From: Andre Przywara <andre.przywara@arm.com>
To: Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com>
Cc: Paul Kocialkowski <paulk@sys-base.io>,
linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev, devicetree@vger.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: allwinner: A133: add support for Baijie Helper A133 board
Date: Mon, 18 May 2026 23:54:32 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260518235432.07537260@ryzen.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <04da68168f92b196cce4d49c766fc62702bf6472.camel@gmail.com>
On Mon, 18 May 2026 22:05:25 +0200
Alexander Sverdlin <alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com> wrote:
Hi Paul, Alexander,
> thanks for the review!
>
> On Mon, 2026-05-18 at 13:52 +0200, Paul Kocialkowski wrote:
> >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-baije-core.dtsi b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-baije-core.dtsi
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..65b094f30bf5
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-baije-core.dtsi
>
> []
>
> > You should add:
> >
> > chosen {
> > stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> > };
>
> I actually have it in .dts, but it's theoretically possible to deploy
> the core board in a way that serial0 is *not* a console, so the above
> probably will not be valid in all cases in .dtsi.
I am with Alexander here, to me the serial port belong into the
helper board .dts, not the SoM .dtsi.
>
> >
> >
> >
> > > +®_dcdc2 {
> > > + regulator-always-on;
> > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <500000>;
> > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> >
> > Should be:
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <900000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
>
> 0.81..1.2v according to A133 Datasheet Revision 1.1 Jul.14, 2020?
Do you have the CPU OPPs for this board? Do they slightly
overclock/over-volt the core? We have seen this for some other boards.
But you could go with the safer 810mV...1200mV range, and we adjust
this when needed.
>
> >
> > > +®_dcdc4 {
> > > + regulator-always-on;
> > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <500000>;
> > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1300000>;
> > > + regulator-name = "vdd-sys";
> >
> > Should be:
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <810000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <990000>;
> > regulator-name = "vcc-usb-sys";
>
> I'm a bit puzzled here: datasheet says 0.9..1.0v
> and it has no "Typ" value, similar to VDD_CPU, but
> VDD_SYS is not part of OPP tables, so who is going
> to adjust this? Or shall it be just
>
> regulator-min-microvolt = <950000>;
> regulator-max-microvolt = <950000>;
There is indeed no exact value to be found. Just go with whatever the
BSP used: either it's the PMIC reset value, or it's adjusted by boot0.
If you have a BSP kernel booted, check the value of this regulator on
the Linux prompt, then use this value. Chances are it's indeed 950mV,
as used by the Liontron board.
>
> ?
>
> >
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +®_dcdc5 {
> > > + regulator-always-on;
> > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <800000>;
> > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <1840000>;
> > > + regulator-name = "vcc-dram";
> >
> > Should be:
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <1100000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1100000>;
> > regulator-name = "vcc-dram-2";
> >
> > ALDO2 is the main DRAM supply, this is the second one.
>
> Core schematics mentions 1.1V/1.2/1.35/1.5 on this rail...
> Currently U-Boot has CONFIG_AXP_DCDC5_VOLT=1100, but potentially
> this is adjustable, right? At some point LPDDR4 chips they
> are soldering today will be unavailable. And in the current
> market it will happen rather sooner than later...
We don't support multiple DRAM types for one board, really. If they
switch to another DRAM type, we will need a new DT or some other way to
adjust this (potentially runtime patched by U-Boot). But we can address
this when we get there, so just set the 1.1V that LPDDR4 requires for
the existing boards right now.
>
> >
> > > +};
> > > +
> > > +/* DCDC6 unused */
> > > +
> > > +®_dldo1 {
> > > + regulator-min-microvolt = <700000>;
> > > + regulator-max-microvolt = <3300000>;
> > > + regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <1000>;
> >
> > Should be:
> > regulator-min-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > regulator-max-microvolt = <1800000>;
> > regulator-name = "vcc-pg";
>
> Do suggest to drop vendor's
>
> regulator-enable-ramp-delay = <1000>;
>
> in all cases?
>
I don't see this used in many other mainline DTs, mostly it's just for
some picky peripherals (PHYs). So if that works stable for you without,
I'd drop all of them.
> > >
> > > diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-baijie-helper.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-baijie-helper.dts
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..ccbca5d0a40c
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-a133-baijie-helper.dts
>
> []
>
> > > + aliases {
> > > + serial0 = &uart0;
> >
> > The is best added to the core dtsi.
> >
> > > + };
> > > +
> > > + chosen {
> > > + stdout-path = "serial0:115200n8";
> >
> > Ditto.
>
> But it only physically materializes in Helperboard, the carrier.
> Potentially this one can be left floating or used for something else.
As mentioned above, I agree on this staying in the helper board .dts,
and it not being moved.
Cheers,
Andre
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-18 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-10 20:16 [PATCH v2 0/3] Add support for Baijie Helper A133 board Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 1/3] dt-bindings: vendor-prefixes: Add Shenzhen Baijie Technology Co., Ltd Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 11:36 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 2/3] dt-bindings: arm: sunxi: Add Baijie HelperBoard A133 compatible Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 16:08 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-11 16:18 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 16:34 ` Conor Dooley
2026-05-18 11:35 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-10 20:16 ` [PATCH v2 3/3] arm64: dts: allwinner: A133: add support for Baijie Helper A133 board Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 11:44 ` Andre Przywara
2026-05-17 20:38 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 3:30 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-05-18 10:12 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 11:16 ` Andre Przywara
2026-05-18 11:29 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 11:54 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-18 12:50 ` Andre Przywara
2026-05-18 14:47 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-05-18 14:51 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-11 22:07 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-18 11:52 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-18 12:09 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 14:14 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-18 14:40 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 14:56 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-18 15:04 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 21:23 ` Andre Przywara
2026-05-18 20:05 ` Alexander Sverdlin
2026-05-18 21:46 ` Paul Kocialkowski
2026-05-19 3:33 ` Chen-Yu Tsai
2026-05-18 21:54 ` Andre Przywara [this message]
2026-06-04 22:37 ` Alexander Sverdlin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260518235432.07537260@ryzen.lan \
--to=andre.przywara@arm.com \
--cc=alexander.sverdlin@gmail.com \
--cc=devicetree@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-sunxi@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=paulk@sys-base.io \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.