From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail3-164.sinamail.sina.com.cn (mail3-164.sinamail.sina.com.cn [202.108.3.164]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5ABF521018A for ; Fri, 15 May 2026 02:39:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.108.3.164 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778812765; cv=none; b=NXLluKqG1H9HtTmgrVh7tWmoJY2kP+CKQZGFbNyAEngAGkz4oUaQfyDXt3sH6McNt+hYXCTON5xIDS2k3bDoNMf7iupxXk1GAyfP+2ke+15KipB3l+DGRBfm7QglX1HvMRmHAe5/vKKv1wDtJlCP/LX0UUbkizL+8Lg/4Nr+LUo= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778812765; c=relaxed/simple; bh=7KQuQY+z5lmandK6lDHf1l0pixbGUyiXgGM8OAGz2dE=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=nIWsc0oN3GkrDpA4TgS5d8naPjohjPqI6CFP8XN6wHsrbg+hD3pEDFvcpqrsGgIshDrSfK1c6JZV2OHdmRr0/gw77oNKAAYWgl80mZcwSe9ayddqTg/Aren61mGhPPIURXE57GOsC4ujqIchKxGC6oEytwqo+1YV9bWBdyuwhd0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sina.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sina.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sina.com header.i=@sina.com header.b=jt6aEi37; arc=none smtp.client-ip=202.108.3.164 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=sina.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=sina.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=sina.com header.i=@sina.com header.b="jt6aEi37" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sina.com; s=201208; t=1778812761; bh=juH4/2LtcQFOC3Mvl0hMLSOSKYO8G6JssK+pFuVHxm8=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID; b=jt6aEi37NRCFA5LiZLK97MgFGSJxSpvVJIiECiP3Z4xv2jajBUVyd/0DBzfmHMuK/ xQe3CDc3hLl0Psot7ghDvEuLrTlgH7xV9pofLPIgCEeTEHttbLxA2MWngwVMYhmFc1 slO6Q1hs2G7vjJOD8IkzoFniRHyuBuf8LjjN6IRg= X-SMAIL-HELO: localhost.localdomain Received: from unknown (HELO localhost.localdomain)([114.249.62.144]) by sina.com (10.54.253.32) with ESMTP id 6A06873000003E37; Fri, 15 May 2026 10:38:42 +0800 (CST) X-Sender: hdanton@sina.com X-Auth-ID: hdanton@sina.com Authentication-Results: sina.com; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=hdanton@sina.com; dkim=none header.i=none; dmarc=none action=none header.from=hdanton@sina.com X-SMAIL-MID: 4351434456928 X-SMAIL-UIID: 03741D15D2E944F5BB77B88B30414870-20260515-103842-1 From: Hillf Danton To: Tal Zussman Cc: "Matthew Wilcox (Oracle)" , Christoph Hellwig , linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 1/4] block: add task-context bio completion infrastructure Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 10:38:41 +0800 Message-ID: <20260515023845.684-1-hdanton@sina.com> In-Reply-To: <20260514-blk-dontcache-v6-1-782e2fa7477b@columbia.edu> References: <20260514-blk-dontcache-v6-0-782e2fa7477b@columbia.edu> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-block@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit On Thu, 14 May 2026 17:51:14 -0400 Tal Zussman wrote: > + > +static void bio_complete_work_fn(struct work_struct *w) > +{ > + struct delayed_work *dw = to_delayed_work(w); > + struct bio_complete_batch *batch = > + container_of(dw, struct bio_complete_batch, work); > + > + while (1) { > + struct bio_list list; > + struct bio *bio; > + > + local_lock_irq(&bio_complete_batch.lock); > + list = batch->list; > + bio_list_init(&batch->list); > + local_unlock_irq(&bio_complete_batch.lock); > + > + if (bio_list_empty(&list)) > + break; > + > + while ((bio = bio_list_pop(&list))) > + bio->bi_end_io(bio); > + > + if (need_resched()) { > + bool is_empty; > + Checking resched is not needed as workqueue worker can be preempted while processing bios．Given batch and delayed work, I suspect completing more than batch, the bios accumulated within a jiff, makes sense. > + local_lock_irq(&bio_complete_batch.lock); > + is_empty = bio_list_empty(&batch->list); > + local_unlock_irq(&bio_complete_batch.lock); > + if (!is_empty) > + mod_delayed_work_on(batch->cpu, > + bio_complete_wq, > + &batch->work, 0); > + break; > + } > + } > +} > +