From: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
To: Jiakai Xu <xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Cc: llvm@lists.linux.dev, oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev,
"David S . Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>, Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Jiakai Xu <xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] netdevsim: Fix task hung by releasing bus lock before device ops
Date: Sun, 10 May 2026 13:18:57 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260509092837.3432281-1-xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn>
Hi Jiakai,
kernel test robot noticed the following build errors:
[auto build test ERROR on linus/master]
[also build test ERROR on v7.1-rc2 next-20260508]
[cannot apply to horms-ipvs/master]
[If your patch is applied to the wrong git tree, kindly drop us a note.
And when submitting patch, we suggest to use '--base' as documented in
https://git-scm.com/docs/git-format-patch#_base_tree_information]
url: https://github.com/intel-lab-lkp/linux/commits/Jiakai-Xu/netdevsim-Fix-task-hung-by-releasing-bus-lock-before-device-ops/20260510-070550
base: linus/master
patch link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20260509092837.3432281-1-xujiakai24%40mails.ucas.ac.cn
patch subject: [PATCH] netdevsim: Fix task hung by releasing bus lock before device ops
config: hexagon-allmodconfig (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260510/202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com/config)
compiler: clang version 17.0.6 (https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project 6009708b4367171ccdbf4b5905cb6a803753fe18)
reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20260510/202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com/reproduce)
If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of
the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags
| Reported-by: kernel test robot <lkp@intel.com>
| Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com/
All errors (new ones prefixed by >>):
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:192:3: error: call to undeclared function 'nsim_bus_dev_del'; ISO C99 and later do not support implicit function declarations [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
192 | nsim_bus_dev_del(nsim_bus_dev);
| ^
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:192:3: note: did you mean 'nsim_bus_dev_new'?
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:156:1: note: 'nsim_bus_dev_new' declared here
156 | nsim_bus_dev_new(unsigned int id, unsigned int port_count, unsigned int num_queues);
| ^
>> drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:206:13: error: conflicting types for 'nsim_bus_dev_del'
206 | static void nsim_bus_dev_del(struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev);
| ^
drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c:192:3: note: previous implicit declaration is here
192 | nsim_bus_dev_del(nsim_bus_dev);
| ^
2 errors generated.
vim +/nsim_bus_dev_del +192 drivers/net/netdevsim/bus.c
157
158 static ssize_t
159 new_device_store(const struct bus_type *bus, const char *buf, size_t count)
160 {
161 unsigned int id, port_count, num_queues;
162 struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev;
163 int err;
164
165 err = sscanf(buf, "%u %u %u", &id, &port_count, &num_queues);
166 switch (err) {
167 case 1:
168 port_count = 1;
169 fallthrough;
170 case 2:
171 num_queues = 1;
172 fallthrough;
173 case 3:
174 if (id > INT_MAX) {
175 pr_err("Value of \"id\" is too big.\n");
176 return -EINVAL;
177 }
178 break;
179 default:
180 pr_err("Format for adding new device is \"id port_count num_queues\" (uint uint uint).\n");
181 return -EINVAL;
182 }
183
184 nsim_bus_dev = nsim_bus_dev_new(id, port_count, num_queues);
185 if (IS_ERR(nsim_bus_dev))
186 return PTR_ERR(nsim_bus_dev);
187
188 mutex_lock(&nsim_bus_dev_list_lock);
189 /* Prevent to use resource before initialization. */
190 if (!smp_load_acquire(&nsim_bus_enable)) {
191 mutex_unlock(&nsim_bus_dev_list_lock);
> 192 nsim_bus_dev_del(nsim_bus_dev);
193 return -EBUSY;
194 }
195
196 /* Allow using nsim_bus_dev */
197 smp_store_release(&nsim_bus_dev->init, true);
198
199 list_add_tail(&nsim_bus_dev->list, &nsim_bus_dev_list);
200 mutex_unlock(&nsim_bus_dev_list_lock);
201
202 return count;
203 }
204 static BUS_ATTR_WO(new_device);
205
> 206 static void nsim_bus_dev_del(struct nsim_bus_dev *nsim_bus_dev);
207
--
0-DAY CI Kernel Test Service
https://github.com/intel/lkp-tests/wiki
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-10 5:19 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-09 9:28 [PATCH] netdevsim: Fix task hung by releasing bus lock before device ops Jiakai Xu
2026-05-09 9:33 ` Jiakai Xu
2026-05-10 3:03 ` kernel test robot
2026-05-10 5:18 ` kernel test robot [this message]
2026-05-10 5:41 ` kernel test robot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202605101358.RCmpCsFR-lkp@intel.com \
--to=lkp@intel.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=llvm@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=xujiakai24@mails.ucas.ac.cn \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.