From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "SeongJae Park" <sj@kernel.org>
Cc: damon@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2.1] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: delete tried region in regions_rmdirs()
Date: Sun, 17 May 2026 18:27:49 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260517182750.8F52FC2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260517175915.3352-1-sj@kernel.org>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] Moving the `sz_filter_passed` assignment to after `kobject_init_and_add()` exposes uninitialized kernel heap memory to user space.
- [High] Relying solely on `kobject_put()` to remove directories from sysfs leaves directories visible if references are held.
--
commit eda0f7269f695739057cee7bd02d81742d566163
Author: SeongJae Park <sj@kernel.org>
mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: delete tried region in regions_rmdirs()
This commit updates DAMON sysfs to remove region objects from the linked list
immediately before decrementing the kobject reference count to prevent
use-after-free races. It also modifies region population to only add the
region to the list after a successful kobject initialization.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260513011920.119183-1-sj@kernel.org
> diff --git a/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c b/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> --- a/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> +++ b/mm/damon/sysfs-schemes.c
> @@ -163,7 +163,7 @@ static void damon_sysfs_scheme_regions_rm_dirs(
> struct damon_sysfs_scheme_region *r, *next;
>
> list_for_each_entry_safe(r, next, ®ions->regions_list, list) {
> - /* release function deletes it from the list */
> + list_del(&r->list);
> kobject_put(&r->kobj);
This is not a new regression, but does relying solely on kobject_put() to
remove directories from sysfs leave them visible if references are still
held?
If an elevated reference count exists, such as a process having an open file
descriptor to a sysfs attribute, the kobject is not immediately released and
kobject_del() is delayed.
Could this leave the old region directory accessible in sysfs indefinitely,
causing stale directories to accumulate alongside new ones? Should
kobject_del(&r->kobj) be called explicitly before kobject_put() to cleanly
and synchronously remove the directory?
> regions->nr_regions--;
> }
[ ... ]
> @@ -2925,15 +2925,16 @@ void damos_sysfs_populate_region_dir(struct damon_sysfs_schemes *sysfs_schemes,
> region = damon_sysfs_scheme_region_alloc(r);
> if (!region)
> return;
> - region->sz_filter_passed = sz_filter_passed;
> - list_add_tail(®ion->list, &sysfs_regions->regions_list);
> - sysfs_regions->nr_regions++;
> if (kobject_init_and_add(®ion->kobj,
> &damon_sysfs_scheme_region_ktype,
> &sysfs_regions->kobj, "%d",
> sysfs_regions->nr_regions++)) {
> kobject_put(®ion->kobj);
> + return;
> }
> + region->sz_filter_passed = sz_filter_passed;
Could moving the sz_filter_passed assignment after kobject_init_and_add()
expose uninitialized memory to user space?
If the region object is allocated without zeroing the memory, calling
kobject_init_and_add() makes the region's kobject immediately visible in
sysfs.
If a concurrent read to the sz_filter_passed sysfs attribute occurs during
this window, could it read the field without locking and leak uninitialized
kernel heap memory to user space? Should the assignment occur before the
kobject is registered?
> + list_add_tail(®ion->list, &sysfs_regions->regions_list);
> + sysfs_regions->nr_regions++;
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260517175915.3352-1-sj@kernel.org?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-17 18:27 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-17 17:59 [RFC PATCH v2.1] mm/damon/sysfs-schemes: delete tried region in regions_rmdirs() SeongJae Park
2026-05-17 18:27 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-17 20:58 ` SeongJae Park
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260517182750.8F52FC2BCB8@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=damon@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=sj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.