From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com
Cc: vkoul@kernel.org, Frank.Li@kernel.org, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
imx@lists.linux.dev, dmaengine@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 00:31:59 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521003159.A88F11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260520-dma_prep_config-v6-4-06e49b7acb38@nxp.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 1 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The newly added `dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg` callback modifies shared channel state locklessly, violating dmaengine API atomicity guarantees and potentially corrupting active hardware transfers.
--
commit 3f734236aec2497e34a2baf98f60bcd0cd1c6525
Author: Frank Li <Frank.Li@nxp.com>
dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback
This commit replaces the device_prep_slave_sg callback with the new
device_prep_config_sg callback to combine configuration and descriptor
preparation.
> diff --git a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> index c2feb3adc79fa..92572dd8131e6 100644
> --- a/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
> +++ b/drivers/dma/dw-edma/dw-edma-core.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -577,10 +577,11 @@ dw_edma_device_transfer(struct dw_edma_transfer *xfer)
> }
>
> static struct dma_async_tx_descriptor *
> -dw_edma_device_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> - unsigned int len,
> - enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> - unsigned long flags, void *context)
> +dw_edma_device_prep_config_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> + unsigned int len,
> + enum dma_transfer_direction direction,
> + unsigned long flags,
> + struct dma_slave_config *config)
> {
> struct dw_edma_transfer xfer;
>
> @@ -591,6 +592,9 @@ dw_edma_device_prep_slave_sg(struct dma_chan *dchan, struct scatterlist *sgl,
> xfer.flags = flags;
> xfer.type = EDMA_XFER_SCATTER_GATHER;
>
> + if (config && dw_edma_device_config(dchan, config))
> + return NULL;
[Severity: High]
Does this introduce a data race on the shared channel state?
By implementing the device_prep_config_sg callback, the driver bypasses
the dmaengine core's per-channel spinlock, which normally protects
configuration and preparation.
However, dw_edma_device_config() modifies global channel state locklessly:
static int dw_edma_device_config(...)
{
...
chan->non_ll = false;
...
if (cfg_non_ll || non_ll)
chan->non_ll = true;
...
memcpy(&chan->config, config, sizeof(*config));
...
}
If multiple threads queue transfers concurrently, could this corrupt the
descriptor configuration?
More importantly, if a new transfer is prepared while the channel is actively
executing, the interrupt handler might read the momentarily cleared or
overwritten chan->non_ll.
Could this cause the interrupt handler to invoke the wrong hardware routine
and desynchronize the hardware state?
> +
> return dw_edma_device_transfer(&xfer);
> }
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260520-dma_prep_config-v6-0-06e49b7acb38@nxp.com?part=4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-21 0:32 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-20 22:00 [PATCH v6 0/9] dmaengine: Add new API to combine configuration and descriptor preparation Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 1/9] dmaengine: Add API to combine configuration and preparation (sg and single) Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 2/9] dmaengine: Add safe API to combine configuration and preparation Frank.Li
2026-05-21 0:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 14:56 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 3/9] PCI: endpoint: pci-epf-test: Use dmaenigne_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 4/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Use new .device_prep_config_sg() callback Frank.Li
2026-05-21 0:31 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-21 14:59 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 5/9] dmaengine: dw-edma: Pass dma_slave_config to dw_edma_device_transfer() Frank.Li
2026-05-21 0:51 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:02 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 6/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Remove unnecessary dmaengine_terminate_sync() on each DMA transfer Frank.Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 7/9] nvmet: pci-epf: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single_safe() API Frank.Li
2026-05-21 1:39 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:08 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 8/9] PCI: epf-mhi: Use dmaengine_prep_config_single() to simplify code Frank.Li
2026-05-21 2:08 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:09 ` Frank Li
2026-05-20 22:00 ` [PATCH v6 9/9] crypto: atmel: Use dmaengine_prep_config_sg() API Frank.Li
2026-05-21 2:33 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 15:11 ` Frank Li
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260521003159.A88F11F000E9@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@kernel.org \
--cc=Frank.Li@oss.nxp.com \
--cc=dmaengine@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=imx@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.