All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>
To: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
	Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
	James Clark <james.clark@linaro.org>,
	Jiri Olsa <jolsa@kernel.org>, Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>,
	Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>,
	Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>,
	Clark Williams <williams@redhat.com>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org,
	Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>,
	sashiko-bot@kernel.org, Yang Jihong <yangjihong@bytedance.com>,
	"Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context)" <noreply@anthropic.com>
Subject: [PATCH 27/28] perf kwork: Bounds check work->cpu before indexing cpus_runtime[]
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 00:34:18 -0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260510033424.255812-28-acme@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260510033424.255812-1-acme@kernel.org>

From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>

work->cpu comes from sample->cpu which is (u32)-1 when
PERF_SAMPLE_CPU is absent.  Stored as int, this becomes -1
which passes the signed BUG_ON(work->cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS) but
causes an out-of-bounds access on cpus_runtime[-1].

Replace the BUG_ON with an unsigned bounds check that skips
entries with invalid CPU values, and guard the idle and irq
runtime accumulators the same way.

Reported-by: sashiko-bot@kernel.org # Running on a local machine
Cc: Yang Jihong <yangjihong@bytedance.com>
Cc: Ian Rogers <irogers@google.com>
Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>
Assisted-by: Claude Opus 4.6 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
---
 tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c | 49 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
 tools/perf/util/kwork.h    |  1 +
 2 files changed, 44 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)

diff --git a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
index 9d3a4c779a41e383..6e124a0f277c8294 100644
--- a/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
+++ b/tools/perf/builtin-kwork.c
@@ -424,7 +424,9 @@ static bool profile_event_match(struct perf_kwork *kwork,
 	u64 time = sample->time;
 	struct perf_time_interval *ptime = &kwork->ptime;
 
-	if ((kwork->cpu_list != NULL) && !test_bit(cpu, kwork->cpu_bitmap))
+	/* Guard test_bit: cpu == -1 (absent PERF_SAMPLE_CPU) would index past the bitmap */
+	if ((kwork->cpu_list != NULL) &&
+	    ((unsigned int)cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS || !test_bit(cpu, kwork->cpu_bitmap)))
 		return false;
 
 	if (((ptime->start != 0) && (ptime->start > time)) ||
@@ -2008,7 +2010,18 @@ static void top_calc_total_runtime(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
 	next = rb_first_cached(&class->work_root);
 	while (next) {
 		work = rb_entry(next, struct kwork_work, node);
-		BUG_ON(work->cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS);
+		/*
+		 * work->cpu comes from sample->cpu which is -1 when
+		 * PERF_SAMPLE_CPU is absent.  As int that's -1, but as
+		 * unsigned it exceeds MAX_NR_CPUS — skip to avoid OOB
+		 * on cpus_runtime[].
+		 */
+		/* Counted and reported in perf_kwork__top_report() */
+		if ((unsigned int)work->cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS) {
+			stat->nr_skipped_cpu++;
+			next = rb_next(next);
+			continue;
+		}
 		stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].total += work->total_runtime;
 		stat->cpus_runtime[MAX_NR_CPUS].total += work->total_runtime;
 		next = rb_next(next);
@@ -2020,7 +2033,8 @@ static void top_calc_idle_time(struct perf_kwork *kwork,
 {
 	struct kwork_top_stat *stat = &kwork->top_stat;
 
-	if (work->id == 0) {
+	/* See comment in top_calc_total_runtime() */
+	if (work->id == 0 && (unsigned int)work->cpu < MAX_NR_CPUS) {
 		stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].idle += work->total_runtime;
 		stat->cpus_runtime[MAX_NR_CPUS].idle += work->total_runtime;
 	}
@@ -2032,6 +2046,12 @@ static void top_calc_irq_runtime(struct perf_kwork *kwork,
 {
 	struct kwork_top_stat *stat = &kwork->top_stat;
 
+	/* See comment in top_calc_total_runtime() */
+	if ((unsigned int)work->cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS) {
+		stat->nr_skipped_cpu++;
+		return;
+	}
+
 	if (type == KWORK_CLASS_IRQ) {
 		stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].irq += work->total_runtime;
 		stat->cpus_runtime[MAX_NR_CPUS].irq += work->total_runtime;
@@ -2084,12 +2104,21 @@ static void top_calc_cpu_usage(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
 		if (work->total_runtime == 0)
 			goto next;
 
+		/* See comment in top_calc_total_runtime() */
+		if ((unsigned int)work->cpu >= MAX_NR_CPUS) {
+			stat->nr_skipped_cpu++;
+			goto next;
+		}
+
 		__set_bit(work->cpu, stat->all_cpus_bitmap);
 
 		top_subtract_irq_runtime(kwork, work);
 
-		work->cpu_usage = work->total_runtime * 10000 /
-			stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].total;
+		/* Guard against division by zero if no runtime was accumulated */
+		if (stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].total) {
+			work->cpu_usage = work->total_runtime * 10000 /
+				stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].total;
+		}
 
 		top_calc_idle_time(kwork, work);
 next:
@@ -2102,7 +2131,8 @@ static void top_calc_load_runtime(struct perf_kwork *kwork,
 {
 	struct kwork_top_stat *stat = &kwork->top_stat;
 
-	if (work->id != 0) {
+	/* See comment in top_calc_total_runtime() */
+	if (work->id != 0 && (unsigned int)work->cpu < MAX_NR_CPUS) {
 		stat->cpus_runtime[work->cpu].load += work->total_runtime;
 		stat->cpus_runtime[MAX_NR_CPUS].load += work->total_runtime;
 	}
@@ -2170,6 +2200,13 @@ static void perf_kwork__top_report(struct perf_kwork *kwork)
 		next = rb_next(next);
 	}
 
+	if (kwork->top_stat.nr_skipped_cpu) {
+		printf("  Warning: %u work entries with invalid CPU were excluded from totals.\n"
+		       "  Task runtimes may appear inflated (IRQ time not subtracted).\n"
+		       "  Consider re-recording with PERF_SAMPLE_CPU enabled.\n",
+		       kwork->top_stat.nr_skipped_cpu);
+	}
+
 	printf("\n");
 }
 
diff --git a/tools/perf/util/kwork.h b/tools/perf/util/kwork.h
index db00269b73f24c66..10290cd779402f9d 100644
--- a/tools/perf/util/kwork.h
+++ b/tools/perf/util/kwork.h
@@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ struct __top_cpus_runtime {
 struct kwork_top_stat {
 	DECLARE_BITMAP(all_cpus_bitmap, MAX_NR_CPUS);
 	struct __top_cpus_runtime *cpus_runtime;
+	unsigned int nr_skipped_cpu;
 };
 
 struct perf_kwork {
-- 
2.54.0


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-10  3:37 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 44+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-10  3:33 [PATCH 00/28] perf: Harden perf.data parsing against crafted/corrupted files Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 01/28] perf session: Add minimum event size validation table Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-11 19:01   ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 02/28] perf tools: Fix event_contains() macro to verify full field extent Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-11 23:46   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 03/28] perf zstd: Fix compression error path in zstd_compress_stream_to_records() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12  0:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 04/28] perf zstd: Fix multi-iteration decompression and error handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 05/28] perf session: Fix PERF_RECORD_READ swap and dump for variable-length events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 06/28] perf session: Align auxtrace_info priv size before byte-swapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 07/28] perf session: Add validated swap infrastructure with null-termination checks Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12  4:08   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:33 ` [PATCH 08/28] perf session: Use bounded copy for PERF_RECORD_TIME_CONV Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 09/28] perf session: Validate HEADER_ATTR alignment and attr.size before swapping Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 10/28] perf session: Validate nr fields against event size on both swap and common paths Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 11/28] perf header: Byte-swap build ID event pid and bounds check section entries Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 12/28] perf cpumap: Reject RANGE_CPUS with start_cpu > end_cpu Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 21:37   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 13/28] perf auxtrace: Harden auxtrace_error event handling Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 14/28] perf session: Add byte-swap and bounds check for PERF_RECORD_BPF_METADATA events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 22:58   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 15/28] perf header: Validate null-termination in PERF_RECORD_EVENT_UPDATE string fields Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 23:45   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 16/28] perf tools: Bounds check perf_event_attr fields against attr.size before printing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 17/28] perf header: Propagate feature section processing errors Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-13  3:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 18/28] perf header: Validate f_attr.ids section before use in perf_session__read_header() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-13  4:36   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 19/28] perf header: Validate feature section size and add read path bounds checking Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 20/28] perf header: Sanity check HEADER_EVENT_DESC attr.size before swap Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 21/28] perf header: Validate bitmap size before allocating in do_read_bitmap() Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 22/28] perf session: Add byte-swap for PERF_RECORD_COMPRESSED2 events Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 23/28] perf tools: Harden compressed event processing Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-13 21:56   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 24/28] perf session: Check for decompression buffer size overflow Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 25/28] perf session: Bound nr_cpus_avail and validate sample CPU Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 26/28] perf timechart: Bounds check cpu_id and fix topology_map allocation Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-12 18:32   ` Ian Rogers
2026-05-12 19:48     ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-13 23:43   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo [this message]
2026-05-14  0:06   ` [PATCH 27/28] perf kwork: Bounds check work->cpu before indexing cpus_runtime[] sashiko-bot
2026-05-10  3:34 ` [PATCH 28/28] perf test: Add truncated perf.data robustness test Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
2026-05-14  0:18   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260510033424.255812-28-acme@kernel.org \
    --to=acme@kernel.org \
    --cc=acme@redhat.com \
    --cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
    --cc=irogers@google.com \
    --cc=james.clark@linaro.org \
    --cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
    --cc=kan.liang@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
    --cc=noreply@anthropic.com \
    --cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
    --cc=williams@redhat.com \
    --cc=yangjihong@bytedance.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.