From: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
To: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
Cc: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>, damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH 6.18.y] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
Date: Wed, 13 May 2026 22:35:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260514053517.112149-1-sj@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260514020242.5CD8FC19425@smtp.kernel.org>
On Thu, 14 May 2026 02:02:41 +0000 sashiko-bot@kernel.org wrote:
> Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
> - [High] Writing to the `enabled` sysfs parameter triggers a NULL pointer dereference if the module's initialization failed.
> - [Low] The commit introduces a call to an undefined function `damon_kdamond_pid()`, causing a build failure.
> --
>
> commit 45d783d4b3fd23532d7c6b975b70fda3e5324f1b
> Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
> mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values
>
> This commit modifies the DAMON reclaim module to dynamically detect and use
> the fresh running status of kdamond when parameters are requested. This
> prevents stale cached statuses from being shown to users when kdamond stops
> unexpectedly.
>
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260419161003.79176-1-sj@kernel.org
> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260419161003.79176-2-sj@kernel.org
>
> > diff --git a/mm/damon/reclaim.c b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > index 7ba3d0f9a19ac..9446e7a1b476f 100644
> > --- a/mm/damon/reclaim.c
> > +++ b/mm/damon/reclaim.c
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > @@ -334,42 +320,83 @@ module_param_cb(addr_unit, &addr_unit_param_ops, &addr_unit, 0600);
> > MODULE_PARM_DESC(addr_unit,
> > "Scale factor for DAMON_RECLAIM to ops address conversion (default: 1)");
> >
> > +static bool damon_reclaim_enabled(void)
> > +{
> > + if (!ctx)
> > + return false;
> > + return damon_is_running(ctx);
> > +}
> > +
> > static int damon_reclaim_enabled_store(const char *val,
> > const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > {
> > - bool is_enabled = enabled;
> > - bool enable;
> > int err;
> >
> > - err = kstrtobool(val, &enable);
> > + err = kstrtobool(val, &enabled);
> > if (err)
> > return err;
> >
> > - if (is_enabled == enable)
> > + if (damon_reclaim_enabled() == enabled)
> > return 0;
> >
> > /* Called before init function. The function will handle this. */
> > if (!damon_initialized())
> > - goto set_param_out;
> > + return 0;
> >
> > - err = damon_reclaim_turn(enable);
> > - if (err)
> > - return err;
> > + return damon_reclaim_turn(enabled);
> > +}
>
> If module initialization fails during boot, for example due to an allocation
> failure in damon_modules_new_paddr_ctx_target(), the global ctx pointer will
> remain NULL. Because damon_reclaim is built-in, its sysfs parameters are
> still exposed.
>
> If a user subsequently writes to the enabled parameter,
> damon_reclaim_enabled_store() will see that damon_initialized() is true
> because the global cache is initialized, and it will call
> damon_reclaim_turn().
>
> This unconditionally passes the NULL ctx pointer to either damon_stop() or
> damon_reclaim_apply_parameters(), which eventually calls damon_commit_ctx().
>
> Could this cause a NULL pointer dereference when accessing the uninitialized
> ctx pointer?
Sashiko reported [1] same thing before, and I'm working on it.
>
> [ ... ]
>
> > +static int damon_reclaim_kdamond_pid_load(char *buffer,
> > + const struct kernel_param *kp)
> > +{
> > + int kdamond_pid = -1;
> > +
> > + if (ctx) {
> > + kdamond_pid = damon_kdamond_pid(ctx);
>
> Is the function damon_kdamond_pid() defined anywhere in the tree?
>
> It appears this function is called here but might be missing, which would
> cause an implicit declaration and linker error. Could a prerequisite patch be
> missing from this cherry-pick?
I informed this issue and where the dependent patch can be found, on the
commentary area of the patch.
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260419014800.877-1-sj@kernel.org/
Thanks,
SJ
>
> > + if (kdamond_pid < 0)
> > + kdamond_pid = -1;
> > + }
> > + return sprintf(buffer, "%d\n", kdamond_pid);
> > +}
>
> --
> Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260513043902.183499-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-14 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-12 14:05 FAILED: patch "[PATCH] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and" failed to apply to 6.18-stable tree gregkh
2026-05-13 4:39 ` [PATCH 6.18.y] mm/damon/reclaim: detect and use fresh enabled and kdamond_pid values SeongJae Park
2026-05-14 2:02 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-14 5:35 ` SeongJae Park [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260514053517.112149-1-sj@kernel.org \
--to=sj@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.