From: Tuomas Ahola <taahol@utu.fi>
To: Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com>
Cc: <git@vger.kernel.org>, Jeff King <peff@peff.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/4] approxidate: alias "today" to "now"
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 08:02:43 +0300 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515050243.daahz%taahol@utu.fi> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <xmqqa4u1e9k9.fsf@gitster.g>
Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> writes:
>
> > Tuomas Ahola <taahol@utu.fi> writes:
> >
> >> Junio C Hamano <gitster@pobox.com> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Tuomas Ahola <taahol@utu.fi> writes:
> >>>
> >>> > Sorry, I don't know if I understood. Does the patch change the behavior of
> >>> > that command somehow? Is there some kind of edge case I missed?
> >>>
> >>> No, I did not think it was a good idea to carve the behaviour in
> >>> stone that "git log --since=today" behaves as if it were given "git
> >>> log --since=now". My reaction would have been very different if we
> >>> were deliberatly and explicitly saying "today is synonym for now",
> >>> but the thing is, it is not a designed behaviour but what
> >>> approxidate does for anything it does not understand, e.g.
> >>>
> >>> git log --since=decay
> >>> git log --since=bogus
> >>>
> >>> all behave as if it were given --since=now.
> >>
> >> Thanks for spelling that out. So, as there is no deliberative
> >> decision behind the current behaviour of "today", the code has
> >> to remain non-committed on that; we are not at liberty to codify
> >> the status quo. Right?
> >
> > Not right. It is more like "Even though we try not to change
> > existing behavoiur left and right without a good reason to avoid
> > breaking existing users' expectations, we should be able to "fix"
> > what is not intended behaviour but is something the code happened to
> > be doing, especially if the current behaviour does not make sense.
Well, that's not far off from what I wrote. I just meant we cannot
make the current (somewhat accidental) behaviour official *just because*
it happens to be the status quo.
>
> And the other half of the discussion is that once we explicitly say "today
> means right now" and make it official, it makes it much harder to fix it
> later. So we need to be very careful in our first attempt.
Roger that.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-15 5:02 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-03-18 18:01 [PATCH 0/2] approxidate: tweak special date formats Tuomas Ahola
2025-03-18 18:02 ` [PATCH 1/2] approxidate: make "specials" respect fixed day-of-month Tuomas Ahola
2025-04-04 8:19 ` Jeff King
2025-03-18 18:02 ` [PATCH 2/2] approxidate: overwrite tm_mday for `now` and `yesterday` Tuomas Ahola
2025-04-04 8:40 ` Jeff King
2026-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/3] approxidate: tweak special date formats Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] t0006: add support for approxidate test date adjustment Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-12 16:34 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-12 18:35 ` Jeff King
2026-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] approxidate: make "specials" respect fixed day-of-month Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-12 16:52 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-12 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] approxidate: use deferred mday adjustments for "specials" Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-14 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 0/4] approxidate: tweak special date formats Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-14 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 1/4] t0006: add support for approxidate test date adjustment Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-14 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 2/4] approxidate: alias "today" to "now" Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-14 15:36 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-14 21:07 ` Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-15 1:27 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-15 1:38 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-15 5:02 ` Tuomas Ahola [this message]
2026-05-14 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 3/4] approxidate: make "specials" respect fixed day-of-month Tuomas Ahola
2026-05-14 16:06 ` Junio C Hamano
2026-05-14 11:55 ` [PATCH v3 4/4] approxidate: use deferred mday adjustments for "specials" Tuomas Ahola
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260515050243.daahz%taahol@utu.fi \
--to=taahol@utu.fi \
--cc=git@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=gitster@pobox.com \
--cc=peff@peff.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.