From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: "Bezdeka, Florian" <florian.bezdeka@siemens.com>
Cc: "tglx@kernel.org" <tglx@kernel.org>,
"jmattson@google.com" <jmattson@google.com>,
"rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com" <rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com>,
"binbin.wu@intel.com" <binbin.wu@intel.com>,
"seanjc@google.com" <seanjc@google.com>,
"binbin.wu@linux.intel.com" <binbin.wu@linux.intel.com>,
"bonzini@redhat.com" <bonzini@redhat.com>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"vishal.l.verma@intel.com" <vishal.l.verma@intel.com>,
"kvm@vger.kernel.org" <kvm@vger.kernel.org>,
"Kiszka, Jan" <jan.kiszka@siemens.com>,
"rpm@xenomai.org" <rpm@xenomai.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core
Date: Tue, 26 May 2026 12:21:43 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260526102143.GD4149641@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6ae24df3f3a62957ca997c6788926fd212f074b3.camel@siemens.com>
On Tue, May 26, 2026 at 10:01:41AM +0000, Bezdeka, Florian wrote:
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_KVM_INTEL)
> > +/*
> > + * On VMX, NMIs and IRQs (as configured by KVM) are acknowledged by hardware as
> > + * part of the VM-Exit, i.e. the event itself is consumed as part the VM-Exit.
> > + * x86_entry_from_kvm() is invoked by KVM to effectively forward NMIs and IRQs
> > + * to the kernel for servicing. On SVM, a.k.a. AMD, the NMI/IRQ VM-Exit is
> > + * purely a signal that an NMI/IRQ is pending, i.e. the event that triggered
> > + * the VM-Exit is held pending until it's unblocked in the host.
> > + */
> > +noinstr void x86_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int event_type, unsigned int vector)
> > +{
> > + if (event_type == EVENT_TYPE_EXTINT) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > + /*
> > + * Use FRED dispatch, even when running IDT. The dispatch
> > + * tables are kept in sync between FRED and IDT, and the FRED
> > + * dispatch works well with CFI.
> > + */
> > + fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
>
> Seems this landed in 7.1-rc5.
>
> I'm seeing a build failure here:
>
> arch/x86/entry/common.c: In function ‘x86_entry_from_kvm’:
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:27:17: error: implicit declaration of function ‘fred_entry_from_kvm’; did you mean ‘idt_entry_from_kvm’? [-Wimplicit-function-declaration]
> 27 | fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> | idt_entry_from_kvm
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:50:24: error: ‘return’ with a value, in function returning void [-Wreturn-mismatch]
> 50 | return fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> arch/x86/entry/common.c:18:14: note: declared here
> 18 | noinstr void x86_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int event_type, unsigned int vector)
> | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
>
>
>
> > +#else
> > + idt_entry_from_kvm(vector);
> > +#endif
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + WARN_ON_ONCE(event_type != EVENT_TYPE_NMI);
> > +
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_X86_64
> > + if (cpu_feature_enabled(X86_FEATURE_FRED))
> > + return fred_entry_from_kvm(event_type, vector);
> > +#endif
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Notably, we must use IDT dispatch for NMI when running in IDT mode.
> > + * The FRED NMI context is significantly different and will not work
> > + * right (speficially FRED fixed the NMI recursion issue).
> > + */
> > + idt_entry_from_kvm(vector);
> > +}
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_FOR_KVM(x86_entry_from_kvm);
> > +#endif
> >
>
> [snip]
>
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/entry-common.h
> > @@ -97,4 +97,6 @@ static __always_inline void arch_exit_to
> > }
> > #define arch_exit_to_user_mode arch_exit_to_user_mode
> >
> > +extern void x86_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int entry_type, unsigned int vector);
> > +
> > #endif
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/fred.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/fred.h
> > @@ -110,7 +110,6 @@ static __always_inline unsigned long fre
> > static inline void cpu_init_fred_exceptions(void) { }
> > static inline void cpu_init_fred_rsps(void) { }
> > static inline void fred_complete_exception_setup(void) { }
> > -static inline void fred_entry_from_kvm(unsigned int type, unsigned int vector) { }
>
> That seems still necessary for the !CONFIG_X86_FRED case.
The thing is, KVM_INTEL should force X86_FRED, I'm not sure how you can
have both KVM_INTEL and !X86_FRED, that should be an invalid config.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-26 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 31+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-23 15:56 [PATCH 0/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix VMX interrupt injection vs hrtimer_rearm_deferred() Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core Peter Zijlstra
2026-04-23 17:54 ` Xin Li
2026-04-28 9:43 ` Binbin Wu
2026-04-28 11:25 ` Paolo Bonzini
2026-05-01 20:31 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-01 20:37 ` [PATCH v2 " Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 2:54 ` Yan Zhao
2026-05-08 8:54 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 6:09 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-08 8:53 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 8:56 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-08 9:18 ` [PATCH v3 " Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-08 9:41 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-12 22:31 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-18 8:12 ` Zhao Liu
2026-05-19 18:27 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-20 23:06 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] " Nathan Chancellor
2026-05-26 9:06 ` Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-26 19:35 ` Nathan Chancellor
2026-05-28 9:36 ` [tip: x86/urgent] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix x86_64 CFI build tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-26 10:01 ` [PATCH v3 1/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Move IRQ/NMI dispatch from KVM into x86 core Bezdeka, Florian
2026-05-26 10:21 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2026-05-26 10:42 ` Florian Bezdeka
2026-04-23 15:56 ` [PATCH 2/2] x86/kvm/vmx: Fix VMX vs hrtimer_rearm_deferred() Peter Zijlstra
2026-05-11 12:59 ` David Woodhouse
2026-05-12 22:32 ` Sean Christopherson
2026-05-15 18:15 ` Marc Dionne
2026-05-18 8:01 ` Zhao Liu
2026-05-18 8:16 ` Binbin Wu
2026-05-19 18:27 ` [tip: x86/urgent] " tip-bot2 for Peter Zijlstra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260526102143.GD4149641@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=binbin.wu@intel.com \
--cc=binbin.wu@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=florian.bezdeka@siemens.com \
--cc=jan.kiszka@siemens.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rick.p.edgecombe@intel.com \
--cc=rpm@xenomai.org \
--cc=seanjc@google.com \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=vishal.l.verma@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.