From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Hans Zhang" <18255117159@163.com>
Cc: linux-pci@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset
Date: Sat, 30 May 2026 16:08:11 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260530160812.48CBC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260530153101.695580-11-18255117159@163.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
New issues:
- [High] The patch replaces `dw_pcie_find_capability()` with a cached `pci->pcie_cap`, but hardware clocks are not enabled during `dw_pcie_ep_init()` on `qcom-ep`, causing an unclocked MMIO access or caching an invalid 0 offset that later corrupts standard PCI configuration space.
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Concurrent execution of global and PERST threaded IRQs causes fatal unclocked MMIO accesses and data races.
--
commit 4d4786c3c255dd8f971ef41e85f15f1fa9ead9d4
Author: Hans Zhang <18255117159@163.com>
PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: Use cached PCIe capability offset
dw_pcie_ep_init() calls ep->ops->pre_init() (enables hardware) and then
dw_pcie_get_pcie_cap() to cache the offset. Therefore, the IRQ handlers
run after the cache is populated, so they can safely use pci->pcie_cap
directly.
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> index 56184e6ca6e69..0471f96d3c781 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/dwc/pcie-qcom-ep.c
> @@ -307,15 +307,13 @@ static void qcom_pcie_ep_icc_update(struct qcom_pcie_ep *pcie_ep)
> {
> struct dw_pcie *pci = &pcie_ep->pci;
> - u32 offset, status;
> - int speed, width;
> - int ret;
> + int speed, width, ret;
> + u32 status;
>
> if (!pcie_ep->icc_mem)
> return;
>
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> - status = readw(pci->dbi_base + offset + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
> + status = readw(pci->dbi_base + pci->pcie_cap + PCI_EXP_LNKSTA);
[Severity: High]
Does this caching work safely on qcom-ep? The commit message states that
dw_pcie_ep_init() calls pre_init() to enable hardware clocks. However, for
qcom-ep, clocks are only enabled later via qcom_pcie_enable_resources() in
the PERST deassert IRQ path.
This means clocks are disabled during dw_pcie_ep_init(), which will either
cause a synchronous external abort when reading the capability, or result in
pci->pcie_cap being populated with a cached offset of 0.
If pci->pcie_cap is 0, won't this readw() fetch from pci->dbi_base + 0x12,
which is part of BAR0, instead of the link status register? This could fetch
incorrect values and break interconnect bandwidth scaling.
[ ... ]
> @@ -492,13 +490,12 @@ static int qcom_pcie_perst_deassert(struct dw_pcie *pci)
> dw_pcie_dbi_ro_wr_en(pci);
>
> /* Set the L0s Exit Latency to 2us-4us = 0x6 */
> - offset = dw_pcie_find_capability(pci, PCI_CAP_ID_EXP);
> + offset = pci->pcie_cap;
> val = dw_pcie_readl_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP);
> FIELD_MODIFY(PCI_EXP_LNKCAP_L0SEL, &val, 0x6);
> dw_pcie_writel_dbi(pci, offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP, val);
[Severity: High]
Similarly, if pci->pcie_cap is cached as 0 because clocks were disabled
during initialization, won't this overwrite the base PCI configuration header?
Using an offset of 0 means offset + PCI_EXP_LNKCAP evaluates to 0x0c, which
would erroneously modify the cache line size, latency timer, header type,
and BIST registers instead of the link capabilities register.
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but is there a race condition between the
PERST IRQ thread and the global IRQ thread that can cause a panic?
The qcom_pcie_ep_perst_irq_thread() and qcom_pcie_ep_global_irq_thread()
execute concurrently without mutual exclusion. If the host asserts PERST
while the global IRQ thread is processing an event, the PERST thread will
disable clocks:
qcom_pcie_ep_perst_irq_thread()
qcom_pcie_perst_assert()
qcom_pcie_disable_resources()
If the global IRQ thread is simultaneously performing MMIO access:
qcom_pcie_ep_global_irq_thread()
status = readl_relaxed(pcie_ep->parf + PARF_INT_ALL_STATUS);
Could this MMIO access while clocks are asynchronously disabled cause an
immediate synchronous external abort?
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260530153101.695580-1-18255117159@163.com?part=10
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-05-30 16:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-30 15:30 [PATCH v2 00/16] PCI: dwc: Cache PCIe capability offset and simplify drivers Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 01/16] PCI: dwc: Add pcie_cap field and helper in designware header Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 02/16] PCI: dwc: Use cached PCIe capability offset in core Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:11 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 03/16] PCI: dwc: imx6: Use cached PCIe capability offset Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 04/16] PCI: dwc: layerscape-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 05/16] PCI: dwc: meson: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 06/16] PCI: dwc: rockchip: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:01 ` sashiko-bot
2026-06-01 17:11 ` Sebastian Reichel
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 07/16] PCI: dwc: eswin: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 08/16] PCI: dwc: fu740: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 09/16] PCI: dwc: intel-gw: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:04 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 10/16] PCI: dwc: qcom-ep: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:08 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 11/16] PCI: dwc: qcom: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 12/16] PCI: dwc: sophgo: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:25 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 13/16] PCI: dwc: spacemit-k1: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 15:30 ` [PATCH v2 14/16] PCI: dwc: spear13xx: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 15/16] PCI: dwc: tegra194: " Hans Zhang
2026-05-30 16:06 ` sashiko-bot
2026-05-30 15:31 ` [PATCH v2 16/16] PCI: dwc: ultrarisc: " Hans Zhang
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260530160812.48CBC1F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=18255117159@163.com \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.