From: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: sashiko@lists.linux.dev, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 7/8] PCI: of: Set fwnode device of newly created PCI device nodes
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 16:56:02 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513165602.7d6f0f29@bootlin.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512224622.973D1C2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org>
Hi All,
On Tue, 12 May 2026 22:46:21 +0000
sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] The patch fails to achieve its stated goal because `of_changeset_apply()` unconditionally sets the `FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE` flag, causing `fw_devlink` to ignore the explicitly set fwnode device.
> - [High] Dangling `fwnode->dev` pointer leads to a Use-After-Free when the PCI device is removed.
> --
>
> commit 3981405050778ad9837921511772531243255e6a
> Author: Herve Codina <herve.codina@bootlin.com>
>
> PCI: of: Set fwnode device of newly created PCI device nodes
>
> This commit sets the fwnode device field of dynamically created PCI device
> nodes to the corresponding PCI device. This aims to allow fw_devlink to
> properly use the PCI device as a supplier, instead of falling back to the
> PCI root bridge.
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/pci/of.c b/drivers/pci/of.c
> > index 7506208815a47..25fb02c3dc720 100644
> > --- a/drivers/pci/of.c
> > +++ b/drivers/pci/of.c
> > @@ -709,6 +709,13 @@ void of_pci_make_dev_node(struct pci_dev *pdev)
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_free_node;
> >
> > + /*
> > + * Set the fwnode device in order to have fw_devlink creating links
> > + * pointing to this PCI device instead of walking up to the PCI host
> > + * bridge.
> > + */
> > + fw_devlink_set_device(&np->fwnode, &pdev->dev);
>
> Can this lead to a use-after-free regression when the PCI device is removed?
>
> During PCI device removal, of_pci_remove_node() calls
> device_remove_of_node(&pdev->dev) which explicitly sets pdev->dev.fwnode
> to NULL.
>
> Later, when device_del(&pdev->dev) is executed, its built-in fwnode cleanup
> mechanism is completely bypassed because pdev->dev.fwnode was already cleared:
>
> if (dev->fwnode && dev->fwnode->dev == dev)
> fw_devlink_set_device(dev->fwnode, NULL);
>
> This leaves np->fwnode.dev as a dangling pointer to &pdev->dev.
>
> If the OF node outlives the PCI device, any subsequent operation that accesses
> the node through fw_devlink will dereference the freed pdev->dev memory.
It will not. In device_remove_of_node(), the OF node is destroyed when the
of_changeset_revert() and of_changeset_destroy() are called.
>
> > +
> > ret = of_changeset_apply(cset);
>
> Does this code actually prevent fw_devlink from walking up to the PCI host
> bridge?
>
> of_changeset_apply() invokes __of_attach_node(), which unconditionally
> executes fwnode_set_flag(&np->fwnode, FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE).
>
> When fw_devlink attempts to resolve a supplier, it checks for this flag:
>
> if (fwnode_test_flag(sup_handle, FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE))
> sup_dev = fwnode_get_next_parent_dev(sup_handle);
>
> Because FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE is set, fw_devlink bypasses the explicitly
> mapped np->fwnode.dev and walks up the tree to the parent device anyway.
>
> > if (ret)
> > goto out_free_node;
>
Well, an other series fixes this FWNODE_FLAG_NOT_DEVICE issue [1].
In this one, with or without the fw_devlink_set_device() call the issue is
present.
[1] patches 1 and 2 in https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260511155755.34428-1-herve.codina@bootlin.com/
Best regards,
Hervé
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 14:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-11 15:59 [PATCH v7 0/8] lan966x pci device: Add support for SFPs, PCI part Herve Codina
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 1/8] driver core: fw_devlink: Introduce fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 2/8] drivers: core: Use fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 3/8] pinctrl: cs42l43: " Herve Codina
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 4/8] cxl/test: Use device_set_node() Herve Codina
2026-05-12 8:26 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 5/8] cxl/test: Use fw_devlink_set_device() Herve Codina
2026-05-12 8:27 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 6/8] PCI: of: " Herve Codina
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 7/8] PCI: of: Set fwnode device of newly created PCI device nodes Herve Codina
2026-05-12 22:46 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 14:56 ` Herve Codina [this message]
2026-05-11 15:59 ` [PATCH v7 8/8] PCI: of: Remove fwnode_dev_initialized() call for a PCI root bridge node Herve Codina
2026-05-12 23:35 ` sashiko-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513165602.7d6f0f29@bootlin.com \
--to=herve.codina@bootlin.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.