All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>
To: gregkh@linuxfoundation.org
Cc: Frank.Li@nxp.com, s.hauer@pengutronix.de, kernel@pengutronix.de,
	festevam@gmail.com, shawnguo@kernel.org, hcazarim@yahoo.com,
	imx@lists.linux.dev, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Stepan Ionichev <sozdayvek@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] firmware: imx: scu-irq: accumulate wakeup sources via sysfs_emit_at()
Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 14:07:26 +0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260516090726.38362-1-sozdayvek@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2026051633-doorstep-sequence-6782@gregkh>

On Sat, May 16, 2026 at 09:15:54AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> This is a horrible sysfs file, and breaks all the rules.  Why not just
> delete it and use the proper api for it instead?

Yeah, fair. The sprintf change just papers over the real issue, which
is the interface itself.

Quick check: no Documentation/ABI/ entry, github code search returns
nothing outside the kernel tree itself
(https://github.com/search?q=scu_wakeup_irqs&type=code), and
codesearch.debian.net also shows zero hits. So removing the attribute
looks doable.

Frank, Sascha -- any out-of-tree readers of
/sys/firmware/scu_wakeup_irqs/wakeup_src I should worry about?  If
not, I'll send v2 that drops the attribute and logs the wakeup source
via dev_info() instead.

Stepan

  reply	other threads:[~2026-05-16  9:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-15 17:50 [PATCH] firmware: imx: scu-irq: accumulate wakeup sources via sysfs_emit_at() Stepan Ionichev
2026-05-16  7:15 ` Greg KH
2026-05-16  9:07   ` Stepan Ionichev [this message]
2026-05-16  9:20     ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260516090726.38362-1-sozdayvek@gmail.com \
    --to=sozdayvek@gmail.com \
    --cc=Frank.Li@nxp.com \
    --cc=festevam@gmail.com \
    --cc=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=hcazarim@yahoo.com \
    --cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=kernel@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
    --cc=shawnguo@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.