From: sashiko-bot@kernel.org
To: "Rosen Penev" <rosenp@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-input@vger.kernel.org, dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Input: apbps2: Simplify resource mapping and IRQ retrieval
Date: Wed, 03 Jun 2026 19:33:33 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260603193333.884B11F00893@smtp.kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260603192415.6679-1-rosenp@gmail.com>
Thank you for your contribution! Sashiko AI review found 2 potential issue(s) to consider:
Pre-existing issues:
- [High] Requesting a shared IRQ before the serio port is fully allocated and initialized leads to a potential NULL pointer dereference or uninitialized spinlock access in the interrupt handler.
- [High] Mixing `devm` managed interrupts with manual resource unregistration causes an incorrect teardown order, leading to a use-after-free if a shared interrupt fires during device removal.
--
commit d306647eec008111ed14c378d300aa2cb98191b6
Author: Rosen Penev <rosenp@gmail.com>
Input: apbps2: Simplify resource mapping and IRQ retrieval
Simplify resource mapping by using devm_platform_ioremap_resource()
instead of the longer devm_platform_get_and_ioremap_resource() helper
as the last argument is NULL.
Additionally, use platform_get_irq() to retrieve the interrupt
instead of irq_of_parse_and_map() and propagate its error code on
failure. irq_of_parse_and_map() requires irq_dispose_mapping, which is
missing.
> diff --git a/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c b/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c
> index 0aa4ab00af352..5f21acdd41139 100644
> --- a/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c
> +++ b/drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c
[ ... ]
> @@ -148,7 +148,10 @@ static int apbps2_of_probe(struct platform_device *ofdev)
> iowrite32be(0, &priv->regs->ctrl);
>
> /* IRQ */
> - irq = irq_of_parse_and_map(ofdev->dev.of_node, 0);
> + irq = platform_get_irq(ofdev, 0);
> + if (irq < 0)
> + return irq;
> +
> err = devm_request_irq(&ofdev->dev, irq, apbps2_isr,
> IRQF_SHARED, "apbps2", priv);
[Severity: High]
This is a pre-existing issue, but requesting a shared IRQ here before the
serio port is fully allocated and initialized creates a window for a NULL
pointer dereference.
If a shared interrupt fires immediately (triggered by another device on the
same line) and there is leftover data in the PS/2 FIFO, apbps2_isr() will
execute:
drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c:apbps2_isr() {
...
serio_interrupt(priv->io, data, rxflags);
...
}
Since priv->io is either NULL or not fully initialized until later in probe:
drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c:apbps2_of_probe() {
...
priv->io = ... /* allocated later */
...
}
Could this lead to a crash if the ISR fires early?
[Severity: High]
This is another pre-existing issue, but does mixing a devm-managed interrupt
here with manual unregistration in apbps2_of_remove() cause a teardown order
issue?
In apbps2_of_remove(), the driver manually unregisters and frees the serio
port:
drivers/input/serio/apbps2.c:apbps2_of_remove() {
...
serio_unregister_port(priv->io);
...
}
Because the interrupt was requested with devm_request_irq(), its handler
remains active until devres runs free_irq() after apbps2_of_remove() returns.
If a shared interrupt fires during this window and there is pending data,
apbps2_isr() will execute and pass the already-freed priv->io pointer to
serio_interrupt(), resulting in a use-after-free.
Could the interrupt teardown order be adjusted to prevent this race?
> if (err) {
--
Sashiko AI review · https://sashiko.dev/#/patchset/20260603192415.6679-1-rosenp@gmail.com?part=1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-03 19:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-03 19:24 [PATCH] Input: apbps2: Simplify resource mapping and IRQ retrieval Rosen Penev
2026-06-03 19:33 ` sashiko-bot [this message]
2026-06-06 21:01 ` Dmitry Torokhov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260603193333.884B11F00893@smtp.kernel.org \
--to=sashiko-bot@kernel.org \
--cc=dmitry.torokhov@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-input@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rosenp@gmail.com \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is an external index of several public inboxes,
see mirroring instructions on how to clone and mirror
all data and code used by this external index.