All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
To: jic23@kernel.org
Cc: dlechner@baylibre.com, nuno.sa@analog.com, andy@kernel.org,
	sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com, tglx@kernel.org,
	christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr, mingo@kernel.org, kees@kernel.org,
	nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz, kyungmin.park@samsung.com,
	linux-iio@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH v8 09/12] iio: ssp_sensors: use guard() to release mutexes
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 23:10:14 +0530	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260515174017.3962168-10-sanjayembedded@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260515174017.3962168-1-sanjayembedded@gmail.com>

From: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>

Replace explicit mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() with the guard() macro
for cleaner and safer mutex handling.

Signed-off-by: Sanjay Chitroda <sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com>
---
 drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c | 47 ++++++++++--------------
 1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 27 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
index ebcda6de56c4..29bc3d48c42f 100644
--- a/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
+++ b/drivers/iio/common/ssp_sensors/ssp_spi.c
@@ -4,6 +4,7 @@
  */
 
 #include "ssp.h"
+#include <linux/cleanup.h>
 
 #define SSP_DEV (&data->spi->dev)
 #define SSP_GET_MESSAGE_TYPE(data) ((data) & (3 << SSP_RW))
@@ -180,9 +181,8 @@ static inline void ssp_pending_add(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 	if (no_irq)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
 	list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
-	mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
 }
 
 static inline void ssp_pending_del(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
@@ -191,9 +191,8 @@ static inline void ssp_pending_del(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 	if (no_irq)
 		return;
 
-	mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
 	list_del(&msg->list);
-	mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
 }
 
 static int __ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
@@ -204,17 +203,20 @@ static int __ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 	/* msg->done must be initialized by caller */
 	WARN_ON(!msg->done);
 
-	mutex_lock(&data->comm_lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&data->comm_lock);
 
 	status = ssp_check_lines(data, false);
-	if (status < 0)
-		goto _error_locked;
+	if (status < 0) {
+		data->timeout_cnt++;
+		return status;
+	}
 
 	status = spi_write(data->spi, msg->buffer, SSP_HEADER_SIZE);
 	if (status < 0) {
 		gpiod_set_value_cansleep(data->ap_mcu_gpiod, 1);
 		dev_err(SSP_DEV, "%s spi_write fail\n", __func__);
-		goto _error_locked;
+		data->timeout_cnt++;
+		return status;
 	}
 
 	ssp_pending_add(data, msg, no_irq);
@@ -222,16 +224,11 @@ static int __ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
 	status = ssp_check_lines(data, true);
 	if (status < 0) {
 		ssp_pending_del(data, msg, no_irq);
-		goto _error_locked;
+		data->timeout_cnt++;
+		return status;
 	}
 
-	mutex_unlock(&data->comm_lock);
 	return 0;
-
-_error_locked:
-	mutex_unlock(&data->comm_lock);
-	data->timeout_cnt++;
-	return status;
 }
 
 static int ssp_do_transfer(struct ssp_data *data, struct ssp_msg *msg,
@@ -379,12 +376,12 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
 
 	switch (msg_type) {
 	case SSP_AP2HUB_READ:
-	case SSP_AP2HUB_WRITE:
+	case SSP_AP2HUB_WRITE: {
 		/*
 		 * this is a small list, a few elements - the packets can be
 		 * received with no order
 		 */
-		mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+		guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
 		list_for_each_entry_safe(iter, n, &data->pending_list, list) {
 			if (iter->options == msg_options) {
 				list_del(&iter->list);
@@ -400,10 +397,8 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
 			 * check but let's handle this
 			 */
 			buffer = kmalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
-			if (!buffer) {
-				ret = -ENOMEM;
-				goto _unlock;
-			}
+			if (!buffer)
+				return -ENOMEM;
 
 			/* got dead packet so it is always an error */
 			ret = spi_read(data->spi, buffer, length);
@@ -415,7 +410,7 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
 			dev_err(SSP_DEV, "No match error %x\n",
 				msg_options);
 
-			goto _unlock;
+			break;
 		}
 
 		if (msg_type == SSP_AP2HUB_READ)
@@ -433,16 +428,15 @@ int ssp_irq_msg(struct ssp_data *data)
 				msg->length = 1;
 
 				list_add_tail(&msg->list, &data->pending_list);
-				goto _unlock;
+				break;
 			}
 		}
 
 		if (msg->done)
 			if (!completion_done(msg->done))
 				complete(msg->done);
-_unlock:
-		mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
 		break;
+	}
 	case SSP_HUB2AP_WRITE:
 		buffer = kzalloc(length, GFP_KERNEL | GFP_DMA);
 		if (!buffer)
@@ -472,7 +466,7 @@ void ssp_clean_pending_list(struct ssp_data *data)
 {
 	struct ssp_msg *msg, *n;
 
-	mutex_lock(&data->pending_lock);
+	guard(mutex)(&data->pending_lock);
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(msg, n, &data->pending_list, list) {
 		list_del(&msg->list);
 
@@ -480,7 +474,6 @@ void ssp_clean_pending_list(struct ssp_data *data)
 			if (!completion_done(msg->done))
 				complete(msg->done);
 	}
-	mutex_unlock(&data->pending_lock);
 }
 
 int ssp_command(struct ssp_data *data, char command, int arg)
-- 
2.34.1


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-15 17:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 13+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15 17:40 [PATCH v8 00/12] iio: ssp_sensors: driver fixes, refactor and cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 01/12] iio: ssp_sensors: cancel delayed work_refresh on remove Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 02/12] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out pending list add/remove helpers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 03/12] iio: ssp_sensors: refactor transfer logic into helper Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 04/12] iio: ssp_sensors: factor out MCU enable/disable helpers Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 05/12] iio: ssp_sensors: use local struct device Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 06/12] iio: ssp_sensors: fix variable type and declaration order in probe() Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 07/12] iio: ssp_sensors: Drop duplicated wdt timer and work cleanup Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 08/12] iio: ssp_sensors: convert probe and teardown to devm-managed resources Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` Sanjay Chitroda [this message]
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 10/12] iio: ssp_sensors: Use dev_err_probe() Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 11/12] iio: ssp_sensors: return errors directly from ssp_irq_msg() Sanjay Chitroda
2026-05-15 17:40 ` [PATCH v8 12/12] iio: ssp_sensors: reuse embedded RX buffer for SPI transfers Sanjay Chitroda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260515174017.3962168-10-sanjayembedded@gmail.com \
    --to=sanjayembeddedse@gmail.com \
    --cc=andy@kernel.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=dlechner@baylibre.com \
    --cc=jic23@kernel.org \
    --cc=kees@kernel.org \
    --cc=kyungmin.park@samsung.com \
    --cc=linux-iio@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@kernel.org \
    --cc=nabijaczleweli@nabijaczleweli.xyz \
    --cc=nuno.sa@analog.com \
    --cc=tglx@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.