From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from galois.linutronix.de (Galois.linutronix.de [193.142.43.55]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 64F2A23395E for ; Fri, 29 May 2026 06:41:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780036881; cv=none; b=P0cmSNoSQ0nsW6ph4Ue5qNne5wwTjSKzU5KsOqFmZjM5Xl6VarHp5lb0XZadkrTY4H7wLPuUmL5VmJ440kmvF4BT66wBi5Mm77p2iGD1stzQGATxPLUl+3uu05GbRmsVEI6zzV5qZw6MPRO827orMbIsIc67zzP5ZsIsYItumu8= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1780036881; c=relaxed/simple; bh=iUBW0RgvXPPHsRJCtntU8Ajk9A2OQ6wyg6t+Lo/iq6o=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=OadAFIZizj8S6XFFKMeNbUR38/X+HZCQ0wnf4NFIToCfoQHZc4Ze9FwkPA5xDRR93/0PKDaaIA8BbI7eL9F3N/PVaeWwBKJfTrijVp+W19NjjxB7sY9S6WxOn/W52JnpjBmDkrng4vt/oA7vBKVVVeP1a7Esq1hv0kQNi0/e41k= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=ZZP0rddD; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b=Cot9dAmY; arc=none smtp.client-ip=193.142.43.55 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=linutronix.de Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="ZZP0rddD"; dkim=permerror (0-bit key) header.d=linutronix.de header.i=@linutronix.de header.b="Cot9dAmY" Date: Fri, 29 May 2026 08:41:16 +0200 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020; t=1780036877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iUBW0RgvXPPHsRJCtntU8Ajk9A2OQ6wyg6t+Lo/iq6o=; b=ZZP0rddD3YvkFjljEZ0KNh3nm36AjcoumN/lBvZjQK9xKAe0XYWF8wQAU4az3zy0JU6E3K RRgZ/pW3EqIZGdEWT85Hd5kthhwpaBQENv3iUwZEnr98jrajHPFx8dzCcyjwAetYDhMyE8 O87369qkvGun/jbf9regVwz8N7loaavmBxAg4i+9uZ9UXVv2r7UBBIaH1DyFrNaxjGWLkK WnZZ8lVAzWm2R5M5Urbg55MJSC7Yo/Cscv15MjlIo3Oap8OVq6m5BOhlA5D1pspRQmsLD1 1gYrLJFaX8a9DKEbNw4Z4NwNV7vQwirSiDYqnawfEcih0dLLtAI4ZGLNEPbShg== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=ed25519-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linutronix.de; s=2020e; t=1780036877; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=iUBW0RgvXPPHsRJCtntU8Ajk9A2OQ6wyg6t+Lo/iq6o=; b=Cot9dAmYQ5EVxnXk2tA3NrH1SI9ZhgiFYnphVehWIoN1DurOUU0JqfosDANSNgUnFGr5oY G6cCyWR/639QxrDA== From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Chuyi Zhou Cc: paulmck@kernel.org, tglx@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, muchun.song@linux.dev, bp@alien8.de, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, pbonzini@redhat.com, clrkwllms@kernel.org, rostedt@goodmis.org, nadav.amit@gmail.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 00/12] Allow preemption during IPI completion waiting to improve real-time performance Message-ID: <20260529064116.TGabD8Tn@linutronix.de> References: <20260528151338.617843-1-zhouchuyi@bytedance.com> <25c6dbe4-1f59-4ac0-a9ed-eac0c0be9e97@bytedance.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <25c6dbe4-1f59-4ac0-a9ed-eac0c0be9e97@bytedance.com> On 2026-05-29 11:22:48 [+0800], Chuyi Zhou wrote: > I will carry your Tested-by tag if I need to post another revision. I didn't look at v6 yet but the bot responded to the v5 that I added to my tree. I guess you addressed those in v6? I will try to stuff it my tree later today=E2=80=A6 Sebastian