All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Andy Shevchenko" <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, olteanv@gmail.com,
	linux-phy@lists.infradead.org, neil.armstrong@linaro.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 4/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Don't check for specific errors when parsing properties
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 21:38:53 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513213854.71F54C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512130552.272476-5-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [Critical] The driver unconditionally fails or crashes due to incorrect checking of `drvdata`.
--

commit 64758b3de7d3ae700ae3ccdaef989d7410af4921
Author: Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>

phy: phy-can-transceiver: Don't check for specific errors when parsing properties

This commit modifies the max-bitrate property parsing to check for the
property existence first before attempting to read it. It applies a default
value if the property is missing, rather than relying on specific error
codes.

> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> index 23655956ace80..973cc7ce651fb 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-can-transceiver.c
> @@ -128,8 +128,9 @@ static int can_transceiver_phy_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>  	struct gpio_desc *standby_gpio;
>  	struct gpio_desc *enable_gpio;
>  	struct mux_state *mux_state;
> -	u32 max_bitrate = 0;
>  	int err, i, num_ch = 1;
> +	const char *propname;
> +	u32 max_bitrate;
>  
>  	drvdata = device_get_match_data(dev);
>  	if (drvdata)

I noticed a potential issue in the context of this diff. Is the check for
drvdata inverted here? This logic appears to have been introduced by a
previous patch in the series.

If device_get_match_data() successfully finds match data, the probe function
aborts and returns -ENODEV. If no match data is found, drvdata is NULL and
the function proceeds, which leads to a dereference on the next check:

	drvdata = device_get_match_data(dev);
	if (drvdata)
		return -ENODEV;

	if (drvdata->flags & CAN_TRANSCEIVER_DUAL_CH)
		num_ch = 2;

Could this cause the driver to fail on valid probes, or dereference a NULL
pointer when match data is missing?

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512130552.272476-1-andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com?part=4

-- 
linux-phy mailing list
linux-phy@lists.infradead.org
https://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/linux-phy

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 21:38 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-12 13:01 [PATCH v4 0/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Ad-hoc cleanups and refactoring Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01 ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 1/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Check driver match and driver data against NULL Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 2/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: use device_get_match_data() Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-13 21:26   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 21:51     ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 3/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Move OF ID table closer to their user Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-13 21:31   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 4/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Don't check for specific errors when parsing properties Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-13 21:38   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-12 13:01 ` [PATCH v4 5/5] phy: phy-can-transceiver: Drop unused include Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-12 13:01   ` Andy Shevchenko
2026-05-13 21:44   ` sashiko-bot

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260513213854.71F54C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=linux-phy@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=neil.armstrong@linaro.org \
    --cc=olteanv@gmail.com \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.