From: "Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
To: "Mickaël Salaün" <mic@digikod.net>,
"Christian Brauner" <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul Moore" <paul@paul-moore.com>,
"Amir Goldstein" <amir73il@gmail.com>,
"Miklos Szeredi" <miklos@szeredi.hu>,
"Serge Hallyn" <serge@hallyn.com>,
"Stephen Smalley" <stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com>,
"Günther Noack" <gnoack@google.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 3/3] selftests/landlock: Test OverlayFS renames w/o LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 18:05:52 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513160552.4022649-4-gnoack@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260513160552.4022649-1-gnoack@google.com>
Even though OverlayFS uses vfs_rename() with RENAME_WHITEOUT, and even
though RENAME_WHITEOUT requires LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT, a process
that renames files in an OverlayFS can do so without having the
LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT right in that location.
This works, and is supposed to work, because OverlayFS uses the credentials
determined at mount time for the internal vfs_rename() operation. -- The
rename happens with the credentials of the user who mounted the OverlayFS.
Signed-off-by: Günther Noack <gnoack@google.com>
---
tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c | 31 ++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 31 insertions(+)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
index bdad92195f62..0c29887278d0 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/landlock/fs_test.c
@@ -6963,6 +6963,37 @@ TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, same_content_different_file)
}
}
+TEST_F_FORK(layout2_overlay, rename_in_overlay_without_make_whiteout)
+{
+ struct stat st;
+ const char *merge_fl1_renamed = MERGE_DATA "/fl1_renamed";
+
+ if (self->skip_test)
+ SKIP(return, "overlayfs is not supported (test)");
+
+ enforce_fs(_metadata, LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT, NULL);
+
+ /*
+ * Execute a regular file rename within OverlayFS.
+ * merge_fl1 originates from lower layer, so this triggers a copy-up
+ * and creation of a whiteout in the upper layer.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, rename(merge_fl1, merge_fl1_renamed));
+
+ /* Check that the rename worked. */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(merge_fl1_renamed, &st));
+ EXPECT_EQ(-1, stat(merge_fl1, &st));
+ EXPECT_EQ(ENOENT, errno);
+
+ /*
+ * Check that the whiteout object on the underlying "upper" filesystem
+ * exists after the rename. This is OK because it was done with the
+ * credentials of the OverlayFS.
+ */
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, stat(UPPER_DATA "/fl1", &st));
+ EXPECT_TRUE(S_ISCHR(st.st_mode));
+ EXPECT_EQ(0, st.st_rdev);
+}
FIXTURE(layout3_fs)
{
--
2.54.0.563.g4f69b47b94-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-13 16:05 [PATCH v2 0/3] landlock: Restrict renameat2 with RENAME_WHITEOUT Günther Noack
2026-05-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] landlock: Require LANDLOCK_ACCESS_FS_MAKE_WHITEOUT for RENAME_WHITEOUT Günther Noack
2026-05-13 16:05 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] selftests/landlock: Add test for RENAME_WHITEOUT denial Günther Noack
2026-05-13 16:05 ` Günther Noack [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513160552.4022649-4-gnoack@google.com \
--to=gnoack@google.com \
--cc=amir73il@gmail.com \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mic@digikod.net \
--cc=miklos@szeredi.hu \
--cc=paul@paul-moore.com \
--cc=serge@hallyn.com \
--cc=stephen.smalley.work@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.