From: <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: jtornosm@redhat.com,anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com,jacob.e.keller@intel.com,kuba@kernel.org,michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com,pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de,rafal.romanowski@intel.com
Cc: <stable@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] ice: fix VF queue configuration with low MTU values" failed to apply to 5.10-stable tree
Date: Thu, 28 May 2026 12:00:06 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <2026052806-proxy-busily-c19b@gregkh> (raw)
The patch below does not apply to the 5.10-stable tree.
If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm
tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit
id to <stable@vger.kernel.org>.
To reproduce the conflict and resubmit, you may use the following commands:
git fetch https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/ linux-5.10.y
git checkout FETCH_HEAD
git cherry-pick -x 3ba4dd024d26372733d1c02e13e076c6016e3320
# <resolve conflicts, build, test, etc.>
git commit -s
git send-email --to '<stable@vger.kernel.org>' --in-reply-to '2026052806-proxy-busily-c19b@gregkh' --subject-prefix 'PATCH 5.10.y' HEAD^..
Possible dependencies:
thanks,
greg k-h
------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------
From 3ba4dd024d26372733d1c02e13e076c6016e3320 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 15 May 2026 11:24:09 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] ice: fix VF queue configuration with low MTU values
The ice driver's VF queue configuration validation rejects
databuffer_size values below 1024 bytes, which prevents VFs from
using MTU values below 871 bytes.
The iavf driver calculates databuffer_size based on the MTU using:
databuffer_size = ALIGN(MTU + LIBETH_RX_LL_LEN, 128)
where LIBETH_RX_LL_LEN = 26 (ETH_HLEN + 2*VLAN_HLEN + ETH_FCS_LEN).
For MTU values below 871:
MTU 870: 870 + 26 = 896, aligned to 128 = 896 (< 1024, rejected)
MTU 871: 871 + 26 = 897, aligned to 128 = 1024 (>= 1024, accepted)
The 1024-byte minimum seems unnecessarily restrictive, because the hardware
supports databuffer_size as low as 128 bytes (the alignment boundary),
which should allow MTU values down to the standard minimum of 68 bytes.
I haven't found the reason why the limit was configured in the commit
9c7dd7566d18 ("ice: add validation in OP_CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES VF message"), so
with no more information and since it is working, change the minimum
databuffer_size validation from 1024 to 128 bytes to allow standard low
MTU values while still preventing invalid configurations.
Fixes: 9c7dd7566d18 ("ice: add validation in OP_CONFIG_VSI_QUEUES VF message")
cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jose Ignacio Tornos Martinez <jtornosm@redhat.com>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Keller <jacob.e.keller@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Michal Swiatkowski <michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de>
Tested-by: Rafal Romanowski <rafal.romanowski@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Tony Nguyen <anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com>
Link: https://patch.msgid.link/20260515182419.1597859-3-anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com
Signed-off-by: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/virt/queues.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/virt/queues.c
index f73d5a3e83d4..31be2f76181c 100644
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/virt/queues.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/ice/virt/queues.c
@@ -840,7 +840,7 @@ int ice_vc_cfg_qs_msg(struct ice_vf *vf, u8 *msg)
if (qpi->rxq.databuffer_size != 0 &&
(qpi->rxq.databuffer_size > ((16 * 1024) - 128) ||
- qpi->rxq.databuffer_size < 1024))
+ qpi->rxq.databuffer_size < 128))
goto error_param;
ring->rx_buf_len = qpi->rxq.databuffer_size;
reply other threads:[~2026-05-28 10:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=2026052806-proxy-busily-c19b@gregkh \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=anthony.l.nguyen@intel.com \
--cc=jacob.e.keller@intel.com \
--cc=jtornosm@redhat.com \
--cc=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=michal.swiatkowski@linux.intel.com \
--cc=pmenzel@molgen.mpg.de \
--cc=rafal.romanowski@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.