All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
To: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@redhat.com>
Cc: aalbersh@kernel.org, linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] platform_defs.h: fix __counted_by_ptr annotation
Date: Tue, 12 May 2026 09:09:43 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260512160943.GA9555@frogsfrogsfrogs> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <qnp7uxdaslz5u2pb5rvvb577opgw5xrcqbeplob4ukgakbcggp@htp7i6k432xx>

On Tue, May 12, 2026 at 01:48:25PM +0200, Andrey Albershteyn wrote:
> On 2026-05-07 15:11:27, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
> > From: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@kernel.org>
> > 
> > The kernel userspace headers for Linux 7.0 provide the __counted_by_ptr
> > macro, so we shouldn't define it separately on those platforms:
> > 
> >   In file included from radix-tree.c:11:
> >   ../include/platform_defs.h:334:9: error: "__counted_by_ptr" redefined [-Werror]
> >     334 | #define __counted_by_ptr(member)
> >         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> >   In file included from /usr/include/linux/posix_types.h:5,
> >                    from /usr/include/linux/types.h:9,
> >                    from /usr/include/linux/sched/types.h:5,
> >                    from /usr/include/x86_64-linux-gnu/bits/sched.h:63,
> >                    from /usr/include/sched.h:43,
> >                    from /usr/include/pthread.h:22,
> >                    from ../include/platform_defs.h:19:
> >   /usr/include/linux/stddef.h:73:9: note: this is the location of the previous definition
> >      73 | #define __counted_by_ptr(m)
> >         |         ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > 
> > Do the customary ifndef wrapper thing.
> > 
> > Cc: <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org> # v7.0.0
> > Fixes: df91bc3bdc9b81 ("xfs: annotate struct xfs_attr_list_context with __counted_by_ptr")
> > Signed-off-by: "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@kernel.org>
> 
> ops, I haven't tried with new headers

To be fair, I hadn't either -- I hadn't tried with the kernel 7.0 uapi
headers until after you'd pushed the release.  Oops.

> do you have -Werror enabled by default?

Yep.

> Looks good to me
> Reviewed-by: Andrey Albershteyn <aalbersh@kernel.org>

Thanks!

--D

> -- 
> - Andrey
> 
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-12 16:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-07 22:11 [PATCHSET 1/2] xfsprogs: various bug fixes for 7.1 Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-07 22:11 ` [PATCH 1/3] platform_defs.h: fix __counted_by_ptr annotation Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-08  8:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-12 11:59     ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-05-12 11:48   ` Andrey Albershteyn
2026-05-12 16:09     ` Darrick J. Wong [this message]
2026-05-07 22:11 ` [PATCH 2/3] xfs_scrub_all: remove dead code Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-08  8:56   ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-05-07 22:11 ` [PATCH 3/3] xfs_scrub: " Darrick J. Wong
2026-05-08  8:56   ` Christoph Hellwig

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260512160943.GA9555@frogsfrogsfrogs \
    --to=djwong@kernel.org \
    --cc=aalbersh@kernel.org \
    --cc=aalbersh@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.