From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@kernel.org>
Cc: dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com, linux-input@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Input: atlas - Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 22:58:19 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260513225820.00890C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8696590.T7Z3S40VBb@rafael.j.wysocki>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Incomplete Fix for driver_override Abuse (Global State Corruption)
--
commit ef51cbfbb2dd379fb06abd9c22db66e86bb70eb3
Author: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Input: atlas - Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL
This commit adds a check to ensure the ACPI companion device is present in
the atlas_btns driver to prevent issues when a device is forced to match
via device_match_driver_override().
> diff --git a/drivers/input/misc/atlas_btns.c b/drivers/input/misc/atlas_btns.c
> index 47b31725e8507..835ad45a9d65c 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/misc/atlas_btns.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/misc/atlas_btns.c
> @@ -60,11 +60,15 @@ static acpi_status acpi_atlas_button_handler(u32 function,
>
> static int atlas_acpi_button_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> {
> - struct acpi_device *device = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
> + struct acpi_device *device;
> acpi_status status;
> int i;
> int err;
>
> + device = ACPI_COMPANION(&pdev->dev);
> + if (!device)
> + return -ENODEV;
> +
> input_dev = input_allocate_device();
The commit message mentions this check is to protect against
device_match_driver_override() forcing a match with unexpected devices.
If driver_override is used to force-bind this driver to multiple platform
devices that do have ACPI companions, could this cause issues with the global
input_dev variable?
Since input_dev is overwritten on each successful probe, it looks like earlier
allocated input devices would be leaked if multiple bindings succeed.
Additionally, if these devices are later unbound, or if a subsequent probe
fails after modifying input_dev, could this lead to a double-free or null
pointer dereference when the shared input_dev pointer is cleaned up?
Would it make sense to either reject multiple bindings or store the input
device in the platform device's private data using platform_set_drvdata()?
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/8696590.T7Z3S40VBb@rafael.j.wysocki?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-13 22:58 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 16:26 [PATCH v1] Input: atlas - Check ACPI_COMPANION() against NULL Rafael J. Wysocki
2026-05-12 17:57 ` Dmitry Torokhov
2026-05-13 22:58 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260513225820.00890C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael@kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.