From: Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Muralidhara M K <muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
Cc: ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com, rafael@kernel.org,
platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, driver-core@lists.linux.dev,
Nayak K Prateek <kprateek.nayak@amd.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/7] sysfs: Add SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE flag for binary attributes larger than PAGE_SIZE
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 14:01:45 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026051214-getaway-mammary-debb@gregkh> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260427155129.545327-5-muralidhara.mk@amd.com>
On Mon, Apr 27, 2026 at 09:21:26PM +0530, Muralidhara M K wrote:
> Historically, sysfs read buffers were allocated with get_zeroed_page(),
> limiting reads to PAGE_SIZE. Commit 13c589d5b0ac ("sysfs: use seq_file
> when reading regular files") transitioned regular (text) attribute reads
> to seq_file, which can dynamically grow buffers beyond PAGE_SIZE.
> However, the PAGE_SIZE limit was intentionally preserved for
> compatibility. When binary attribute handling was later unified into
> the same codebase, the non-seq_file read path (kernfs_file_read_iter)
> retained this PAGE_SIZE cap for binary files as well.
>
> Drivers that expose binary attributes larger than PAGE_SIZE — such as
> the AMD HSMP metric table (~13 KB) — cannot deliver the full content
> in a single read() call through the existing path.
That's fine, userspace must be able to handle a "short" read, and will
just continue on and read everything afterward, right? You can't rely
on userspace always asking for more data.
> Introduce a new opt-in flag SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE (040000) that drivers
> can OR into their bin_attribute mode. When set, sysfs selects a new
> kernfs_ops (sysfs_bin_kfops_huge_file_ro) whose .seq_show callback
> pipes the bin_attribute ->read() result through seq_file, allowing
> reads of arbitrary size in one shot. Existing binary attributes
> without the flag continue using the legacy capped path.
If this is such a big issue, why not just do it always for binary files?
What is the benefit of keeping two different code paths just for this
"new" flag?
thanks,
greg k-h
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-12 12:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-27 15:51 [PATCH v2 0/7] AMD HSMP: metrics table improvements and Family 1Ah Model 50h-5Fh support Muralidhara M K
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add new HSMP messages for Family 1Ah, Model 50h-5Fh Muralidhara M K
2026-05-11 17:35 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12 6:21 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add metrics table support for Family 1Ah " Muralidhara M K
2026-05-08 5:12 ` Suma Hegde
2026-05-11 17:38 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12 6:24 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Unify response_sz validation to an upper-bound check Muralidhara M K
2026-05-08 5:13 ` Suma Hegde
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] sysfs: Add SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE flag for binary attributes larger than PAGE_SIZE Muralidhara M K
2026-04-28 7:20 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 6:28 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-05-12 11:44 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-13 3:59 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-12 12:01 ` Greg KH [this message]
2026-05-13 4:13 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13 6:24 ` Greg KH
2026-05-13 6:36 ` K Prateek Nayak
2026-05-13 7:18 ` Greg KH
2026-05-14 14:13 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Add dynamic table size for metric table Muralidhara M K
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Make metric table read locking use guard(mutex) Muralidhara M K
2026-05-11 17:27 ` Ilpo Järvinen
2026-05-12 6:26 ` M K, Muralidhara
2026-04-27 15:51 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] platform/x86/amd/hsmp: Support SYSFS_HUGE_BIN_FILE for metric table reads Muralidhara M K
2026-05-11 11:20 ` [PATCH v2 0/7] AMD HSMP: metrics table improvements and Family 1Ah Model 50h-5Fh support M K, Muralidhara
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026051214-getaway-mammary-debb@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=driver-core@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=ilpo.jarvinen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=kprateek.nayak@amd.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=muralidhara.mk@amd.com \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.