All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Marc Kleine-Budde <mkl@pengutronix.de>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org, davem@davemloft.net,
	linux-can@vger.kernel.org, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	Lee Jones <lee@kernel.org>,
	Oliver Hartkopp <socketcan@hartkopp.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 2/6] can: bcm: prevent thrtimer UAF in rx path by checking RX_NO_AUTOTIMER
Date: Fri, 8 May 2026 15:12:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260508151237.7d0a9105@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260507112321.439968-3-mkl@pengutronix.de>

On Thu,  7 May 2026 10:22:24 +0200 Marc Kleine-Budde wrote:
> Commit f1b4e32aca08 ("can: bcm: use call_rcu() instead of costly
> synchronize_rcu()") removed the synchronize_rcu() call from
> bcm_delete_rx_op() and introduced the RX_NO_AUTOTIMER flag to prevent
> timers from being rearmed during deletion.  However, it only applied
> this check to op->timer via bcm_rx_starttimer().

All AIs point out this is insufficient:

    reader (bcm_rx_handler, RCU) | writer (bcm_delete_rx_op)
    -----------------------------+-------------------------------
    test op->flags (no AUTOTIMER)|
                                 | op->flags |= RX_NO_AUTOTIMER
                                 | bcm_remove_op()
                                 |   hrtimer_cancel(&op->thrtimer)
                                 |     /* not armed: no-op */
                                 | call_rcu(bcm_free_op_rcu)
    hrtimer_start(&op->thrtimer) |
    return from RCU section      |
                                 | grace period elapses
                                 | bcm_free_op_rcu() -> kfree(op)
    thrtimer fires               |
      bcm_rx_thr_handler(op)     | <-- UAF

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-08 22:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-07  8:22 [PATCH net 0/6] pull-request: can 2026-05-07 Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07  8:22 ` [PATCH net 1/6] can: raw: add locking for raw flags bitfield Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07  8:22 ` [PATCH net 2/6] can: bcm: prevent thrtimer UAF in rx path by checking RX_NO_AUTOTIMER Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-08 22:12   ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-05-13 13:59     ` Lee Jones
2026-05-13 14:17       ` Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-13 15:00         ` Lee Jones
2026-05-07  8:22 ` [PATCH net 3/6] can: j1939: fix wrong RX timeout for CTS hold messages Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07  8:22 ` [PATCH net 4/6] can: j1939: fix lockless local-destination check Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07  8:22 ` [PATCH net 5/6] can: peak: Modification of references to email accounts being deleted Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-07  8:22 ` [PATCH net 6/6] can: flexcan: disable all IRQ lines in flexcan_chip_interrupts_enable() Marc Kleine-Budde
2026-05-08 22:11   ` Jakub Kicinski
2026-05-13 14:17     ` Marc Kleine-Budde

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260508151237.7d0a9105@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=lee@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-can@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mkl@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=socketcan@hartkopp.net \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.