From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Leon Hwang" <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v14 6/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
Date: Thu, 14 May 2026 00:46:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514004634.3DA09C19425@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260512153157.28382-7-leon.hwang@linux.dev>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Race condition causing unrelated file descriptor closure and resource leakage due to failure after fd_install().
--
commit 37e50113e50fb4d6482363699239289046be6ff2
Author: Leon Hwang <leon.hwang@linux.dev>
bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create
This commit adds common syscall log attributes to map_create(). It creates
a verifier log to report map-creation failure reasons back to userspace,
improving debuggability.
> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> index 2fa05ba8f1619..6600e126fbfb4 100644
> --- a/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/syscall.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -1611,6 +1632,31 @@ static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr)
> return err;
> }
>
> +static int map_create(union bpf_attr *attr, bpfptr_t uattr, struct bpf_common_attr *attr_common,
> + bpfptr_t uattr_common, u32 size_common)
> +{
> + struct bpf_verifier_log *log;
> + struct bpf_log_attr attr_log;
> + int err, ret;
> +
> + log = bpf_log_attr_create_vlog(&attr_log, attr_common, uattr_common, size_common);
> + if (IS_ERR(log))
> + return PTR_ERR(log);
> +
> + err = __map_create(attr, uattr, log);
> +
> + /* preserve original error even if log finalization is successful */
> + ret = bpf_log_attr_finalize(&attr_log, log);
> + if (ret) {
> + if (err >= 0)
> + close_fd(err);
Since __map_create() has already successfully created the map and installed
the file descriptor via fd_install(), the fd is globally visible to the
process at this point.
If bpf_log_attr_finalize() fails (for example, due to an invalid pointer
for log_true_size), we attempt to roll back by calling close_fd(err) and
returning an error.
Could this race with a concurrent thread?
If another thread closes this fd and opens a new file between fd_install()
and this close_fd() call, wouldn't we erroneously close an unrelated file?
Also, if another thread dups the fd before we close it, wouldn't the BPF
map remain alive and accessible to userspace even though the map_create
syscall returned a failure?
> + err = ret;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(log);
> + return err;
> +}
[ ... ]
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260512153157.28382-1-leon.hwang@linux.dev?part=6
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 0:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 21+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 15:31 [PATCH bpf-next v14 0/8] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 1/8] " Leon Hwang
2026-05-13 22:48 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:24 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 2/8] libbpf: Add support for extended BPF syscall Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 16:23 ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-13 2:10 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 3/8] bpf: Refactor reporting log_true_size for prog_load Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 4/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support " Leon Hwang
2026-05-13 23:56 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 5/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for btf_load Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 6/8] bpf: Add syscall common attributes support for map_create Leon Hwang
2026-05-14 0:46 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-14 14:25 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 7/8] libbpf: " Leon Hwang
2026-05-14 1:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:25 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 15:31 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 8/8] selftests/bpf: Add tests to verify map create failure log Leon Hwang
2026-05-14 1:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 14:26 ` Leon Hwang
2026-05-12 19:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v14 0/8] bpf: Extend BPF syscall with common attributes support patchwork-bot+netdevbpf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514004634.3DA09C19425@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=leon.hwang@linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.