From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail-wm1-f48.google.com (mail-wm1-f48.google.com [209.85.128.48]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A1FB91FF1B4 for ; Sat, 16 May 2026 08:42:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778920968; cv=none; b=r9NFdDPMDxyUvYEaRbnQfkfKP3fQ+6TmwaDumCJjs4Um+GCtxvuejtDb1218kB1PQnqQk3sV9Ug6OEX7G6xqHkFeSwUtw1HuuEOqFNx2Ra0fzfjCmYNmhj/mwMFE/3D12YXMttbdmWEzJDSqS+NeKZORaMVR44VkqMlkn8eEXwI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1778920968; c=relaxed/simple; bh=RnkaXF+insktooUT2CslgYeWpdkUta1D3SaeHR6Tok0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=fSf94jkcNNJ3EwZ8s9BH/+FxyWM4gFwnqCZU3zrWpdDNkBBnUvBn/t6dva2qlYIfE+T0kozHRccxkU4lnH0FstB8JXtRnQ6v+vVwjNpvmlf1VsN8pJVh2OOxXsa3RToTt5/vwVrOaDVh58LThJir/K3Hi+FxLCoeNyecc7B9Ejs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b=kxbpRZTC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=209.85.128.48 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=gmail.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="kxbpRZTC" Received: by mail-wm1-f48.google.com with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-488a88aeec9so6514315e9.2 for ; Sat, 16 May 2026 01:42:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20251104; t=1778920965; x=1779525765; darn=vger.kernel.org; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:from:to:cc:subject:date :message-id:reply-to; bh=GjaZvzmqJsfgwXiIBwGP+VbrW7tGLwzGVyPjpadwRZ4=; b=kxbpRZTCw8OfZCVwJ8ZSZ0aP0PzpgRZl5RNGr9GKPjaBWx7jd8fns0oLSn/eBogsqN I+Ifg9tAgC2zedQX5ifJbMyk2PDf8EPvt6Vmg9g0iWtsCnyHZ3/0nvo2adIxftyCnZGl /xlPWDIqowJgL2gpDzMN0Cro11Qs/V051uFP9Ocp8k4Ngy0LCI6JMQbRQ9F+IfLYc+TK Da8Nw+YwpoDqyzTr+9jQ7vowUPKbPhuL3FMAQGROsmOuo10Y7fF0AzFK5w+wEMBJAFXv 4pB70/eW/v5giggt5hygWiEjOFZBOPUmybMmQ8hi2t35ueghUXgvGU5SjH6e4rHI9lLb KkGw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20251104; t=1778920965; x=1779525765; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:references:in-reply-to :message-id:subject:cc:to:from:date:x-gm-gg:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc:subject:date:message-id:reply-to; bh=GjaZvzmqJsfgwXiIBwGP+VbrW7tGLwzGVyPjpadwRZ4=; b=c+pczAMpyZ603UrQxzZ5E7mAy/CczLIrs9lI1ZMYVxjTniO7OKJiY6cBiUPZRMLxJv 2iKwN5iNyeFu7NNUVEMiuL/6xD3WZdj/TpiUp53qG+2vYtxVUAI8+JS6o+uU6sGENtjg VwuYhhk8ePBEAaiVKdvsgAcqaa3QNwj6lahaifQ886tNX+WxS1aqhe7n3K8PXjKSWe+A k+ITkn9M254TbBmuBuaWqQHzVwbXOg8NeDrcqPS0EYXPHFhO+pJPgq9K84yItzKa0IH1 joaioOB9bG7/QUw7d8nPbIpWtn44XufAMd3xsrgwsmdXkxFIO8lPrcGxouQe9ueVNAx8 FuDA== X-Forwarded-Encrypted: i=1; AFNElJ9jIDMlULhMneLufJWJLFypgmnXdeFo4do5FH3xwRNDOWdkbllF0DoJIGXVd2BV/uMwg6DAEkV2rAIWRHoO@vger.kernel.org X-Gm-Message-State: AOJu0YwgbhGBcrnyYkmxiD6SxeBTfb+qPAzYLYykeg31U+kqi+ql9rSF 7X8Fg4hAS3wk2st9/VkVAa6nYwtM7pCEpU9VSYYgrEAFnL+yfv3HvPz7 X-Gm-Gg: Acq92OHn502rgluAMQ+k03uUk7FDXVgT1wGqPEtnQkIzDs5Y6+8WKBapR3EaqPbS0GE bKI8xW4s3o72sELmoa7BmCWPOuxgDe60rp5qcjglui6RP+PmNZbUkCGg5le189k7YLW+Ay1yRhc SfpFjPAMSMRPqRXyv8n/sBoD9WOvWKoc7245XwkfeipxCOxIsXWM+zWHlk7LrDDVmvbhDPxDkMY 2ElcNmzN95UCJqyVojKK9VaF2Gv+p19XKcAxFfzXCr1YI++OoA2dzVBZzyFp4GkYIxNNy8ua2sE WDczUwDYMWXwa5aMpSPh4D87/tzVUER0uU/h2eUfYfDTz3m/Hl98nx32NJzfFHNb1FXcs56fdJy gSzsKvcuv+i5CrtonzhBOTJ5m+n7HVK2UPsG7+3NvAO7AR14sXhLlk/Oaww4Lnh3qtcGhnSGyUW XjkHf2nkpF4F/yEUdaowYjqm+x5MUH+NCLfhj2C1UquOSolXNfQqdJJxnYZHjr X-Received: by 2002:a05:600c:8b4b:b0:48f:d2fc:d025 with SMTP id 5b1f17b1804b1-48fe60e14d0mr91173965e9.6.1778920964812; Sat, 16 May 2026 01:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Received: from pumpkin (82-69-66-36.dsl.in-addr.zen.co.uk. [82.69.66.36]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 5b1f17b1804b1-48fe537c788sm108760745e9.12.2026.05.16.01.42.44 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Sat, 16 May 2026 01:42:44 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 16 May 2026 09:42:42 +0100 From: David Laight To: Amir Goldstein Cc: Miklos Szeredi , Christian Brauner , Jan Kara , Al Viro , Linus Torvalds , Nirmoy Das , linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org, linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] err_ptr.h: introduce ERR_PTR_SAFE() Message-ID: <20260516094242.77d20c92@pumpkin> In-Reply-To: References: <20260514200129.94862-1-amir73il@gmail.com> <20260515193010.056ef472@pumpkin> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.1.1 (GTK 3.24.38; arm-unknown-linux-gnueabihf) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-unionfs@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, 15 May 2026 21:26:04 +0200 Amir Goldstein wrote: > On Fri, May 15, 2026 at 8:30=E2=80=AFPM David Laight > wrote: > > > > On Thu, 14 May 2026 22:01:29 +0200 > > Amir Goldstein wrote: > > =20 ... > > > > The object code bloat would be noticeable if this were used everywhere. > > But you could make it a bit simpler: > > if (__builtin_constant_p(__e)) > > BUILD_BUG_ON(__e && !IS_ERR_VALUE(__e)); > > else if WARN_ON(__e && !IS_ERR_VALUE(__e)) > > __e =3D -MAX_ERRNO; // Or maybe -EINVAL to stop and oth= er boundary errors > > (void *)__e; =20 >=20 > Yeh that's nicer thanks. Actually this might be better still (or just more succinct): void *__e =3D (void *)error; BUILD_BUG_ON(!statically_true(IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__e)); if (WARN_ON(!IS_ERR_OR_NULL(__e)) __e =3D (void *)-EINVAL; __e; The WARN_ON() will be optimised away (valid) constants. > > The check for constants may be fairly pointless. > > One of the static checkers may already detect the obvious fubar ERR_PTR= (EINVAL). =20 >=20 > True, but I figured it didn't add much overhead if we are placing > the runtime assertions anyway? The 'size' check in READ_ONCE() measurably slows down the kernel compilatio= n. But there are a lot of those. I think I know the main reason - the extern for the 'error message function= '. -- David >=20 > Thanks, > Amir.