From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from szelinsky.de (szelinsky.de [85.214.127.56]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62BCF2F616A; Sat, 23 May 2026 19:29:59 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.127.56 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779564601; cv=none; b=ZpxGuVVs8/+dQyW23GG/mZfOOVVh7YGYEawc4uMs+f8pM6wG2MHAVc0T2hmUOkcFe9WBJIZ2anEqANqPHGBUagJOzqhS6mgdD516dOFjADAz5LaBAJz21LNO+iI8IAOPCdZkFFL8BT+w3rSUbm8MrqmQLtypmLU8bu/P6VE2Imc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1779564601; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fm5N/kRJPaNrBuzSYHadYSqbBDcpc/fogoG/BsvJPm8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version; b=YHUgGCrbc5iRKwsW24kfjUDeVwbtDMwd5+zOMhJPA9Wqav5onquLscugmChvSA2imG7EXvIZWZMMemdXRiKbUWgaZlR6ngkTA5pEkjB/oYJbNxd5/ZTg/Rue7XcWBhdVBR2wOJNEotDeee3GAO++Ziz4b1myVFykEhZt50H+Tsk= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=szelinsky.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=szelinsky.de; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=szelinsky.de header.i=@szelinsky.de header.b=JRivGdFk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=85.214.127.56 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=szelinsky.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=szelinsky.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=temperror (0-bit key) header.d=szelinsky.de header.i=@szelinsky.de header.b="JRivGdFk" Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by szelinsky.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 820CEE831AD; Sat, 23 May 2026 21:20:39 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=szelinsky.de; s=mail; t=1779564039; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Pjmk1oikieDQs11cDLyn6nA1ZMKvPIUFrcEK7xNtQv8=; b=JRivGdFkZe0m7gAoFwqR5BJ7cvqP3B7mMHUNy+uGxksJsAndJSv+AbRz0fumZj2MP32oIV u3+QN9ObrjSKfqKU3CPVhZue9AlblVYkBxEwZH0VvftTXk1SDyeDxQIe1edXjXtE3Y2ljC u2R91IP5mw7O8/mMYKbZ/FnAZVYhm5PNMtfjYyGxO1OGonK10YjAqiNPS3SL9vTZ4grvAu sbutGluYsv/Yjduk0zk6//MO5+MltxhPFWjeRxVXsAkNRc7sX7SV7GQhqx/wilOmpWBCpq cpeaTsgpyWeT7hErImfTeF5flUN6Zw5aAX8Z+kgTPmQNikLt+jYvnRwjy8obFg== X-Virus-Scanned: Debian amavis at szelinsky.de Received: from szelinsky.de ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (szelinsky.de [127.0.0.1]) (amavis, port 10025) with ESMTP id 5DKrsHRRmzz5; Sat, 23 May 2026 21:20:39 +0200 (CEST) Received: from p14sgen5.fritz.box (p578439b8.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [87.132.57.184]) by szelinsky.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA; Sat, 23 May 2026 21:20:38 +0200 (CEST) From: Carlo Szelinsky To: Kory Maincent Cc: Jakub Kicinski , Oleksij Rempel , Andrew Lunn , "David S . Miller" , Eric Dumazet , Paolo Abeni , Krzysztof Kozlowski , netdev@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-leds@vger.kernel.org, Carlo Szelinsky Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next v4 1/2] net: pse-pd: add devm_pse_poll_helper() Date: Sat, 23 May 2026 21:20:27 +0200 Message-ID: <20260523192027.319105-1-github@szelinsky.de> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.43.0 In-Reply-To: <20260414161146.77b70d4d@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> References: <20260414161146.77b70d4d@kmaincent-XPS-13-7390> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-leds@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Hi Kory, Sorry for the late reply. Too many different track and I got lost. Just to close the loop on the notifs_mask OOB: v5 1/2 ("net: pse-pd: add devm_pse_poll_helper()", sent Apr 29) extends your bitmap pattern from 5099807f335c to pse_handle_events() and pse_poll_worker(). Storage moved to notifs_mask pointers backed by devm_bitmap_zalloc, with bitmap_zero / bitmap_empty / for_each_set_bit on real pointers. So the new code in v5 doesn't reintroduce the OOB. Does this make sense? Cheers, Carlo