From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from picard.linux.it (picard.linux.it [213.254.12.146]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6A87DCD4F24 for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 10:34:31 +0000 (UTC) Received: from picard.linux.it (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTP id D51D73E1C39 for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 12:34:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (in-6.smtp.seeweb.it [IPv6:2001:4b78:1:20::6]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (secp384r1)) (No client certificate requested) by picard.linux.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8322A3CD82A for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 12:34:11 +0200 (CEST) Received: from smtp-out1.suse.de (smtp-out1.suse.de [IPv6:2a07:de40:b251:101:10:150:64:1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by in-6.smtp.seeweb.it (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF1721400108 for ; Wed, 13 May 2026 12:34:09 +0200 (CEST) Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (unknown [10.150.64.97]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by smtp-out1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 219F46AE49; Wed, 13 May 2026 10:34:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1778668443; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Tv95+pLIAR00KSsSP4y29NiZlefLC9lVoPulKLULGo=; b=YP9m0ekYJc7/riP8YRyRJ25obFU3HW8BXWOK9UggnNOjdP5eb1Lae4c324aj4bF6g9UyvR NPT7n0aE13yfF2Iebd8MgXKqndkjPQf5ypGka0YI9Js+nHcg3YuLu3pCk45QEMlD/YUhyl z8a6YWM53rrv46S2MEicmbmfJSFmTo8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1778668443; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Tv95+pLIAR00KSsSP4y29NiZlefLC9lVoPulKLULGo=; b=XcqFrVQ8KN4oj5xn99MYBteu1+ZGcdKbz6fSG1Vb8TPBO8Makh2q9PoKsdZnkA//qowavs bV4Lz/N98arse9AQ== Authentication-Results: smtp-out1.suse.de; none DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_rsa; t=1778668443; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Tv95+pLIAR00KSsSP4y29NiZlefLC9lVoPulKLULGo=; b=YP9m0ekYJc7/riP8YRyRJ25obFU3HW8BXWOK9UggnNOjdP5eb1Lae4c324aj4bF6g9UyvR NPT7n0aE13yfF2Iebd8MgXKqndkjPQf5ypGka0YI9Js+nHcg3YuLu3pCk45QEMlD/YUhyl z8a6YWM53rrv46S2MEicmbmfJSFmTo8= DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=suse.cz; s=susede2_ed25519; t=1778668443; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:date:date:message-id:message-id:to:to: cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=0Tv95+pLIAR00KSsSP4y29NiZlefLC9lVoPulKLULGo=; b=XcqFrVQ8KN4oj5xn99MYBteu1+ZGcdKbz6fSG1Vb8TPBO8Makh2q9PoKsdZnkA//qowavs bV4Lz/N98arse9AQ== Received: from imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DD1AC593A9; Wed, 13 May 2026 10:34:02 +0000 (UTC) Received: from dovecot-director2.suse.de ([2a07:de40:b281:106:10:150:64:167]) by imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org with ESMTPSA id S2NaNJpTBGreLAAAD6G6ig (envelope-from ); Wed, 13 May 2026 10:34:02 +0000 Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 12:33:57 +0200 From: Petr Vorel To: Wei Gao Message-ID: <20260513103357.GA318856@pevik> References: <20260331111857.10995-1-wegao@suse.com> <20260507025345.6722-1-wegao@suse.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260507025345.6722-1-wegao@suse.com> X-Spamd-Result: default: False [-3.50 / 50.00]; BAYES_HAM(-3.00)[100.00%]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-1.00)[-1.000]; MID_RHS_NOT_FQDN(0.50)[]; HAS_REPLYTO(0.30)[pvorel@suse.cz]; NEURAL_HAM_SHORT(-0.20)[-1.000]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DKIM_SIGNED(0.00)[suse.cz:s=susede2_rsa,suse.cz:s=susede2_ed25519]; DBL_BLOCKED_OPENRESOLVER(0.00)[imap1.dmz-prg2.suse.org:helo]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; FUZZY_RATELIMITED(0.00)[rspamd.com]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_TLS_ALL(0.00)[]; RCVD_VIA_SMTP_AUTH(0.00)[]; FROM_HAS_DN(0.00)[]; MISSING_XM_UA(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[]; RCPT_COUNT_FIVE(0.00)[5]; RCVD_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; REPLYTO_EQ_FROM(0.00)[] X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 1.0.9 at in-6.smtp.seeweb.it X-Virus-Status: Clean Subject: Re: [LTP] [PATCH v8] fanotify22.c: handle multiple asynchronous error events X-BeenThere: ltp@lists.linux.it X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: Linux Test Project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Reply-To: Petr Vorel Cc: Jan Kara , kernel test robot , ltp@lists.linux.it Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Errors-To: ltp-bounces+ltp=archiver.kernel.org@lists.linux.it Sender: "ltp" Hi all, ... > if (memcmp(&fid->fsid, &ex->fid->fsid, sizeof(fid->fsid))) { > - tst_res(TFAIL, "%s: Received bad FSID type (%x...!=%x...)", > - ex->name, FSID_VAL_MEMBER(fid->fsid, 0), > + tst_res(TFAIL, "Received bad FSID type (%x...!=%x...)", > + FSID_VAL_MEMBER(fid->fsid, 0), > ex->fid->fsid.val[0]); I dared to factor out this unrelated change to a separated commit and merge the patchset. Removing ex->name which is ~ 50% of changes is completely unrelated. When Andrea suggested it [1] it was for a new additions. Although this this change is not a complicated, fanotify tests are quite complex, that's why it's better to separate non-related change. Thanks Jan for helping with the review. Kind regards, Petr [1] https://lore.kernel.org/ltp/69c648d0.050a0220.2ca52b.c494@mx.google.com/ -- Mailing list info: https://lists.linux.it/listinfo/ltp