All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: mm-commits@vger.kernel.org,hch@lst.de,akpm@linux-foundation.org
Subject: + raid6-warn-when-using-less-than-four-devices.patch added to mm-nonmm-unstable branch
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 14:13:46 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518211347.03051C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)


The patch titled
     Subject: raid6: warn when using less than four devices
has been added to the -mm mm-nonmm-unstable branch.  Its filename is
     raid6-warn-when-using-less-than-four-devices.patch

This patch will shortly appear at
     https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/25-new.git/tree/patches/raid6-warn-when-using-less-than-four-devices.patch

This patch will later appear in the mm-nonmm-unstable branch at
    git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm

Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
   a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
   b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
   c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
      reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's

*** Remember to use Documentation/process/submit-checklist.rst when testing your code ***

The -mm tree is included into linux-next via various
branches at git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/akpm/mm
and is updated there most days

------------------------------------------------------
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Subject: raid6: warn when using less than four devices
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 07:17:51 +0200

Quoting H.  Peter Anvin who came up with the RAID6 P/Q algorithm, and who
wrote the initial implementation, then still part of the md driver:

  The RAID-6 code has *never* supported only 3 units, and if it ever
  worked for *any* of the implementations it was purely by accident.
  Speaking as the original author I should know; this was deliberate as
  in some cases the degenerate case (3) would have required extra trays
  in the code to no user benefit.

While md never allowed less than 4 devices, btrfs does.  This new warning
will trigger for such file systems, but given how it already causes havoc
that is a good thing.  If btrfs wants to fix third, it should switch to
transparently use three-way mirroring underneath, which will work as P and
Q are copies of the single data device by the definition of the Linux RAID
6 P/Q algorithm.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/20260518051804.462141-9-hch@lst.de
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org>
Tested-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@kernel.org> # kunit only on arm64
Cc: Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>
Cc: Alexander Gordeev <agordeev@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Alexandre Ghiti <alex@ghiti.fr>
Cc: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@arndb.de>
Cc: "Borislav Petkov (AMD)" <bp@alien8.de>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com>
Cc: Chris Mason <clm@fb.com>
Cc: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Cc: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
Cc: Heiko Carstens <hca@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Herbert Xu <herbert@gondor.apana.org.au>
Cc: "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>
Cc: Huacai Chen <chenhuacai@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>
Cc: Li Nan <linan122@huawei.com>
Cc: Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>
Cc: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>
Cc: Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@dabbelt.com>
Cc: Song Liu <song@kernel.org>
Cc: Sven Schnelle <svens@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: Vasily Gorbik <gor@linux.ibm.com>
Cc: WANG Xuerui <kernel@xen0n.name>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@kernel.org>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
---

 include/linux/raid/pq.h |    2 ++
 lib/raid/raid6/algos.c  |    2 ++
 2 files changed, 4 insertions(+)

--- a/include/linux/raid/pq.h~raid6-warn-when-using-less-than-four-devices
+++ a/include/linux/raid/pq.h
@@ -11,6 +11,8 @@
 #include <linux/blkdev.h>
 #include <linux/mm.h>
 
+#define RAID6_MIN_DISKS		4
+
 void raid6_gen_syndrome(int disks, size_t bytes, void **ptrs);
 void raid6_xor_syndrome(int disks, int start, int stop, size_t bytes,
 		void **ptrs);
--- a/lib/raid/raid6/algos.c~raid6-warn-when-using-less-than-four-devices
+++ a/lib/raid/raid6/algos.c
@@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ void raid6_gen_syndrome(int disks, size_
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task() || irqs_disabled() || softirq_count());
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes & 511);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(disks < RAID6_MIN_DISKS);
 
 	raid6_call.gen_syndrome(disks, bytes, ptrs);
 }
@@ -77,6 +78,7 @@ void raid6_xor_syndrome(int disks, int s
 {
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(!in_task() || irqs_disabled() || softirq_count());
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(bytes & 511);
+	WARN_ON_ONCE(disks < RAID6_MIN_DISKS);
 	WARN_ON_ONCE(stop < start);
 
 	raid6_call.xor_syndrome(disks, start, stop, bytes, ptrs);
_

Patches currently in -mm which might be from hch@lst.de are

raid6-turn-the-userspace-test-harness-into-a-kunit-test.patch
raid6-remove-__kernel__-ifdefs.patch
raid6-move-to-lib-raid.patch
raid6-remove-unused-defines-in-pqh.patch
raid6-remove-raid6_get_zero_page.patch
raid6-use-named-initializers-for-struct-raid6_calls.patch
raid6-improve-the-public-interface.patch
raid6-warn-when-using-less-than-four-devices.patch
raid6-hide-internals.patch
raid6-rework-registration-of-optimized-algorithms.patch
raid6-use-static_call-for-gen_syndrom-and-xor_syndrom.patch
raid6-use-static_call-for-raid6_recov_2data-and-raid6_recov_datap.patch
raid6-update-top-of-file-comments.patch
raid6_kunit-use-kunit_case_param.patch
raid6_kunit-dynamically-allocate-data-buffers-using-vmalloc.patch
raid6_kunit-cleanup-dataptr-handling.patch
raid6_kunit-randomize-parameters-and-increase-limits.patch
raid6_kunit-randomize-buffer-alignment.patch


                 reply	other threads:[~2026-05-18 21:13 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260518211347.03051C2BCB7@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=mm-commits@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.