From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@kernel.org>
To: "D. Wythe" <alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>,
Dust Li <dust.li@linux.alibaba.com>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>,
Paolo Abeni <pabeni@redhat.com>,
Sidraya Jayagond <sidraya@linux.ibm.com>,
Wenjia Zhang <wenjia@linux.ibm.com>,
Mahanta Jambigi <mjambigi@linux.ibm.com>,
Simon Horman <horms@kernel.org>,
Tony Lu <tonylu@linux.alibaba.com>,
Wen Gu <guwen@linux.alibaba.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org,
linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org,
oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com, pasic@linux.ibm.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/smc: transition to RDMA core CQ pooling
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 14:03:59 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602140359.3b97d180@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260528084819.6059-1-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com>
On Thu, 28 May 2026 16:48:17 +0800 D. Wythe wrote:
> This series transitions SMC-R completion handling to RDMA core CQ pooling
> via the ib_cqe API. The new completion model improves scalability by
> allowing per-link completion processing across multiple cores and enables
> DIM-based interrupt moderation.
>
> As a side effect, the increased concurrency can amplify contention for TX
> slots on the shared wait queue. Patch 2 addresses this by switching TX slot
> allocation from non-exclusive wait_event() to prepare_to_wait_exclusive(),
> which avoids thundering-herd wakeups under contention.
>
> Patch 1 replaces the global per-device CQ and manual tasklet polling model
> with RDMA core CQ pooling.
> Patch 2 reduces TX slot contention by using exclusive wait queue entries
> during allocation.
Sashiko reports a couple of issues on patch 1:
https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260528084819.6059-2-alibuda@linux.alibaba.com
Are these legit?
Either way - would be good to get some reviews here from (ohter) SMC
maintainers.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-02 21:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-05-28 8:48 [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/smc: transition to RDMA core CQ pooling D. Wythe
2026-05-28 8:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 1/2] " D. Wythe
2026-06-04 8:36 ` Paolo Abeni
2026-06-05 4:00 ` D. Wythe
2026-05-28 8:48 ` [PATCH net-next v2 2/2] net/smc: reduce TX slot contention with exclusive wait D. Wythe
2026-06-08 14:04 ` Dust Li
2026-06-02 21:03 ` Jakub Kicinski [this message]
2026-06-05 3:29 ` [PATCH net-next 0/2] net/smc: transition to RDMA core CQ pooling D. Wythe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-05-08 6:37 D. Wythe
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260602140359.3b97d180@kernel.org \
--to=kuba@kernel.org \
--cc=alibuda@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=dust.li@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=edumazet@google.com \
--cc=guwen@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=horms@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-rdma@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-s390@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjambigi@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=netdev@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=oliver.yang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=pabeni@redhat.com \
--cc=pasic@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=sidraya@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=tonylu@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=wenjia@linux.ibm.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.