Re: [PATCH] usb: gadget: uvc: hold opts->lock across XU walks in uvc_function_bind

[Greg KH <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>]

On Thu, Apr 30, 2026 at 06:41:04PM +0300, SnailSploit | Kai Aizen wrote:
> From: "SnailSploit | Kai Aizen" <95986478+SnailSploit@users.noreply.github.com>
> 
> uvc_function_bind() walks &opts->extension_units twice without holding
> opts->lock:
> 
>   - directly, for the iExtension string-descriptor fixup loop;
>   - indirectly, four times via uvc_copy_descriptors() (once per speed),
>     where the helper iterates uvc->desc.extension_units (which aliases
>     &opts->extension_units) to size and emit XU descriptors.
> 
> The configfs side (uvcg_extension_make / uvcg_extension_drop, in
> drivers/usb/gadget/function/uvc_configfs.c) takes opts->lock around its
> list_add_tail / list_del operations.  A privileged userspace process
> that holds the configfs subtree open and writes the gadget UDC name
> to bind the function while concurrently rmdir()'ing an extensions
> subdir can race uvcg_extension_drop() against the bind-time list walks
> and dereference a freed struct uvcg_extension.
> 
> Hold opts->lock from the start of the XU string-descriptor fixup
> through the last uvc_copy_descriptors() call, releasing on the
> descriptor-error path via a new error_unlock label that drops the
> lock before falling through to the existing error label.  This
> matches the locking discipline of the configfs callbacks and removes
> the only remaining unsynchronised reader of the XU list during bind.
> 
> Reachability: only privileged processes that can mount configfs and
> write to gadget UDC files can trigger the race, so this is a
> correctness fix rather than a security boundary.
> 
> Fixes: 0525210c9840 ("usb: gadget: uvc: Allow definition of XUs in configfs")
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Signed-off-by: SnailSploit | Kai Aizen <95986478+SnailSploit@users.noreply.github.com>
> ---
>  drivers/usb/gadget/function/f_uvc.c | 28 +++++++++++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

Did you send this twice?

Still need a real email address.

thanks,

greg k-h