All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
To: mptcp@lists.linux.dev
Cc: matttbe@kernel.org, martineau@kernel.org, geliang@kernel.org,
	pabeni@redhat.com, David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
Subject: [PATCH mptcp-next v7 2/4] mptcp: propagate RECVERR sockopts to subflows
Date: Sat,  9 May 2026 22:16:45 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260509211651.104934-3-devnexen@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509211651.104934-1-devnexen@gmail.com>

Propagate IP_RECVERR/IP_RECVERR_RFC4884 and
IPV6_RECVERR/IPV6_RECVERR_RFC4884 from the MPTCP socket to existing
and future subflows.

mptcp_setsockopt_recverr() snapshots optval into a local int, applies
it to the parent socket via ip_setsockopt() / ipv6_setsockopt(), bumps
msk->setsockopt_seq, and forwards to every subflow via
mptcp_setsockopt_all_sf(). Newly-joining subflows pick up the four
RECVERR bits through sync_socket_options() now that
MPTCP_INET_FLAGS_MASK covers them.

mptcp_setsockopt_all_sf() skips IPv4 subflows when called with
SOL_IPV6 to avoid the -ENOPROTOOPT that ip_setsockopt() returns on
level mismatch in AF_INET6 msks carrying IPv4 subflows.

Suggested-by: Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>
Assisted-by: Codex:gpt-5
Signed-off-by: David Carlier <devnexen@gmail.com>
---
 net/mptcp/sockopt.c | 133 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 109 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)

diff --git a/net/mptcp/sockopt.c b/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
index 114436d2e401..fbbd1692af7e 100644
--- a/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
+++ b/net/mptcp/sockopt.c
@@ -8,6 +8,8 @@
 
 #include <linux/kernel.h>
 #include <linux/module.h>
+#include <net/ip.h>
+#include <net/ipv6.h>
 #include <net/sock.h>
 #include <net/protocol.h>
 #include <net/tcp.h>
@@ -19,7 +21,11 @@
 #define MPTCP_INET_FLAGS_MASK \
 	(BIT(INET_FLAGS_TRANSPARENT) | \
 	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_FREEBIND) | \
-	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT))
+	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_BIND_ADDRESS_NO_PORT) | \
+	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_RECVERR) | \
+	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_RECVERR_RFC4884) | \
+	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_RECVERR6) | \
+	 BIT(INET_FLAGS_RECVERR6_RFC4884))
 
 static struct sock *__mptcp_tcp_fallback(struct mptcp_sock *msk)
 {
@@ -394,6 +400,81 @@ static int mptcp_setsockopt_sol_socket(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 }
 
+static int mptcp_setsockopt_all_sf(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int level,
+				   int optname, sockptr_t optval,
+				   unsigned int optlen)
+{
+	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
+	int ret = 0;
+
+	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
+		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
+
+		if (level == SOL_IPV6 && ssk->sk_family != AF_INET6)
+			continue;
+
+		ret = tcp_setsockopt(ssk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+		if (ret)
+			break;
+	}
+
+	if (!ret)
+		sockopt_seq_inc(msk);
+
+	return ret;
+}
+
+static int mptcp_setsockopt_recverr(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int level,
+				    int optname, sockptr_t optval,
+				    unsigned int optlen)
+{
+	struct sock *sk = (struct sock *)msk;
+	int val, ret;
+
+	/* Let ip_setsockopt() / ipv6_setsockopt() validate optval and optlen
+	 * (so 1-byte boolean writes keep the same ABI as plain TCP) and update
+	 * the parent's RECVERR bit. Re-read that bit under lock_sock() and
+	 * push it to the subflows: concurrent setsockopt callers cannot leave
+	 * parent and subflows desynchronized this way.
+	 */
+	if (level == SOL_IP)
+		ret = ip_setsockopt(sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	else if (level == SOL_IPV6)
+		ret = ipv6_setsockopt(sk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
+#endif
+	else
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	if (ret)
+		return ret;
+
+	lock_sock(sk);
+	switch (optname) {
+	case IP_RECVERR:
+		val = inet_test_bit(RECVERR, sk);
+		break;
+	case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
+		val = inet_test_bit(RECVERR_RFC4884, sk);
+		break;
+#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_IPV6)
+	case IPV6_RECVERR:
+		val = inet6_test_bit(RECVERR6, sk);
+		break;
+	case IPV6_RECVERR_RFC4884:
+		val = inet6_test_bit(RECVERR6_RFC4884, sk);
+		break;
+#endif
+	default:
+		release_sock(sk);
+		return -EOPNOTSUPP;
+	}
+
+	ret = mptcp_setsockopt_all_sf(msk, level, optname,
+				      KERNEL_SOCKPTR(&val), sizeof(val));
+	release_sock(sk);
+	return ret;
+}
+
 static int mptcp_setsockopt_v6(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 			       sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
 {
@@ -436,6 +517,10 @@ static int mptcp_setsockopt_v6(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 
 		release_sock(sk);
 		break;
+	case IPV6_RECVERR:
+	case IPV6_RECVERR_RFC4884:
+		ret = mptcp_setsockopt_recverr(msk, SOL_IPV6, optname, optval, optlen);
+		break;
 	}
 
 	return ret;
@@ -781,6 +866,9 @@ static int mptcp_setsockopt_v4(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 		return mptcp_setsockopt_sol_ip_set(msk, optname, optval, optlen);
 	case IP_TOS:
 		return mptcp_setsockopt_v4_set_tos(msk, optname, optval, optlen);
+	case IP_RECVERR:
+	case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
+		return mptcp_setsockopt_recverr(msk, SOL_IP, optname, optval, optlen);
 	}
 
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -808,27 +896,6 @@ static int mptcp_setsockopt_first_sf_only(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int level, int
 	return ret;
 }
 
-static int mptcp_setsockopt_all_sf(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int level,
-				   int optname, sockptr_t optval,
-				   unsigned int optlen)
-{
-	struct mptcp_subflow_context *subflow;
-	int ret = 0;
-
-	mptcp_for_each_subflow(msk, subflow) {
-		struct sock *ssk = mptcp_subflow_tcp_sock(subflow);
-
-		ret = tcp_setsockopt(ssk, level, optname, optval, optlen);
-		if (ret)
-			break;
-	}
-
-	if (!ret)
-		sockopt_seq_inc(msk);
-
-	return ret;
-}
-
 static int mptcp_setsockopt_sol_tcp(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 				    sockptr_t optval, unsigned int optlen)
 {
@@ -932,8 +999,11 @@ int mptcp_setsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 	if (level == SOL_IP)
 		return mptcp_setsockopt_v4(msk, optname, optval, optlen);
 
-	if (level == SOL_IPV6)
+	if (level == SOL_IPV6) {
+		if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET6)
+			return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 		return mptcp_setsockopt_v6(msk, optname, optval, optlen);
+	}
 
 	if (level == SOL_TCP)
 		return mptcp_setsockopt_sol_tcp(msk, optname, optval, optlen);
@@ -1473,6 +1543,12 @@ static int mptcp_getsockopt_v4(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 	case IP_LOCAL_PORT_RANGE:
 		return mptcp_put_int_option(msk, optval, optlen,
 				READ_ONCE(inet_sk(sk)->local_port_range));
+	case IP_RECVERR:
+		return mptcp_put_int_option(msk, optval, optlen,
+				inet_test_bit(RECVERR, sk));
+	case IP_RECVERR_RFC4884:
+		return mptcp_put_int_option(msk, optval, optlen,
+				inet_test_bit(RECVERR_RFC4884, sk));
 	}
 
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -1493,6 +1569,12 @@ static int mptcp_getsockopt_v6(struct mptcp_sock *msk, int optname,
 	case IPV6_FREEBIND:
 		return mptcp_put_int_option(msk, optval, optlen,
 					    inet_test_bit(FREEBIND, sk));
+	case IPV6_RECVERR:
+		return mptcp_put_int_option(msk, optval, optlen,
+					    inet6_test_bit(RECVERR6, sk));
+	case IPV6_RECVERR_RFC4884:
+		return mptcp_put_int_option(msk, optval, optlen,
+					    inet6_test_bit(RECVERR6_RFC4884, sk));
 	}
 
 	return -EOPNOTSUPP;
@@ -1537,8 +1619,11 @@ int mptcp_getsockopt(struct sock *sk, int level, int optname,
 
 	if (level == SOL_IP)
 		return mptcp_getsockopt_v4(msk, optname, optval, option);
-	if (level == SOL_IPV6)
+	if (level == SOL_IPV6) {
+		if (sk->sk_family != AF_INET6)
+			return -ENOPROTOOPT;
 		return mptcp_getsockopt_v6(msk, optname, optval, option);
+	}
 	if (level == SOL_TCP)
 		return mptcp_getsockopt_sol_tcp(msk, optname, optval, option);
 	if (level == SOL_MPTCP)
-- 
2.53.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-09 21:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-09 21:16 [PATCH mptcp-next v7 0/4] mptcp: MSG_ERRQUEUE support on the parent socket David Carlier
2026-05-09 21:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v7 1/4] mptcp: sockopt: factor inet_flags propagation into a mask David Carlier
2026-05-09 21:16 ` David Carlier [this message]
2026-05-09 21:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v7 3/4] mptcp: support MSG_ERRQUEUE on the parent socket David Carlier
2026-05-09 21:16 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v7 4/4] selftests: mptcp: cover IP_RECVERR sockopt propagation David Carlier
2026-05-09 22:24 ` [PATCH mptcp-next v7 0/4] mptcp: MSG_ERRQUEUE support on the parent socket MPTCP CI

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260509211651.104934-3-devnexen@gmail.com \
    --to=devnexen@gmail.com \
    --cc=geliang@kernel.org \
    --cc=martineau@kernel.org \
    --cc=matttbe@kernel.org \
    --cc=mptcp@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.