All of lore.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
To: Jan Kara <jack@suse.cz>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
	Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>,
	linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	lvc-project@linuxtesting.org, stable@vger.kernel.org,
	Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] make new mount API honour SB_NOUSER (was Re: [PATCH] block: Avoid mounting the bdev pseudo-filesystem in userspace)
Date: Tue, 2 Jun 2026 15:07:51 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260602140751.GS2636677@ZenIV> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <eevyuiiqt5b4n7kws2lc24jk2njdllanojl76t5cftx6he6hba@y46tiknbebj4>

On Tue, Jun 02, 2026 at 11:11:11AM +0200, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 02-06-26 03:04:44, Al Viro wrote:
> > one should *not* be allowed to mount one of those, new API or not.
> > 
> > Reported-by: Denis Arefev <arefev@swemel.ru>
> > Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
> 
> Won't it make sense to actually check fc->sb_flags before we call
> vfs_create_mount()? Otherwise it looks good to me.

Interpretation of fc->sb_flags is up to your ->get_tree().  What matters
is ->s_flags in the resulting superblock; that's type-independent and
that's what we ought to check...

  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-06-02 14:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-05-21  7:28 [PATCH] block: Avoid mounting the bdev pseudo-filesystem in userspace Denis Arefev
2026-05-25  6:07 ` Christoph Hellwig
2026-06-02  1:21   ` Al Viro
2026-05-26 16:37 ` Jens Axboe
2026-06-02  1:19 ` Al Viro
2026-06-02  1:35   ` Al Viro
2026-06-02  2:04     ` [PATCH] make new mount API honour SB_NOUSER (was Re: [PATCH] block: Avoid mounting the bdev pseudo-filesystem in userspace) Al Viro
2026-06-02  9:11       ` Jan Kara
2026-06-02 13:23         ` Arefev
2026-06-02 14:54           ` Al Viro
2026-06-02 14:07         ` Al Viro [this message]
2026-06-02 14:55       ` Christian Brauner

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260602140751.GS2636677@ZenIV \
    --to=viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk \
    --cc=arefev@swemel.ru \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=jack@suse.cz \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=lvc-project@linuxtesting.org \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.