From: Kaitao cheng <kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
To: ast@kernel.org, corbet@lwn.net, martin.lau@linux.dev,
daniel@iogearbox.net, andrii@kernel.org, eddyz87@gmail.com,
song@kernel.org, yonghong.song@linux.dev,
john.fastabend@gmail.com, kpsingh@kernel.org, sdf@fomichev.me,
haoluo@google.com, jolsa@kernel.org, shuah@kernel.org,
chengkaitao@kylinos.cn, skhan@linuxfoundation.org,
memxor@gmail.com
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, vmalik@redhat.com,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 5/8] bpf: Add bpf_list_add to insert node after a given list node
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 13:59:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512055919.95716-6-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512055919.95716-1-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev>
From: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
Add a new kfunc bpf_list_add(head, new, prev, meta, off) that
inserts 'new' after 'prev' in the BPF linked list. Both must be in
the same list; 'prev' must already be in the list. The new node must
be an owning reference (e.g. from bpf_obj_new); the kfunc consumes
that reference and the node becomes non-owning once inserted.
We have added an additional parameter bpf_list_head *head to
bpf_list_add, as the verifier requires the head parameter to
check whether the lock is being held.
Returns 0 on success, -EINVAL if 'prev' is not in a list or 'new'
is already in a list (or duplicate insertion). On failure, the
kernel drops the passed-in node.
Signed-off-by: Kaitao Cheng <chengkaitao@kylinos.cn>
---
kernel/bpf/helpers.c | 11 +++++++++++
kernel/bpf/verifier.c | 12 +++++++++---
2 files changed, 20 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
index 5388078f3171..2b8e8d4284a5 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/helpers.c
@@ -2570,6 +2570,16 @@ __bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_push_back_impl(struct bpf_list_head *head,
return bpf_list_push_back(head, node, meta__ign, off);
}
+__bpf_kfunc int bpf_list_add(struct bpf_list_head *head, struct bpf_list_node *new,
+ struct bpf_list_node *prev, struct btf_struct_meta *meta,
+ u64 off)
+{
+ struct bpf_list_node_kern *n = (void *)new, *p = (void *)prev;
+ struct list_head *prev_ptr = &p->list_head;
+
+ return __bpf_list_add(n, head, &prev_ptr, meta ? meta->record : NULL, off);
+}
+
static struct bpf_list_node *__bpf_list_del(struct bpf_list_head *head,
struct list_head *n)
{
@@ -4748,6 +4758,7 @@ BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_front, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_front_impl)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_push_back_impl)
+BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_add, KF_IMPLICIT_ARGS)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_front, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_pop_back, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
BTF_ID_FLAGS(func, bpf_list_del, KF_ACQUIRE | KF_RET_NULL)
diff --git a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
index 3c0e0076bd69..50f8732aa065 100644
--- a/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
+++ b/kernel/bpf/verifier.c
@@ -10742,6 +10742,7 @@ enum special_kfunc_type {
KF_bpf_list_push_front,
KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl,
KF_bpf_list_push_back,
+ KF_bpf_list_add,
KF_bpf_list_pop_front,
KF_bpf_list_pop_back,
KF_bpf_list_del,
@@ -10811,6 +10812,7 @@ BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_front_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_front)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_back_impl)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_push_back)
+BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_add)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_front)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_pop_back)
BTF_ID(func, bpf_list_del)
@@ -10923,7 +10925,8 @@ static bool is_bpf_list_push_kfunc(u32 func_id)
return func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front] ||
func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_front_impl] ||
func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back] ||
- func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl];
+ func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_push_back_impl] ||
+ func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add];
}
static bool is_bpf_rbtree_add_kfunc(u32 func_id)
@@ -19228,8 +19231,11 @@ int bpf_fixup_kfunc_call(struct bpf_verifier_env *env, struct bpf_insn *insn,
int struct_meta_reg = BPF_REG_3;
int node_offset_reg = BPF_REG_4;
- /* rbtree_add has extra 'less' arg, so args-to-fixup are in diff regs */
- if (is_bpf_rbtree_add_kfunc(desc->func_id)) {
+ /* list_add/rbtree_add have an extra arg (prev/less),
+ * so args-to-fixup are in diff regs.
+ */
+ if (desc->func_id == special_kfunc_list[KF_bpf_list_add] ||
+ is_bpf_rbtree_add_kfunc(desc->func_id)) {
struct_meta_reg = BPF_REG_4;
node_offset_reg = BPF_REG_5;
}
--
2.50.1 (Apple Git-155)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 6:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 5:59 [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 0/8] bpf: Extend the bpf_list family of APIs Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 1/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_del to take list node pointer Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 8:55 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-13 22:30 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 2/8] bpf: clear list node owner and unlink before drop Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 22:53 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-14 1:50 ` Alexei Starovoitov
2026-05-15 4:34 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-15 18:24 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-13 6:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 3/8] bpf: Introduce the bpf_list_del kfunc Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 9:36 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-13 22:32 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 4/8] bpf: refactor __bpf_list_add to take insertion point via **prev_ptr Kaitao cheng
2026-05-13 22:33 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` Kaitao cheng [this message]
2026-05-12 6:41 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 5/8] bpf: Add bpf_list_add to insert node after a given list node bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-12 12:05 ` Kaitao Cheng
2026-05-13 20:44 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 22:35 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 6/8] bpf: add bpf_list_is_first/last/empty kfuncs Kaitao cheng
2026-05-13 22:35 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 7/8] bpf: allow non-owning list-node args via __nonown_allowed Kaitao cheng
2026-05-12 6:41 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 22:22 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 22:37 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-13 22:55 ` Eduard Zingerman
2026-05-12 5:59 ` [PATCH RESEND bpf-next v10 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add test cases for bpf_list_del/add/is_first/is_last/empty Kaitao cheng
2026-05-13 22:44 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260512055919.95716-6-kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--to=kaitao.cheng@linux.dev \
--cc=andrii@kernel.org \
--cc=ast@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=chengkaitao@kylinos.cn \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=daniel@iogearbox.net \
--cc=eddyz87@gmail.com \
--cc=haoluo@google.com \
--cc=john.fastabend@gmail.com \
--cc=jolsa@kernel.org \
--cc=kpsingh@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.lau@linux.dev \
--cc=memxor@gmail.com \
--cc=sdf@fomichev.me \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=song@kernel.org \
--cc=vmalik@redhat.com \
--cc=yonghong.song@linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.