All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: Caio Morais <caiomorais@usp.br>
Cc: davem@davemloft.net, edumazet@google.com, pabeni@redhat.com,
	horms@kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpls: refactor mpls_dev_notify() to use guard(mutex)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 12:03:35 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602120335.715c19b7@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260601143827.3087733-1-caiomorais@usp.br>

On Mon,  1 Jun 2026 11:38:23 -0300 Caio Morais wrote:
> Replace explicit mutex_lock() and mutex_unlock() calls with the
> guard(mutex) auto-cleanup helper from <linux/cleanup.h>. 

Quoting documentation:

  Using device-managed and cleanup.h constructs
  ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
  
  Netdev remains skeptical about promises of all "auto-cleanup" APIs,
  including even ``devm_`` helpers, historically. They are not the preferred
  style of implementation, merely an acceptable one.
  
  Use of ``guard()`` is discouraged within any function longer than 20 lines,
  ``scoped_guard()`` is considered more readable. Using normal lock/unlock is
  still (weakly) preferred.
  
  Low level cleanup constructs (such as ``__free()``) can be used when building
  APIs and helpers, especially scoped iterators. However, direct use of
  ``__free()`` within networking core and drivers is discouraged.
  Similar guidance applies to declaring variables mid-function.
  
See: https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/next/process/maintainer-netdev.html#using-device-managed-and-cleanup-h-constructs


In general please don't send us arbitrary code cleanup patches
if you're not actively working on real changes to the code.
-- 
pw-bot: reject

      reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-06-01 14:38 [PATCH] mpls: refactor mpls_dev_notify() to use guard(mutex) Caio Morais
2026-06-02 19:03 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260602120335.715c19b7@kernel.org \
    --to=kuba@kernel.org \
    --cc=caiomorais@usp.br \
    --cc=davem@davemloft.net \
    --cc=edumazet@google.com \
    --cc=horms@kernel.org \
    --cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.