All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Rob Herring <robh@kernel.org>
To: sashiko@lists.linux.dev
Cc: Matthew Leung <matthew.leung@oss.qualcomm.com>,
	linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the Hawi PCIe Controller
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 17:53:10 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513225310.GA2251300-robh@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260508012135.76B34C2BCB2@smtp.kernel.org>

On Fri, May 08, 2026 at 01:21:34AM +0000, sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [Low] The compatible string and filename violate the established Qualcomm PCIe naming pattern.
> --
> 
> commit 332996956780b2d8736ee1fcd6b38c1627f71689
> Author: Matthew Leung <matthew.leung@oss.qualcomm.com>
> 
> dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the Hawi PCIe Controller
> 
> Add a dedicated schema for the PCIe controllers found on the Hawi
> platform.
> 
> > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,hawi-pcie.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,hawi-pcie.yaml
> > new file mode 100644
> > index 0000000000000..154bc88e59694
> > --- /dev/null
> > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/pci/qcom,hawi-pcie.yaml
> 
> This isn't a bug, but is there a reason this file isn't named
> qcom,pcie-hawi.yaml? The rest of the Qualcomm PCIe Root Complex bindings
> strictly follow the qcom,pcie-<soc> naming pattern, such as
> qcom,pcie-sc7280.yaml and qcom,pcie-sm8550.yaml.

Sashiko is wrong here.

> 
> [ ... ]
> 
> > +properties:
> > +  compatible:
> > +    const: qcom,hawi-pcie
> 
> Should this compatible string also be changed to qcom,pcie-hawi to maintain
> consistency with the other Qualcomm Root Complex definitions across the
> subsystem?
> 
> -- 
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260508-hawi-pcie-v1-0-0c910906f7e5@oss.qualcomm.com?part=1

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-13 22:53 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-08  1:02 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: qcom: Add PCIe support for upcoming Hawi SoC Matthew Leung
2026-05-08  1:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the Hawi PCIe Controller Matthew Leung
2026-05-08  1:21   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-13 22:53     ` Rob Herring [this message]
2026-05-19 13:41     ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: qcom: Add PCIe support for upcoming Hawi SoC Manivannan Sadhasivam
2026-05-13 22:56   ` [PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: PCI: qcom: Document the Hawi PCIe Controller Rob Herring
2026-05-14  1:01     ` Matthew Leung
2026-05-08  1:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: qcom: Add support for Hawi Matthew Leung
2026-05-08  1:29   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 17:21 ` [PATCH 0/2] PCI: qcom: Add PCIe support for upcoming Hawi SoC Bjorn Helgaas
2026-05-14 19:32   ` Matthew Leung
2026-05-19 13:07     ` Manivannan Sadhasivam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260513225310.GA2251300-robh@kernel.org \
    --to=robh@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=matthew.leung@oss.qualcomm.com \
    --cc=sashiko@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.