From: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@kernel.org>,
linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Darren Hart" <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Davidlohr Bueso" <dave@stgolabs.net>,
"André Almeida" <andrealmeid@igalia.com>,
"Carlos Llamas" <cmllamas@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, wakel@google.com
Subject: [PATCH v2 2/2] selftests/futex: Correct validation logic in waitv
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 01:06:35 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526010635.23980-3-wakel@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260526010635.23980-1-wakel@google.com>
In futex_waitv negative tests (invalid_flag, unaligned_address, etc.),
test results were previously evaluated as:
if (res == EINVAL)
Since sys_futex_waitv returns -1 on error and sets errno, direct positive
comparisons against res are always false, causing tests to silently pass
regardless of real errors.
Correct these validations to assert EXPECT_EQ(res, -1) and compare errno
directly against expected constants.
Signed-off-by: Wake Liu <wakel@google.com>
---
.../selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c | 45 +++++++++----------
1 file changed, 20 insertions(+), 25 deletions(-)
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c
index 3053f69cf0c3..6a6fc49708a2 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/futex/functional/futex_waitv.c
@@ -132,11 +132,10 @@ TEST(invalid_flag)
to.tv_sec++;
res = futex_waitv(waitv, NR_FUTEXES, 0, &to, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
- if (res == EINVAL) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(0) TH_LOG("futex_waitv private returned: %d %s",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(res, -1) TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected result: %d", res);
+ if (res == -1)
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL)
+ TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected errno: %d", errno);
}
TEST(unaligned_address)
@@ -156,11 +155,10 @@ TEST(unaligned_address)
to.tv_sec++;
res = futex_waitv(waitv, NR_FUTEXES, 0, &to, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
- if (res == EINVAL) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(0) TH_LOG("futex_wake private returned: %d %s",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(res, -1) TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected result: %d", res);
+ if (res == -1)
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL)
+ TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected errno: %d", errno);
}
TEST(null_address)
@@ -179,11 +177,10 @@ TEST(null_address)
to.tv_sec++;
res = futex_waitv(waitv, NR_FUTEXES, 0, &to, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
- if (res == EINVAL) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(0) TH_LOG("futex_waitv private returned: %d %s",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(res, -1) TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected result: %d", res);
+ if (res == -1)
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL)
+ TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected errno: %d", errno);
/* Testing a NULL address for *waiters */
ASSERT_EQ(clock_gettime(CLOCK_MONOTONIC, &to), 0) TH_LOG("gettime64 failed");
@@ -191,11 +188,10 @@ TEST(null_address)
to.tv_sec++;
res = futex_waitv(NULL, NR_FUTEXES, 0, &to, CLOCK_MONOTONIC);
- if (res == EINVAL) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(0) TH_LOG("futex_waitv private returned: %d %s",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(res, -1) TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected result: %d", res);
+ if (res == -1)
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL)
+ TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected errno: %d", errno);
}
TEST(invalid_clockid)
@@ -212,11 +208,10 @@ TEST(invalid_clockid)
to.tv_sec++;
res = futex_waitv(NULL, NR_FUTEXES, 0, &to, CLOCK_TAI);
- if (res == EINVAL) {
- EXPECT_TRUE(0) TH_LOG("futex_waitv private returned: %d %s",
- res ? errno : res,
- res ? strerror(errno) : "");
- }
+ EXPECT_EQ(res, -1) TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected result: %d", res);
+ if (res == -1)
+ EXPECT_EQ(errno, EINVAL)
+ TH_LOG("futex_waitv returned unexpected errno: %d", errno);
}
TEST_HARNESS_MAIN
--
2.54.0.746.g67dd491aae-goog
prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 1:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-25 7:57 [PATCH 0/2] selftests/futex: Migrate functional tests to harness and fix validations Wake Liu
2026-05-25 7:57 ` [PATCH 1/2] selftests/futex: Migrate functional tests to harness Wake Liu
2026-05-25 18:37 ` André Almeida
2026-05-25 7:57 ` [PATCH 2/2] selftests/futex: Correct validation logic in waitv Wake Liu
2026-05-26 1:06 ` [PATCH v2 0/2] selftests/futex: Migrate functional tests to harness and fix validations Wake Liu
2026-05-26 1:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] selftests/futex: Migrate functional tests to harness Wake Liu
2026-05-26 1:06 ` Wake Liu [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526010635.23980-3-wakel@google.com \
--to=wakel@google.com \
--cc=andrealmeid@igalia.com \
--cc=cmllamas@google.com \
--cc=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kselftest@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shuah@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.