All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Ihor Solodrai" <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>
Cc: bpf@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/3] bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks
Date: Thu, 21 May 2026 23:41:59 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260521234200.9431E1F00A3B@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260521225022.2695755-3-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
- [High] The lock fallback path unconditionally fails when CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK is not set, silently breaking build ID parsing in sleepable BPF programs.
- [Medium] Incorrect check for file-backed VMAs using `vma->vm_file` instead of `!vma_is_anonymous(vma)`.
--

commit 84d83effb87030cad9aaab2d51c0df334f8c48df
Author: Ihor Solodrai <ihor.solodrai@linux.dev>

bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks

This commit avoids calling sleepable build ID parsing while holding mmap_lock
or a per-VMA read lock to prevent blocking. It introduces a new function to
resolve VMAs and acquire references, dropping the VMA lock before parsing.

Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251218005818.614819-1-shakeel.butt@linux.dev/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260128183232.2854138-1-andrii@kernel.org/
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/2895ecd8-df1e-4cc0-b9f9-aef893dc2360@linux.dev/

> diff --git a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> --- a/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
> +++ b/kernel/bpf/stackmap.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -174,6 +175,107 @@ static inline void stack_map_build_id_set_valid(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id,
[ ... ]
> +static struct vm_area_struct *stack_map_lock_vma(struct stack_map_vma_lock *lock, unsigned long ip)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = lock->mm;
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +
> +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!mm))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	vma = lock_vma_under_rcu(mm, ip);
> +	if (vma)
> +		goto vma_locked;
> +
> +	/*
> +	 * Taking mmap_read_lock() is unsafe here, because the caller
> +	 * BPF program might already hold it, causing a deadlock.
> +	 */
> +	if (!mmap_read_trylock(mm))
> +		return NULL;
> +
> +	vma = vma_lookup(mm, ip);
> +	if (!vma) {
> +		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +
> +#ifdef CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK
> +	if (!vma_start_read_locked(vma)) {
> +		mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +		return NULL;
> +	}
> +	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +#else
> +	mmap_read_unlock(mm);
> +	return NULL;
> +#endif

[Severity: High]
Does this unconditionally break sleepable build ID parsing when
CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK is not enabled?

Because lock_vma_under_rcu() returns NULL without per-VMA locks, the code
falls back to mmap_read_trylock() and vma_lookup(). However, when it reaches
the #else block here, it always unlocks and returns NULL, causing the
sleepable path to fail and degrade to raw IPs.

Prior to this patch, mmap_read_trylock() was used successfully regardless
of CONFIG_PER_VMA_LOCK. Could we retain the mmap_read_lock protected fallback
for kernels without per-VMA locks, or is there another way to keep this
feature working?

> +vma_locked:
> +	lock->vma_locked = true;
> +	lock->vma = vma;
> +	return vma;
> +}
[ ... ]
> +static void stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable(struct bpf_stack_build_id *id_offs,
> +						    u32 trace_nr)
> +{
> +	struct mm_struct *mm = current->mm;
> +	struct stack_map_vma_lock lock = {
> +		.vma_locked = false,
> +		.vma = NULL,
> +		.mm = mm,
> +	};
> +	struct vm_area_struct *vma;
> +	struct file *file;
> +	u64 offset;
> +	u64 ip;
> +
> +	for (u32 i = 0; i < trace_nr; i++) {
> +		ip = READ_ONCE(id_offs[i].ip);
> +
> +		vma = stack_map_lock_vma(&lock, ip);
> +		if (!vma || !vma->vm_file) {

[Severity: Medium]
Is it possible for anonymous VMAs (such as private mappings of /dev/zero) to
bypass this check?

According to the MM guidelines, vma->vm_file can be non-NULL even for
anonymous VMAs, which might lead to taking unnecessary file references and
calling build_id_parse_file() on them.

Should this use !vma_is_anonymous(vma) instead of checking vma->vm_file
directly to ensure we only process properly file-backed VMAs?

> +			stack_map_build_id_set_ip(&id_offs[i]);
> +			stack_map_unlock_vma(&lock);
> +			continue;
> +		}
> +
> +		file = get_file(vma->vm_file);
> +		offset = stack_map_build_id_offset(vma->vm_pgoff, vma->vm_start, ip);
> +		stack_map_unlock_vma(&lock);

-- 
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260521225022.2695755-1-ihor.solodrai@linux.dev?part=2

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-05-21 23:42 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-21 22:50 [PATCH bpf-next v6 0/3] bpf: Implement stack_map_get_build_id_offset_sleepable() Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 1/3] bpf: Factor out stack_map build ID helpers Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-21 23:16   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-21 23:32     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-22 17:17       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-22 17:16   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-22 17:33     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-22 17:50       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 2/3] bpf: Avoid faultable build ID reads under mm locks Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-21 23:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-21 23:41   ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-22 17:42   ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-22 18:04     ` Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-22 18:14       ` Andrii Nakryiko
2026-05-21 22:50 ` [PATCH bpf-next v6 3/3] bpf: Cache build IDs in sleepable stackmap path Ihor Solodrai
2026-05-21 23:33   ` bot+bpf-ci
2026-05-22  0:13   ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-22 17:46   ` Andrii Nakryiko

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260521234200.9431E1F00A3B@smtp.kernel.org \
    --to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
    --cc=bpf@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ihor.solodrai@linux.dev \
    --cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.