skb.
> > 
> > Cross-EOM coalescing fires only when:
> > - both the tail skb and the incoming packet carry EOM (complete msgs)
> > - the incoming packet fits in the tail skb's tailroom
> > - no BPF psock is attached (read_skb expects one msg per skb)
> > 
> > On allocation failure the code falls back to separate skbs (existing
> > behaviour).  Credit accounting is unchanged; the boundary buffer is
> > capped at PAGE_SIZE.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Michael S. Tsirkin <mst@redhat.com>
> > Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
> > 
> > diff --git a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > index f91704731057..e36b9ab28372 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/virtio_vsock.h
> > @@ -12,6 +12,7 @@
> > struct virtio_vsock_skb_cb {
> > 	bool reply;
> > 	bool tap_delivered;
> > +	bool has_boundary_entries;
> > 	u32 offset;
> > };
> > 
> > @@ -167,6 +168,12 @@ struct virtio_vsock_sock {
> > 	u32 buf_used;
> > 	struct sk_buff_head rx_queue;
> > 	u32 msg_count;
> > +
> > +	/* ULEB128-encoded seqpacket message boundary buffer */
> > +	u8 *boundary_buf;
> > +	u32 boundary_len;
> > +	u32 boundary_alloc;
> > +	u32 boundary_off;
> > };
> > 
> > struct virtio_vsock_pkt_info {
> > diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > index 416d533f493d..81654f70f72c 100644
> > --- a/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/virtio_transport_common.c
> > @@ -11,6 +11,7 @@
> > #include <linux/sched/signal.h>
> > #include <linux/ctype.h>
> > #include <linux/list.h>
> > +#include <linux/skmsg.h>
> > #include <linux/virtio_vsock.h>
> > #include <uapi/linux/vsockmon.h>
> > 
> > @@ -26,6 +27,91 @@
> > /* Threshold for detecting small packets to copy */
> > #define GOOD_COPY_LEN  128
> > 
> > +#define VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_INIT	64
> > +#define VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX	PAGE_SIZE
> > +
> > +/* ULEB128 boundary encoding: value = (msg_len << 1) | eor.
> > + * Each byte carries 7 data bits; bit 7 is set on all but the last byte.
> > + * Max 5 bytes for a u32 msg_len (33 bits with eor shift).
> > + */
> > +static int vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(u8 *buf, u32 msg_len, bool eor)
> > +{
> > +	u64 val = ((u64)msg_len << 1) | eor;
> > +	int n = 0;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		buf[n] = val & 0x7f;
> > +		val >>= 7;
> > +		if (val)
> > +			buf[n] |= 0x80;
> > +		n++;
> > +	} while (val);
> > +
> > +	return n;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(const u8 *buf, u32 avail,
> > +				      u32 *msg_len, bool *eor)
> > +{
> > +	u64 val = 0;
> > +	int shift = 0;
> > +	int n = 0;
> > +
> > +	do {
> > +		if (n >= avail || shift >= 35)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		val |= (u64)(buf[n] & 0x7f) << shift;
> > +		shift += 7;
> > +	} while (buf[n++] & 0x80);
> > +
> > +	*eor = val & 1;
> > +	*msg_len = val >> 1;
> > +	return n;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void vsock_boundary_buf_compact(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs)
> > +{
> > +	if (vvs->boundary_off == 0)
> > +		return;
> > +
> > +	vvs->boundary_len -= vvs->boundary_off;
> > +	memmove(vvs->boundary_buf, vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
> > +		vvs->boundary_len);
> > +	vvs->boundary_off = 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int vsock_boundary_buf_ensure(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs, u32 needed)
> > +{
> > +	u32 new_alloc;
> > +	u8 *new_buf;
> > +
> > +	if (vvs->boundary_alloc >= needed)
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	/* Reclaim consumed space before growing */
> > +	if (vvs->boundary_off) {
> > +		needed -= vvs->boundary_off;
> > +		vsock_boundary_buf_compact(vvs);
> > +		if (vvs->boundary_alloc >= needed)
> > +			return 0;
> > +	}
> > +
> > +	new_alloc = max(needed, vvs->boundary_alloc ? vvs->boundary_alloc * 2
> > +						    : VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_INIT);
> > +	if (new_alloc > VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX)
> > +		new_alloc = VSOCK_BOUNDARY_BUF_MAX;
> > +	if (new_alloc < needed)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	new_buf = krealloc(vvs->boundary_buf, new_alloc, GFP_ATOMIC);
> > +	if (!new_buf)
> > +		return -ENOMEM;
> > +
> > +	vvs->boundary_buf = new_buf;
> > +	vvs->boundary_alloc = new_alloc;
> > +	return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > static void virtio_transport_cancel_close_work(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 					       bool cancel_timeout);
> > static s64 virtio_transport_has_space(struct virtio_vsock_sock *vvs);
> > @@ -682,41 +768,74 @@ virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_peek(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 	total = 0;
> > 	len = msg_data_left(msg);
> > 
> > -	skb_queue_walk(&vvs->rx_queue, skb) {
> > -		struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > +	skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > +	if (skb && VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> > +		u32 msg_len, offset;
> > +		size_t bytes;
> > +		bool eor;
> > +		int ret;
> > 
> > -		if (total < len) {
> > -			size_t bytes;
> > +		ret = vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(
> > +			vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
> > +			vvs->boundary_len - vvs->boundary_off,
> > +			&msg_len, &eor);
> > +		if (ret < 0)
> > +			goto unlock;
> > +
> > +		offset = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset;
> > +		bytes = min(len, (size_t)msg_len);
> > +
> > +		if (bytes) {
> > 			int err;
> > 
> > -			bytes = len - total;
> > -			if (bytes > skb->len)
> > -				bytes = skb->len;
> > -
> > 			spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > -
> > -			/* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
> > -			 * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep.
> > -			 */
> > -			err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
> > +			err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, offset,
> > 						     &msg->msg_iter, bytes);
> > 			if (err)
> > 				return err;
> > -
> > 			spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > 		}
> > 
> > -		total += skb->len;
> > -		hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > +		total = msg_len;
> > +		if (eor)
> > +			msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > +	} else {
> > +		skb_queue_walk(&vvs->rx_queue, skb) {
> > +			struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > 
> > -		if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > -			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > -				msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > +			if (total < len) {
> > +				size_t bytes;
> > +				int err;
> > 
> > -			break;
> > +				bytes = len - total;
> > +				if (bytes > skb->len)
> > +					bytes = skb->len;
> > +
> > +				spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > +
> > +				err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(
> > +					skb,
> > +					VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset,
> > +					&msg->msg_iter, bytes);
> > +				if (err)
> > +					return err;
> > +
> > +				spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			total += skb->len;
> > +			hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > +
> > +			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > +				if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
> > +				    VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > +					msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > +				break;
> > +			}
> > 		}
> > 	}
> > 
> > +unlock:
> > 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > 
> > 	return total;
> > @@ -740,57 +859,105 @@ static int virtio_transport_seqpacket_do_dequeue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	while (!msg_ready) {
> > -		struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > -		size_t pkt_len;
> > -
> > -		skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > +		skb = skb_peek(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > 		if (!skb)
> > 			break;
> > -		hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > -		pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
> > 
> > -		if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
> > +		if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> > 			size_t bytes_to_copy;
> > +			u32 msg_len, offset;
> > +			bool eor;
> > +			int ret;
> > 
> > -			bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
> > +			ret = vsock_uleb_decode_boundary(
> > +				vvs->boundary_buf + vvs->boundary_off,
> > +				vvs->boundary_len - vvs->boundary_off,
> > +				&msg_len, &eor);
> > +			if (ret < 0)
> > +				break;
> > +			vvs->boundary_off += ret;
> > 
> > -			if (bytes_to_copy) {
> > +			offset = VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset;
> > +			bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, (size_t)msg_len);
> > +
> > +			if (bytes_to_copy && dequeued_len >= 0) {
> > 				int err;
> > 
> > -				/* sk_lock is held by caller so no one else can dequeue.
> > -				 * Unlock rx_lock since skb_copy_datagram_iter() may sleep.
> > -				 */
> > 				spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > -
> > -				err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, 0,
> > +				err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(skb, offset,
> > 							     &msg->msg_iter,
> > 							     bytes_to_copy);
> > -				if (err) {
> > -					/* Copy of message failed. Rest of
> > -					 * fragments will be freed without copy.
> > -					 */
> > -					dequeued_len = err;
> > -				} else {
> > -					user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> > -				}
> > -
> > 				spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > +				if (err)
> > +					dequeued_len = err;
> > +				else
> > +					user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> > 			}
> > 
> > 			if (dequeued_len >= 0)
> > -				dequeued_len += pkt_len;
> > -		}
> > +				dequeued_len += msg_len;
> > 
> > -		if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > +			VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset += msg_len;
> > 			msg_ready = true;
> > 			vvs->msg_count--;
> > 
> > -			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > +			if (eor)
> > 				msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > -		}
> > 
> > -		virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len, pkt_len);
> > -		kfree_skb(skb);
> > +			virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, msg_len, msg_len);
> > +
> > +			if (VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(skb)->offset >= skb->len) {
> > +				__skb_unlink(skb, &vvs->rx_queue);
> > +				kfree_skb(skb);
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			if (vvs->boundary_off >= vvs->boundary_len / 2)
> > +				vsock_boundary_buf_compact(vvs);
> > +		} else {
> > +			struct virtio_vsock_hdr *hdr;
> > +			size_t pkt_len;
> > +
> > +			skb = __skb_dequeue(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > +			if (!skb)
> > +				break;
> > +			hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(skb);
> > +			pkt_len = (size_t)le32_to_cpu(hdr->len);
> > +
> > +			if (dequeued_len >= 0) {
> > +				size_t bytes_to_copy;
> > +
> > +				bytes_to_copy = min(user_buf_len, pkt_len);
> > +
> > +				if (bytes_to_copy) {
> > +					int err;
> > +
> > +					spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > +					err = skb_copy_datagram_iter(
> > +						skb, 0, &msg->msg_iter,
> > +						bytes_to_copy);
> > +					if (err)
> > +						dequeued_len = err;
> > +					else
> > +						user_buf_len -= bytes_to_copy;
> > +					spin_lock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > +				}
> > +
> > +				if (dequeued_len >= 0)
> > +					dequeued_len += pkt_len;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM) {
> > +				msg_ready = true;
> > +				vvs->msg_count--;
> > +
> > +				if (le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
> > +				    VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR)
> > +					msg->msg_flags |= MSG_EOR;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			virtio_transport_dec_rx_pkt(vvs, pkt_len, pkt_len);
> > +			kfree_skb(skb);
> > +		}
> > 	}
> > 
> > 	spin_unlock_bh(&vvs->rx_lock);
> > @@ -1132,6 +1299,7 @@ void virtio_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > 
> > 	virtio_transport_cancel_close_work(vsk, true);
> > 
> > +	kfree(vvs->boundary_buf);
> > 	kfree(vvs);
> > 	vsk->trans = NULL;
> > }
> > @@ -1224,6 +1392,11 @@ static void virtio_transport_remove_sock(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> > 	 * removing it.
> > 	 */
> > 	__skb_queue_purge(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > +	kfree(vvs->boundary_buf);
> > +	vvs->boundary_buf = NULL;
> > +	vvs->boundary_len = 0;
> > +	vvs->boundary_alloc = 0;
> > +	vvs->boundary_off = 0;
> > 	vsock_remove_sock(vsk);
> > }
> > 
> > @@ -1395,23 +1568,62 @@ virtio_transport_recv_enqueue(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> > 	    !skb_is_nonlinear(skb)) {
> > 		struct virtio_vsock_hdr *last_hdr;
> > 		struct sk_buff *last_skb;
> > +		bool last_has_eom;
> > +		bool has_eom;
> > 
> > 		last_skb = skb_peek_tail(&vvs->rx_queue);
> > 		last_hdr = virtio_vsock_hdr(last_skb);
> > +		last_has_eom = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
> > +		has_eom = le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM;
> > 
> > -		/* If there is space in the last packet queued, we copy the
> > -		 * new packet in its buffer. We avoid this if the last packet
> > -		 * queued has VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM set, because this is
> > -		 * delimiter of SEQPACKET message, so 'pkt' is the first packet
> > -		 * of a new message.
> > -		 */
> > -		if (skb->len < skb_tailroom(last_skb) &&
> > -		    !(le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) & VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOM)) {
> > -			memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len), skb->data, skb->len);
> > -			free_pkt = true;
> > -			last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
> > -			le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
> > -			goto out;
> > +		if (skb->len < skb_tailroom(last_skb)) {
> > +			if (!last_has_eom) {
> > +				/* Same-message coalescing (existing path) */
> > +				memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len),
> > +				       skb->data, skb->len);
> > +				free_pkt = true;
> > +				last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
> > +				le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
> > +				goto out;
> > +			}
> > +
> > +			/* Cross-EOM: coalesce complete messages into one skb,
> > +			 * recording message boundaries in a compact BER buffer.
> > +			 * Only when incoming packet also has EOM (complete msg).
> > +			 */
> > +			if (has_eom && !sk_psock(sk_vsock(vsk))) {
> > +				bool prev_eor, cur_eor;
> > +				u8 tmp[12];
> > +				int n = 0;
> > +
> > +				cur_eor = le32_to_cpu(hdr->flags) &
> > +					  VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
> > +
> > +				if (!VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(last_skb)->has_boundary_entries) {
> > +					u32 prev_len = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->len);
> > +
> > +					prev_eor = le32_to_cpu(last_hdr->flags) &
> > +						   VIRTIO_VSOCK_SEQ_EOR;
> > +					n += vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(
> > +						tmp + n, prev_len, prev_eor);
> > +				}
> > +				n += vsock_uleb_encode_boundary(
> > +					tmp + n, len, cur_eor);
> > +
> > +				if (!vsock_boundary_buf_ensure(
> > +					    vvs, vvs->boundary_len + n)) {
> > +					memcpy(vvs->boundary_buf +
> > +					       vvs->boundary_len, tmp, n);
> > +					vvs->boundary_len += n;
> > +					VIRTIO_VSOCK_SKB_CB(last_skb)->has_boundary_entries = true;
> > +					memcpy(skb_put(last_skb, skb->len),
> > +					       skb->data, skb->len);
> > +					free_pkt = true;
> > +					last_hdr->flags |= hdr->flags;
> > +					le32_add_cpu(&last_hdr->len, len);
> > +					goto out;
> > +				}
> > +			}
> > 		}
> > 	}
> > 
> > 


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08  9:58 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-04-30 12:26 [PATCH net] vsock/virtio: fix potential unbounded skb queue Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05  2:20 ` patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
2026-05-05 13:51 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-05 14:14   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-05 16:11     ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-05 16:37       ` Bobby Eshleman
2026-05-06  9:50         ` Arseniy Krasnov
2026-05-06 14:00           ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-06 15:37       ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07  9:09         ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 11:45           ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 12:59             ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 14:33               ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-07 16:05                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 16:32                   ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-07 17:18                     ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-08  9:26                       ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-07 14:52               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-07 22:48               ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08  9:41                 ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-08  9:43                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-08  9:58                   ` Michael S. Tsirkin [this message]
2026-05-08 10:11                     ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-23 21:00                       ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-05-25  2:37                         ` Demi Marie Obenour
2026-05-25  9:14                           ` Stefano Garzarella
2026-05-06 15:15     ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2026-05-06 15:38       ` Eric Dumazet
2026-05-06 15:49         ` Michael S. Tsirkin

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508055343-mutt-send-email-mst@kernel.org \
    --to=mst@redhat.com \
    --cc=AVKrasnov@sberdevices.ru \
    --cc=avkrasnov@salutedevices.com \
    --cc=bobbyeshleman@meta.com \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
    --cc=eric.dumazet@gmail.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=jasowang@redhat.com \
    --cc=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    --cc=sgarzare@redhat.com \
    --cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
    --cc=virtualization@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=xuanzhuo@linux.alibaba.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.